Electronic Health Records

Adoption & Implementation News

ACP Offers EHR Clinical Documentation Improvement Guidelines

By Stephanie Reardon

Long trails of information can lead to difficulties in finding and understanding the most important information within a patient’s records at the point of care.

- The American College of Physicians (ACP) has released a report detailing recommendations for EHR clinical documentation improvement and best utilize technology to improve patient care and provider sharing.

A byproduct of increased physician EHR use is that it has simplified the process of practicing defensive medicine by allowing  providers to maintain more detailed documentation and avoid cases of alleged malpractice brought against them by patients. However, these long trails of information can also lead to difficulties in finding and understanding the most important information within a patient’s records at the point of care.

In response to this overcrowding of information, the ACP has recommended several policy changes to support proper clinical documentation.

“The primary purpose of clinical documentation should be to support patient care and improve clinical outcomes through enhanced communication,” the first rule of the report states. The need for this rule appears unnecessary, but sifting through extra details caused by practicing defensive medicine often leads to confusion for the next provider reading the document. Previous notes can be unnecessarily included in updated notes, straining a physician’s ability to locate the most important information.

In early 2014, the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) voiced its disapproval of copying and pasting information in EHRs. According to the group, this practice of cloning with an EHR creates the risk of significant errors or the perpetuation of outdated information.

  • ECRI Institute helps hospitals reach 2014 Alarm Safety Goal
  • Studies show EHR, CPOE provide positive ROI long term
  • Congress Calls for Stage 3 Meaningful Use Rule to Be Paused
  • Lack of CEHRT to force changes in 2015 Medicare program
  • Lack of EHR Interoperability Holding Back Enterprise Imaging
  • Is Stage 2 Meaningful Use a step in the right direction?
  • Is Experian now the frontrunner in revenue cycle management?
  • HIMSS, CHIME to Help International Health IT Professionals
  • HIMSS: ICD-10 must go forward as planned for 2014
  • Henry Ford Health System Recovers From EHR Downtime Episode
  • Pa. Health Information Exchange Authority Gains 3 New HIOs
  • Providers Still Lack ICD-10 Testing Plans, Impact Assessments
  • How document types affect meaningful use, readmissions
  • LOINC Director Advises Restraint in Health Data Standardization
  • TN may require initial in-person visit for telemedicine
  • EHR open notes: Should parents have access to teens’ PHI?
  • Telehealth adoption to benefit from ACOs, payment reform?
  • ONC guide to protecting patient health data
  • Lack of VA, DOD EHR progress leads Congress to yank the chain
  • Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center announces data breach
  • ONC Details Plan for Health IT Safety Center, Patient Safety
  • Obama backs Shinseki as VA wait list problems grow
  • EHR Incentive Program statistics for August 2012
  • ONC Promises 2015 Health IT Certification Companion Guides
  • FL District Court Dismisses Epic Systems False Claims Act Case
  • CMS Offers 3 Listening Sessions on MACRA Proposed Rules
  • What role can health information exchanges play in big data?
  • How Innovative EHR Use Supports Care Quality Improvements
  • Senators to FDA: Where is mHealth, medical device certainty?
  • Will Revenue Cycle Outsourcing Save Healthcare from ICD-10?
  • Best practices for hiring, managing health IT consultants
  • Vermont Health Information Exchange Adds Telehealth Component
  • Complex Clinical Decision Support May Improve Cancer Care
  • Understanding ICD-10: Crosswalks and General Equivalence Mappings
  • ONC Health IT Certification Rule to Hold Vendors Accountable
  • Pundits offer predictions for healthcare, health IT in 2014
  • Meaningful Use Reporting Bill Draws Support of Industry
  • New reimbursement contract for BCBSM, Munson Healthcare
  • 40% of Physicians See More EHR Challenges than Benefits
  • Health Data Interoperability Needs Information Blocking to End
  • Midnight deadline looms for Medicare meaningful use EPs
  • EHR, accessibility, and meaningful dialogue in the clinic
  • ONC issues final Health IT Safety Plan, awards sole contract
  • DoD Awards $139M Contract for Patient Engagement, Access
  • ATA Opens Telehealth Accreditation Program to Providers
  • EHRs and the worsening diabetes epidemic
  • NWU Project for Patient-Reported Outcomes, EHR Integration
  • CHIME Urges FDA to Advance Medical Device Interoperability
  • Surescripts Brings Medication History Data to LTPAC Providers
  • How EHR Implementation Challenges Pay Off in the Long Run
  • GAO Calls on HHS to Better Encourage Patient EHR Access
  • Medicare vs. Medicaid EHR incentives: What’s best for your practice?
  • Halamka: Stage 2 Meaningful Use, ICD-10 timelines unrealistic
  • Meaningful use audits: Q&A with Ober|Kaler’s Joshua Freemire
  • VA EHR Interoperability Still Lagging, Senate Hearing Finds
  • POTUS 60-Day Regulation Freeze Impacts Health IT Rules
  • ONC Embraces Industry-led Testing of Health IT Tools
  • More on the federally funded MA HIE
  • 3M to Hold and Build Health Information Systems Business
  • Using APIs in Healthcare to Make Patient Data Actionable
  • Will the AMA halt ICD-10 with new letter, Twitter campaign?
  • Texas HIE Merger Brings Millions of Records Under One Roof
  • Critical Access Hospitals Lag in Meaningful Use Attestation
  • VA pilot brings together mHealth and EHRs for better care
  • New PQRS FAQs, Updates to Meaningful Use Attestation System
  • Delaware REC helps 1000 providers reach Stage 1 Meaningful Use
  • EHR adoption, use among ambulatory care providers
  • Survey: 75% of providers haven’t started ICD-10 testing
  • A Physician’s Advice for Selecting the Right EHR Replacement
  • Q&A with American Telemedicine Association: Part II
  • The EHR cost-control debate continues
  • CMS Builds Meaningful Use Public Health Reporting Repository
  • VA Cerner Implementation Contract Balloons to $16 Billion
  • Recognizing Healthcare Interoperability as a Moving Target
  • ICD-10 Compliance a Struggle for Some Physician Practices
  • NY Health Information Exchange Awarded $2M in CDC Initiative
  • CMS quality improvement program raises concerns for AHA, FAH
  • How a Full-Scale ICD-10 Test Helped Flag Transition Issues
  • Home health ploy to defraud Medicare leads to guilty plea
  • The Week Ahead in Health IT Interoperability: Dec. 28-Jan. 3
  • Black Book: Providers Want Seamless EHR, Practice Management
  • Making Health IT Interoperability More Concrete, Actionable
  • VA Cerner Implementation Contract Likely to Top Out at $10B
  • DE Health Information Exchange Improves EHR Patient Access
  • CHIME Suspends 2-Year National Patient ID Challenge Initiative
  • EHR adoption, patient privacy causing buzz on Capitol Hill
  • Allscripts Launches EHR-Integrated Lyft Transportation Service
  • Full ONC SAFER Guide Implementation Low, EHR Safety Can Improve
  • What does ONC mean by a certified EHR?
  • “Era of unhappy doctors” brought on by burnout, revenue woes
  • Engagement critical to Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • AHA Highlights Need for Improved Data Provision to MSSP ACOs
  • Senators Request Timeline for VA Cerner EHR Implementation
  • EverGreen Health partners with Microsoft HealthVault
  • One Barrier Stands in Way of Secure Electronic Messaging
  • Physician series: EHRs a “challenge” for large cancer practice
  • Survey Shows Differing Views on EHR, Clinical IT Priorities
  • Allscripts Drops Case Against NYC Health and Hospitals Corp.
  • A Shakeup at Allscripts
  • Should psychiatric notes be part of an EHR?
  • Another key ACP recommendation is the need for physicians to define professional standards for their specific organizations and to facilitate a standard through collaboration with other providers. The report further details what physicians should make available when putting their EHR documentation standards in place:

    • A detailed version of the patient’s story
    • Previously documented clinical information

    In order to keep EHR reporting up to date with modern use and technology, the ACP has also recommended changes to the EHR system design:

    • EHR developers should update EHR systems to allow for long-term care as well as care that incorporates teams of providers
    • Documentation in EHR systems should support a physician’s thought processes while they are documenting
    • EHRs should support the ability to link original information sources
    • Developers should limit the number of checkboxes a user has to click, especially in cases where previous documentation already indicates the information
    • Systems should allow for the inclusions of patient-generated data

    “Physicians must learn to leverage the enormous and growing capabilities of EHR technology without diminishing or devaluing the importance of narrative entries. Failure to do so will inevitably influence the way we think and teach, to the detriment of patient care.,” the report concludes. “Cooperation is needed among industry health care providers, health care systems, government, and insurers to continue to improve the documentation. We must work together to fundamentally change the EHR from a passive recipient of information to an active virtual care team member.”



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...