Electronic Health Records

Adoption & Implementation News

ACP Offers EHR Clinical Documentation Improvement Guidelines

By Stephanie Reardon

Long trails of information can lead to difficulties in finding and understanding the most important information within a patient’s records at the point of care.

- The American College of Physicians (ACP) has released a report detailing recommendations for EHR clinical documentation improvement and best utilize technology to improve patient care and provider sharing.

A byproduct of increased physician EHR use is that it has simplified the process of practicing defensive medicine by allowing  providers to maintain more detailed documentation and avoid cases of alleged malpractice brought against them by patients. However, these long trails of information can also lead to difficulties in finding and understanding the most important information within a patient’s records at the point of care.

In response to this overcrowding of information, the ACP has recommended several policy changes to support proper clinical documentation.

“The primary purpose of clinical documentation should be to support patient care and improve clinical outcomes through enhanced communication,” the first rule of the report states. The need for this rule appears unnecessary, but sifting through extra details caused by practicing defensive medicine often leads to confusion for the next provider reading the document. Previous notes can be unnecessarily included in updated notes, straining a physician’s ability to locate the most important information.

In early 2014, the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) voiced its disapproval of copying and pasting information in EHRs. According to the group, this practice of cloning with an EHR creates the risk of significant errors or the perpetuation of outdated information.

  • CPSI Acquires Healthland, Expands EHR Technology
  • MedPAC Calls for Alternative Option to Take Place of MIPS
  • Providers look to Canada for lessons in ICD-10 implementation
  • AHRQ Awards $13.4M for Pediatric Clinical Quality Measures
  • What clinics should consider when selecting an EHR system?
  • Quincy Medical Group joins IHS ACO
  • CHIME Urges FDA to Advance Medical Device Interoperability
  • The clock is ticking on EHR incentives
  • DoD loses control of health IT budget after fumbling iEHR
  • Lippincott Williams & Wilkins offers nurses EHR tool
  • ONC Celebrates FHIR-Powered Interoperability Demonstrations
  • WEDI survey: Delay caused ICD-10 testing to slip into 2015
  • EHR Adoption, EHR Use More Effective in Team-Based Settings
  • Epic Trails in Black Book Ranking of Inpatient EHR Vendors
  • 90% of Providers Believe EHR Interoperability Improves Care
  • How do best practices become EHR clinical decision support?
  • MACRA Incentives Likely to Increase Physician Health IT Use
  • UDIs Sought for Meaningful Use, EHR Certification Rules
  • 93 Percent of Hospitals Allow Online Patient Access to EHRs
  • What’s the difference between ACOs and capitation?
  • ICD-10 Symposium takes center stage at HIMSS 2013
  • Greenway Top EHR Vendor for Primary Care EHR Satisfaction
  • How EHR Use Benefits, Challenges Primary Care Coordination
  • Solo Practitioners Exempt from EHR Implementation in Minnesota
  • CVS Among Newest Additions to Surescripts Medication Service
  • Epic Systems Patient Portal Offers Mayo’s Educational Resources
  • eClinicalWorks Settlement Leads to Distrust of EHR Vendors
  • CORHIO adds more providers to its HIE
  • Verizon telehealth connects specialists to developing nations
  • Warehouse Fire Highlights Importance of Electronic Health Records
  • Staff Training Crucial in ICD-10 Conversion Preparations
  • Nurses need to interact with patients while using laptops, EHRs
  • What does an ICD-10 delay mean for providers, payers, vendors?
  • ONC-REACHNet Collaborate to Use FHIR for Patient EHR Consent
  • Maine’s HIE adds analytics, increases use by 150% in 2013
  • Rural Guadalupe County Hospital achieves HIMSS Stage 6
  • AMIA Seeks Improvements to PCORI Data Access, Exchange Policy
  • AHA Responds to EHR Certification Criteria, Stage 2 MU Changes
  • ONC releases health IT patient safety plan to reduce medical errors
  • EHR vendors Epic Systems, Cerner to add new employees
  • CMS Addresses the Isolated Issues in ICD-10 Implementation
  • Health Information Exchange Advances in Texas, Georgia
  • Health information exchange grew by leaps and bounds in 2013
  • AHIMA 2012: EHR and the physician experience
  • Two Adventist Hospitals Recognized for Exemplary EHR Use
  • Value-based Care to Test Small, Rural Provider HIT in 2017
  • Meaningful use workflow tips for eligible providers
  • EHR Data Interoperability Needs Strong Security Platforms
  • Legislation points to role of nurses in quality care, safety
  • EHR contract guide will help docs keep data after replacement
  • How to Properly Implement Patient Portals for Meaningful Use
  • HIPAA violations need proactive solutions
  • Patients turn to mHealth over prescriptions, says survey
  • Study: Telemedicine slashes ED errors for rural kids
  • WEDI to examine payment models, HIT innovation in 2013 report
  • Meaningful Use Workgroup tackles EHR clinical documentation
  • Meritus Epic EHR Selection Came Down to Satisfaction
  • What problems lists mean to interoperability, meaningful use
  • Rice Hospital, ACMC Health to Merge for Epic Implementation
  • EHR vendors to be subject to new fee under 2014 ONC budget
  • EHR best practices: Adopting a health IT culture (Pt I)
  • EHR vendor consolidation: What does the future look like?
  • UCLA awarded grant to study telemedicine, behavioral health
  • Does Healthcare Fraud Impact Meaningful Use Audits?
  • Why should business intelligence accompany EHR adoption?
  • Study highlights rise in US healthcare costs since 1980
  • How does the patient’s story feature in accountable care?
  • Outdated IT delays ACOs, pay-for-performance models for payors
  • VA takes first step towards upgrading VistA EHR system
  • AMA continues ICD-10 opposition despite looming deadline
  • LOINC Director Advises Restraint in Health Data Standardization
  • Black Book: 81% of practices committed to EHR replacement
  • Are Lab Test Displays Subpar Among EHR Technology?
  • EHR Interoperability, Integration Focus of HIT Replacement
  • ICD-10 transition and your practice
  • Groups Wary of Plan for Electronic Clinical Quality Measures
  • DoD Completes Third MHS Genesis EHR Implementation
  • 275 Adventist Health Jobs Transition to Cerner for Partnership
  • AHA, HIMSS Discuss CMS Quality Payment Program Proposed Rule
  • Patient engagement a priority for AHIMA at annual convention
  • AAFP Group Outlines Ten-Year Plan for Health IT Improvements
  • Health Information Exchange Should Extend Past Meaningful Use
  • Ophthalmology database to boost eye disease data analytics
  • ONC: Two thirds of physicians adopt advanced EHR capabilities
  • Hospital Roundup: Recent Health Technology Investments
  • CIO series: Meaningful use lessons, strategies from CIOs
  • CMS, FDA Push for Increased Use of Unique Device Identifiers
  • Study: Showing lab costs in the EHR can save money
  • DirectTrust Experiences Continued Growth in Health Data Exchange
  • EHR attestation is based on a general patient pool
  • Can small providers knock out ICD-10 “in a few weekends?”
  • EHR Use May Not be Adequate for Precision Medicine Research
  • Evaluating EHR trouble spots can help boost performance
  • EHR Incentive Programs top $19.2 billion in payments
  • NIH Director: mHealth needs to show results
  • mHealth groups: Put patient generated data in Stage 3 MU
  • EHR Companies Deny Data Blocking, Defend Interoperability Fees
  • More than half of ACOs nationwide contract with Medicare
  • Incorporating Record Locator Services into Clinician EHR Use
  • Lawsuit Questions Electronic Health Record Sharing Costs
  • Another key ACP recommendation is the need for physicians to define professional standards for their specific organizations and to facilitate a standard through collaboration with other providers. The report further details what physicians should make available when putting their EHR documentation standards in place:

    • A detailed version of the patient’s story
    • Previously documented clinical information

    In order to keep EHR reporting up to date with modern use and technology, the ACP has also recommended changes to the EHR system design:

    • EHR developers should update EHR systems to allow for long-term care as well as care that incorporates teams of providers
    • Documentation in EHR systems should support a physician’s thought processes while they are documenting
    • EHRs should support the ability to link original information sources
    • Developers should limit the number of checkboxes a user has to click, especially in cases where previous documentation already indicates the information
    • Systems should allow for the inclusions of patient-generated data

    “Physicians must learn to leverage the enormous and growing capabilities of EHR technology without diminishing or devaluing the importance of narrative entries. Failure to do so will inevitably influence the way we think and teach, to the detriment of patient care.,” the report concludes. “Cooperation is needed among industry health care providers, health care systems, government, and insurers to continue to improve the documentation. We must work together to fundamentally change the EHR from a passive recipient of information to an active virtual care team member.”



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...