Electronic Health Records

Adoption & Implementation News

Clinical Decision Support Decreases Sepsis Mortality in AL

As part of an electronic surveillance program, clinical decision support helped reduce sepsis mortality by 53 percent.

By Kyle Murphy, PhD

- A pair of clinical informaticist consultants found clinical decision support (CDS) systems to have a positive impact on identifying instances of sepsis and reducing sepsis mortality at an Alabama hospital.

Clinical decision support and sepsis mortality

According to the research published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, the combination of a computerized surveillance algorithm and CDS tools amounted to 53 percent fewer deaths per 1000 cases (i.e., 40 deaths) as compared to the control group with 90 deaths per 1000 cases. When identifying sepsis identification more widely using IDC-9 codes, the former figure dropped to a still significant 41 percent lower mortality.

"We believe that the highly accurate alerts (sensitive and specific) in the system designed for this study minimized alert fatigue, allowing optimal clinician utilization of the system, and, when combined with the timely detection of sepsis allowed by the system, resulted in the positive outcome of significantly reduced sepsis mortality in the study population," concluded Sharad Manaktala and Stephen Claypool of Wolters Kluwer Health.

The real-time electronic surveillance of sepsis went live in two units of Huntsville Hopsital back in 2014. As the authors described, the system includes four different types of alert notifications for clinical staff.

  • Top five changes to watch for in Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • Five ways a cloud-based EHR can make meaningful use easy
  • MI Health Systems Implement Epic Healthy Planet Constellation
  • FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg Resigns Her Position
  • Recapping Important HIMSS 2016 EHR Interoperability News
  • WIRED in Wisconsin
  • How will the Stage 2 Meaningful Use delay affect ICD-10?
  • Ensuring Physician EHR Use Doesn’t Lead to Physician Burnout
  • Mass. HIE set for go-live
  • The Obvious Use Case for HealthKit Integration with Epic EHR
  • EHR replacement gone wrong: Who owns patient data?
  • Home health Medicare scam leads to $150 million settlement
  • EHR Integration Target of DoD EHR Modernization Subcontract
  • Key changes from Stage 1 to Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • EHR Use Shown to Negatively Impact Patient-Provider Relationship
  • HHS Nominee Price Criticizes Meaningful Use Requirements
  • Epic Implementation in Boston to Blame for Frustrated Docs?
  • EHR nightmares: Why treating EHRs like paper records fails
  • OIG to Continue EHR Incentive Program Payment Audits in 2017
  • Achieving meaningful use using outside resources: CIO series
  • 257K Meaningful Use EPs to Get Medicare Payment Adjustments
  • Meaningful use expected to make significant headway in 2013
  • AAFP Calls for Meaningful Use Overhaul, Other Reforms
  • Arkansas Legislature Considers Health IT Legislation
  • Medicare vs. Medicaid EHR incentives: What’s best for your practice?
  • Stakeholders Disagree Over How CMS Can Promote Interoperability
  • Customer Loyalty to EHR Systems Declines to 75% in 2016
  • Cerner, Duke Research Develop EHR-Integrated Cardiac Risk App
  • Quality reporting as a means of EHR collaboration, healthcare reform
  • Accountable care can get more out of healthcare, readers say
  • ONC Issues RFI on Defining Interoperability Under MACRA
  • ONC provides 2014 CQM resources for Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • AHA sues HHS over two-midnight rule, Medicare policies
  • What has physicians so dissatisfied with their EHR systems?
  • HIMSS survey: 80% of clinicians use iPads, smartphone apps to improve patient care
  • Sept 10 is physician deadline for Sunshine Act disputes
  • HELP Committee Works to Support 21st Century Cures Act
  • 2018 VA MISSION Act to Improve Health Data Exchange for Veterans
  • AMIA Urges FDA Improve Clinical Decision Support Regulation
  • Collaborative, accountable care continues its national rise
  • Crisp Regional Health to Launch Cerner EHR Implementation
  • Where do patient engagement and empowerment differ?
  • Who’s at the Forefront of U.S. Health Information Exchange?
  • DC HIE carries on without RHIO
  • Two-thirds of docs use mHealth; 60% want mobile EHR access
  • ICD-10 Coding Implementation Threatened by Partisan Politics
  • Ohio passes Medicaid telehealth coverage law
  • Will overconfidence spell trouble in Stage 2 Meaningful Use?
  • CT Struggles to Launch Statewide Health Information Exchange
  • PCMHs produce 21% lower healthcare costs for chronically ill
  • What to Accomplish After the ICD-10 Transition Deadline
  • What Factors Encourage Physician HIE Adoption, Use?
  • ONC Shares Updates on Health IT Certification Transparency
  • Advocate Health Care Replaces Cerner, Allscripts With Epic EHR
  • Unsuccessful eRx participants face payment changes
  • Medicare competitive bidding program to undergo OIG review
  • What does the Stage 1 Meaningful Use deadline really mean?
  • A personal case for utilizing health information exchange
  • AHA reaches out to HHS: Let’s collaborate on EHR and billing issues
  • How Clinicians Can Avoid MIPS Negative Payment Adjustments
  • 1.3M Veterans Opt Into Health Data Exchange with Private Sector
  • Did Meaningful Use Requirements Propel Hospital EHR Adoption?
  • AAFP: Complex MACRA Implementation Rule Requires “Step Back”
  • NC Health System Adds Epic Patient Monitoring Technology
  • ONC Trusted Exchange Framework Now Open for Public Comment
  • Family Physicians to Benefit from Clinical Quality Data Tool
  • AHA, HIMSS Discuss CMS Quality Payment Program Proposed Rule
  • Mobile EHR use slows as “digital omnivores” stick with PCs
  • Fitzpatrick Amendment Supports UDIs in Health IT Systems
  • Cerner Population Health Management Platform Gains Health System
  • EHR Vendor athenahealth Expands Scope of Healthcare Services
  • Allscripts to close 12 offices, 1 warehouse in North America
  • Community Hospitals Switch Paragon EHR for CPSI EHR Replacement
  • 1UPHealth Wins ONC API Innovation Challenge Using FHIR Server
  • Congress raises concerns about HHS handling of RAC program
  • Trump Administration Nominates Alex Azar for HHS Secretary
  • CMS tool helps providers determine meaningful use in 2014
  • Small Practices Express Concern over Effects of EHR Adoption
  • Program brings mHealth, medical reference apps to Gulf Coast
  • CMS Accepting New Promoting Interoperability Measure Proposals
  • WEDI: ICD-10 Implementation Progresses; Doc Practices Lag
  • EHR best practices: Adopting a health IT culture (Pt I)
  • AHRQ Credits EHRs, Health IT in Helping Decrease HACs
  • How will healthcare reform impact healthcare spending?
  • EHR Usability Depends on Practice Culture, Provider Needs
  • ONC video explains meaningful use transitions of care (ToC)
  • HIMSS, AMDIS Suggest Ways CMS Can Reduce Administrative Burden
  • Microsoft Surface dives into mHealth, telehealth tablet market
  • Lakeland, FL hospitals use EHR to monitor quality of graduate education
  • How Most Office-Based Physicians Utilize Health Data Exchange
  • AMIA Calls For Patient Access to Complete Health Information
  • Physician series: Richard Armstrong, MD, FACS, Pt. II
  • Are the Proposed Patient Engagement Objectives Going too far?
  • HHS Proposes New Substance Use Disorder Records Regulation
  • EHR Optimization Projects a Top Priority for Healthcare CIOs
  • Data breaches of EHRs underscore need to upgrade systems and adapt to changing times
  • Population Health Management Tools Unveiled at HIMSS15
  • Tavenner receives bipartisan praise during Senate hearing
  • Texas Health Honored for Advancing eCQM Collection, EHR Use
  • CMS Clarifies Meaningful Use Requirements for Public Health
  • The first provided information prompts for certain conditions (e.g., isolated tachycardia, isolated hypothermia). The second comprised diagnostic alerts for new positive sepsis screening results or indications of worsening sepsis for previously screen patients. The third category of alerts offered advice on evidence-based care sepsis care. Lastly, the four set of alerts reminded staff to acknowledge and comply with recommended treatment plans.

    As part of the sepsis surveillance system, nurses were responsible for alerting physicians about patients with sepsis diagnoses.

    The algorithms used as part of the surveillance had their roots based in work by both the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) and Health Information Management Systems Society (HIMSS) for CDS implementation, which required adjustments to EMR data, namely clinical documentation.

    Improvement accuracy in identifying cases of sepsis was another benefit of the computerized approach at Huntsville.

    "The electronic system had excellent accuracy for detecting sepsis or severe sepsis, with sensitivity of 95% for sepsis cases and 82% specificity, compared to the gold standard of physician chart review," wrote Manaktala & Claypool.

    The authors credited the sophistication of the CDS system at the Alabaman hospital with demonstrating clear improvements over previous attempts at the same end.

    "The sepsis screening algorithms used in the current study were based on standard IHI guidelines," they claimed. "However, these algorithms also contained additional specifications to adjust for comorbid medical conditions and medications. We believe that the complexity of the system’s algorithms are responsible for its high sensitivity and high specificity and are key contributors to the impressive outcomes reported in our results."

    Likewise, the system avoided the pitfalls of alert fatigue previously associated with electronic surveillance systems.

    "Previous electronic surveillance systems have either had issues with high alert fatigue, when they have been successful in detecting sepsis (high sensitivity with low specificity), or have had modest alert fatigue, but missed a significant number of sepsis cases (high specificity, low sensitivity)," Manaktala & Claypool continued. "Likely as a result of this, previously published electronic surveillance systems have not been shown to have a significant impact on mortality."

    Underpinning the improvements at Huntsville were the use of four metrics:

    Sepsis mortality was reduced in the study group, based on four assessments: (1) measuring sepsis prevalence and mortality using ICD-9 codes for sepsis; (2) calculating sepsis mortality over a period of time; (3) calculating sepsis prevalence and mortality using Angus implementation criteria; and (4) measuring sepsis mortality after adjusting for patient-level parameters.

    According to the authors, the timeliness of clinical responses to sepsis diagnoses was the deciding factor in preventing sepsis mortality.



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 1000,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...