Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

Avoiding Financial Implications of Quality Payment Program

In order to avoid negative financial implications in the Quality Payment Program, healthcare professionals must utilize strong health IT and EHR use.

By Sara Heath

- In these early days of the first performance year for the Quality Payment Program, healthcare professionals will need to develop a plan that leverages strong health IT use and health information exchange in order to avoid negative payment adjustments.


In a recent op-ed, Jon Law, Executive Director of the Paso el Norte Health Information Exchange in Texas, explains how failing to utilize EHRs and other technologies can have negative financial ramifications for the El Paso area.

If Medicare physicians meet all quality measures included in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) during this first performance period, those in the area could receive a total maximum payout of $19 million in 2019, Law wrote in the El Paso Times.

However, if they fail to perform well, physicians in the area could lose out on that $19 million. When all is said and done, the area could lose or gain $129 million over the course of four years.

  • ICD-10 Coalition opposes ICD-10 delay in SGR patch
  • CVS announces Epic EHR partnership with four providers
  • California, Pennsylvania HIEs Make Health Data Exchange News
  • KLAS foresees EHR replacement among ambulatory providers
  • Quality reporting as a means of EHR collaboration, healthcare reform
  • Data migration can leave your information vulnerable
  • Top 50 Most Popular Hospital Inpatient EHR Systems in US
  • EHR adoption has little effect on Medicaid costs, says study
  • WEDI to help develop ICD-10 delay action plan at summit
  • AMA Appoints Dr. David Barbe as its New President-Elect
  • Three Wisconsin hospitals earn Stage 7 EMRAM Award
  • Technical requirements for practices in meaningful use
  • UK Epic EHR Implementation Leads to Technical Problems
  • Are HIE, Patient Access Meaningful Use Requirements Unfair?
  • Health IT Interoperability Continues Growth under DirectTrust
  • Why the Healthcare Cloud Holds the Key to Future Innovation
  • Micky Tripathi Joins The Sequoia Project Board of Directors
  • What is driving the drop in meaningful use participation?
  • 4 EHR Best Practices for Improving Clinical Workflows
  • Can EHR Connectivity Reduce Medical Errors?
  • VA EHR Interoperability Still Lagging, Senate Hearing Finds
  • EHR Integration Improves Assessment for COPD Patients
  • ONC officially turns NwHIN into eHealth Exchange
  • CMS Reminds Providers of Upcoming ICD-10 Testing Week
  • HIPAA or patient ownership to safeguard health data?
  • AHIMA: Quality documentation is key for useful, accurate EHR
  • ONC Proposed Rule Calls for New Certified EHR Technology Process
  • State of Kansas to officially take over Kansas HIE in July
  • Ohio Healthcare IT Day 2014 to focus on telehealth
  • CPEHR: Professional certification for EHR
  • athenahealth Launches IT Marketplace for Providers
  • Pennsylvania Health Information Exchange Continues Growth
  • Nebraska HIE Implements Improved Prescription Monitoring
  • Is it time to “damn the mandates” and forget meaningful use?
  • HIE best practices: Preparing for health information exchange
  • How Clinician Engagement Can Make or Break an EHR Implementation
  • What challenges will the next National Coordinator face?
  • Wide River TEC reaches REC milestone
  • Provider HIE Participation, Interoperability Test Exchanges
  • EHRA takes issue with timing in ONC certification NPRM
  • Do Data Exchange Roadblocks Affect ACO Development?
  • Frustration with Stage 3 Meaningful Use Continues to Build
  • MACRA Must Do More to Promote Health Data Interoperability
  • ONC Sets Up ‘Proving Ground’ for Health IT Interoperability
  • Healthcare Data Standards: Tool Assesses Breast Cancer Risk
  • Is the ONC taking a new approach to health IT certification?
  • HHS invests close to $1 billion in healthcare innovation
  • Former EHR exec gets caught stealing $60,000 from company
  • Top 3 EHR Challenges Facing the Healthcare Industry, Providers
  • EHR Vendors Find Their Place Among Office-Based MU Providers
  • What are top business challenges, prospects for physicians?
  • TX Hospital Blames Cerner EHR Implementation for Financial Woes
  • First DoD Site Completes Go-Live of New GENESIS EHR System
  • MITECH Act again aims to expand meaningful use eligibility
  • Rep. McDermott: OIG should extend safe harbor for EHRs
  • What is the future of standards for EHR, interoperability?
  • Natural language processing presents opportunities for clinical coding improvement
  • CMS to Host Call on 2017 Medicare Payment Adjustments
  • Reaction to Reopened Meaningful Use Hardship Exceptions
  • CCHIT to help national EHR-HIE interoperability
  • Calculating different EHR incentive payments
  • Epic EHR Implementation Hurt Earnings at Erlanger Health System
  • CMS Offers Guidance for Revised Meaningful Use Requirements
  • How to Advance Nationwide Data Exchange in Healthcare
  • Q&A with Maine Health Information Exchange
  • HIE use increases, becomes more sophisticated in 2012
  • Advocates Call for Immediate 2015 Meaningful Use Changes
  • CMS Answers FAQ on EHR Incentive Program Hardship Exceptions
  • Coalition Questions Authority of ONC Health IT Oversight
  • Cambridge Health Alliance agrees with BIDMC to join ACO
  • Patient Engagement May Reduce Healthcare Reform Anxiety
  • Accountable Care Task Force Outlines Rules for Value-Based Care
  • California health systems partner for health, HIT innovation
  • Practice Fusion promises readiness for Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • ONC, Kaiser Permanente discuss the role of health IT in patient care
  • EHR Adoption, Use Remain a Source of Frustration for Docs
  • VA Cerner EHR Implementation to Include 48 Deployment Waves
  • Perry County Memorial Hospital to Begin Cerner Implementation
  • Accurate, helpful feedback is possible with patient portals
  • Alabama HIE Joins SHIEC to Improve Rural Health Data Access
  • HIE Roundup: State and local HIE achievements in 2012
  • VT Health Information Exchange Makes Key External Connection
  • AACE Takes Diabetic Remote Monitoring Support to Congress
  • Unsustainable Workloads Could Lead to Physician Burnout
  • What does the eHealth Exchange mean to nationwide HIE?
  • Pa. Health Information Exchange Authority Gains 3 New HIOs
  • Extended EHR outage frustrates patients, staff in Colorado
  • AAFP Calls for Meaningful Use Overhaul, Other Reforms
  • ICD-10 contingency planning: Looking past October 1, 2014
  • Rewards, Penalties of EHR Incentive Programs Drive Adoption
  • Kansas REC receives EHR adoption grant extension from ONC
  • AHA and others continue challenge of the two-midnight rule
  • What Does Open Mean in the Context of EHR Interoperability?
  • Advanced EHR Use Will Save $78 Billion Over Next Five Years
  • Want real accountable care? Start watching your Rx habits
  • DE Health Information Exchange Improves EHR Patient Access
  • Carequality launches to advance HIE network interoperability
  • New ONC CHPL Site Will Enhance Health IT Product Comparison
  • EHR meaningful use incentives power towards $24 billion
  • What Resources Advance ICD-10 Transition Preparedness?
  • “We need a strategy to keep that $129 million in our region,” Law wrote. “Otherwise, we literally will be sending that money to other communities. MACRA is designed to be budget neutral, meaning that the punishment for one doctor is the incentive for another.”

    The timeline for those goals is already underway. On January 1, Medicare providers began collecting quality measure data for this first performance year. According to an infographic published in the American Journal of Managed Care, the data from this performance period will result in the payment adjustments in 2019.

    Providers will spend all of 2017 collecting performance data. In the interim, Medicare will provide feedback starting in 2018. By March 31 of that same year, eligible clinicians will be expected to submit performance data to receive a positive payment adjustment.

    According to AJMC, eligible clinicians can avoid negative payment adjustments for the first performance year by submitting any form of quality measurement data to CMS. While clinicians may not see a positive payment adjustment for selecting this path, they will not receive a negative adjustment either.

    Clinicians can also submit a partial year of reporting data or a full year of data. These may result in some sort of positive payment adjustment, the size of which will depend upon the clinician’s performance.

    In the El Paso area, the name of the game is getting as much of a positive payment adjustment as possible, Law wrote. Positive or negative payment adjustments have the power to seriously affect how providers in the area can continue to practice medicine. Provided more funding via Medicare part B, eligible clinicians can improve patient care and deliver stronger, more innovative treatments.

    In order to achieve that goal, healthcare professionals will need to leverage EHRs and other health IT.

    “To succeed, doctors in our region need the right health information technology and the right expertise,” Law said.

    “Doctors will need to track and report specific quality measures for MACRA, which is not straightforward. They will also have to make complex choices to ensure that they are on track to succeed. There are strategies that can help doctors automate their systems, prompt them to conduct screenings, and to aggregate data for reporting.”

    To serve the El Paso area, Law says the Borderplex Alliance, a non-profit offering consulting on economic growth, has established its Life Sciences Committee. With Law also serving as a chair of the committee, it aims to determine the financial impacts of MACRA and develop a detailed plan of how health IT can lead to positive payment adjustments.

    Leveraging strong health IT and EHR use will be imperative for all eligible clinicians nationwide. In an address following the Quality Payment Program’s final rule publication, ONC leader Vindell Washington, MD, MHCM, said that all eligible clinicians will depend on strong health IT and health information exchange to successfully report to the program.

    “We make clear that succeeding in Alternative Payment Models requires the effective use of technology,” Washington said. “In short, the Quality Payment Program recognizes and rewards the fact that health IT is foundational to providing quality care.”

    Dig Deeper:



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...