Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

EHR Optimization a Focus of Upcoming ICD-10 Updates

A new guide aims to prepare healthcare practices for the next phase of ICD-10 implementation, which includes new codes and regulations on unspecified codes that will require certain EHR optimization efforts.

By Jacqueline LaPointe

- Many healthcare providers, whether reluctantly or not, have already implemented ICD-10 coding procedures and continued to provide care with the system in place. However, like many aspects of the industry, providers will need to prepare for upcoming updates and changes to ICD-10 on October 1, 2016.

EHR optimization key to next phase of ICD-10 implementation

To assist healthcare stakeholders, the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) has released a guide on how to manage ICD-10 post payment reviews and unspecified codes. Per the guidance, healthcare practices should also evaluate their EHR systems to ensure that coding errors have been reported. Many EHR systems are designed to suggest the correct ICD-10 codes, but some stakeholders have noticed that these systems are not perfect.

“While the correct level of ICD-10 code specificity has always been required for National Coverage Determinations, Local Coverage Determinations, other claims edits, prepayment reviews, and prior authorization requests, physicians were granted amnesty from post payment reviews due to unspecified codes,” wrote Christina Lee, MHS, RHIA, CCS, CPC, in the AHIMA newsletter.

Once the grace period ends on October 1, healthcare stakeholders should realign their ICD-10 resources to focus on unspecified ICD-10 codes, which could cause delays in claims reimbursement, explained Lee. Even though ICD-10 hinges on accuracy, there will be cases where providers will need to use an unspecified code.

  • EHR notes, data analytics help track off-label drug use
  • Congressional Intervention on its Way for EHR Use
  • Blumenthal: Finding the ROI in EHRs is still tough work
  • Three Vendors are Driving Patient Engagement and Portal Use
  • VA “routinely” sent unencrypted EHR data to external locations
  • EHRA: Interoperability will come as meaningful use progresses
  • Researchers Discuss Problems, Solutions to Patient Identification
  • What to Accomplish After the ICD-10 Transition Deadline
  • Surescripts Sees Health Data Exchange Growth with 26% Increase
  • Is Stage 1 more challenging than Stage 2 Meaningful Use?
  • Why are payers concerned with patient engagement strategies?
  • OCHIN Partnership to Improve EHR Use for Epic, NextGen Users
  • Why should providers continue with Stage 2 Meaningful Use?
  • Alaska legislature passes telemedicine bill to expand coverage
  • Taking issue with EHR use surveys and statistics
  • Texas MD Anderson endures second data breach
  • Allscripts Ties Precision Medicine to Stage 3 Meaningful Use
  • How CPOE Adoption Helps Clinicians Treat Stroke Effectively
  • EHR audits Q&A: Got your documentation? Then don’t worry
  • Strategic partnerships look to increase EHR, HIE adoption
  • VA: Telehealth Reached More Than 690,000 Vets during FY 2014
  • Obama backs Shinseki as VA wait list problems grow
  • RECs have aided 100,000 providers with EHRs, meaningful use
  • EHR Use Ineffective in Improving Heart Failure Health Outcomes
  • 3 Ways EHR Use, Access Boost Care Coordination Across Settings
  • Healthcare Mourns Loss of Cerner Chairman, CEO Neal Patterson
  • Physician series: Louis McIntyre talks meaningful use
  • Pinaxis wins EHR accessibility challenge with Apollo
  • MD Anderson Epic Implementation Led to Financial Decreases
  • FDA Takes Hands-Off Approach to More mHealth Technologies
  • Epic, athenahealth, Others Implement Carequality Framework
  • More Health IT Interoperability Criticism of #Cures2015 Bill
  • Will overconfidence spell trouble in Stage 2 Meaningful Use?
  • Is a Culture Change Critical for Health IT Interoperability?
  • 42% of docs fear mHealth will lessen their power over patients
  • National HIE, eHealth Exchange boosted by new collaboration
  • Cerner EHR to Streamline Care at IN State Psychiatric Facilities
  • Senators to FDA: Where is mHealth, medical device certainty?
  • How can HIE drive meaningful use, healthcare reform via HIT?
  • Interoperability, finances, participation still plague HIEs
  • A Call for Patient Matching Among Healthcare Data Standards
  • CHIME: CMS Must Align Meaningful Use, MIPS Measures in 2017
  • Cerner Most Likely Vendor to Replace Homegrown VA EHR System
  • What must providers do when their cloud-based EHR goes down?
  • More than half of ACOs nationwide contract with Medicare
  • Physician Feedback Key to EHR Usability Improvements
  • 5 EHR predictions for 2013
  • Massachusetts bill looks to HIT to help reduce spending
  • Recognizing Healthcare Interoperability as a Moving Target
  • Transatlantic ultrasound marks new territory for telehealth
  • Atrius Health recommends new direction for meaningful use
  • EHR Clinical Decision Support Alerts Overwhelming Physicians
  • How to Make the EHR Replacement Project a Successful One
  • Increased Physician EHR Use Tied to Medication Adherence
  • Office-Based Physician EHR Use Dips Below 60 Percent
  • How Will HHS Address EHR Implementation Issues?
  • Meritus Epic EHR Selection Came Down to Satisfaction
  • AHA Seeks 4 Changes to MIPS as Part of MACRA Implementation
  • Effective Patient Engagement Strategies Using Health IT
  • California survey shows low certified EHR use
  • RI Hospital develops use case for Google Glass in telemedicine
  • February Meaningful Use Attestation Deadline Looms for EPs
  • Halamka Sees MACRA as Replacement to Meaningful Use
  • Meaningful Use brings strain on public health reporting
  • HIMSS Weighs in on MACRA Interoperability Measures Debate
  • Two health systems receive HIMSS Stage 7 Award for EHR use
  • HITPC considers impact of CommonWell Alliance on HIE
  • Marketing meaningful use, accountable care to patients
  • Meaningful use to make providers more efficient, effective?
  • MU for mHealth? Why telemedicine should get better faster
  • Cost-cutting might be working as spending only jumps 4.5%
  • NCHS survey: Basic EHR adoption reaches nearly 40%
  • Improved Health Data Exchange at Heart of UVM Epic EHR Plan
  • NY Health Information Exchange Awarded $2M in CDC Initiative
  • Cerner, Children’s Mercy to Foster Pediatric Health IT Innovation
  • How Population Health, Payment Reforms Impact Telemedicine
  • Surescripts Facilitated Health Data Exchange Growth in 2016
  • Stage 1 Meaningful Use full payment deadline coming soon
  • Innovating in health IT at New York eHealth Collaborative
  • Meaningful Use Public Health Reporting Varies by State
  • AHA: Hospitals will be ready for ICD-10 in October 2014
  • Why data ownership, use could stifle health data sharing
  • Small Number of States Successful with State-Led HIE Use
  • Kareo, McKesson Lead the Way in EHR and Health IT Systems
  • Testing, Certification to Drive Healthcare Interoperability
  • Epic EHR Implementation Contributes to Drop in Income at VUMC
  • Many HIM Departments Unprepared for ICD-10 Transition Snags
  • Additional EHR System Features, Interoperability Top 2018 Trends
  • Call for Nominations for HIT Advisory Committees
  • What decides the success of ACO, population health models?
  • OR Behavioral Health Center Adopts Carequality Using Netsmart EHR
  • HHS, Medicare appeals process taken to district court
  • New Epic Interoperability Features Enable User Collaboration
  • CCHIT to help national EHR-HIE interoperability
  • How does Stage 2 Meaningful Use challenge rural providers?
  • ONC, CMS to Take Part in Provider Data Accuracy Alliance
  • Heart groups promote interoperable cardiology terms for EHR use
  • Do Stage 3 Meaningful Use Requirements Need More Flexibility?
  • “The cyborg will see you now”: Will robot doctors assimilate into healthcare?
  • VA CIO Resigns Amidst Cerner EHR Contract Negotiations
  • “When sufficient clinical information is not known or available about a particular health condition to assign a more specific code, it is acceptable to report the appropriate unspecified code (for example, a diagnosis of pneumonia has been determined but the specific type has not been determined),” explained CMS in an ICD-10 Overview document.

    AHIMA advised that healthcare practices start by performing internal audits that identify and track patterns in unspecified clinical documentation and diagnosis code assignments.

    If the analysis shows that more specific ICD-10-CM (diagnosis) codes could have been used based on the clinical documentation, then practices should conduct trainings on proper coding techniques. On the other hand, if analysis shows that incomplete medical documentation resulted in unspecified codes, practices should refresh clinicians on appropriate documentation procedures.

    “While there are a few instances where usage of unspecified ICD-10-CM codes may be appropriate, widespread use of numerous unspecified codes should be the exception, not the rule,” stated Lee. “Practices submitting unspecified ICD-10 codes after October 1, 2016 may potentially experience an increase in post payment audits and quality reporting errors. As audits increase, so will payer requests for medical records and clinical documentation.”

    Additionally, healthcare practices may want to consider hiring a certified coding professional to assist with updating ICD-10 coding procedures and compliance policies, explained Lee. A coding specialist can help providers assess EHR code assignments, pinpoint software glitches, and provide ICD-10 training for staff.

    AHIMA noted that many practices may not be able to afford a full-time coding specialist, but there are cost-conscious ways to employ a professional. Practices could collaborate with other providers to share the cost, hire a certified specialist via a contract or a consulting arrangement, allow a current employee to complete coding certification, or employ an interim coding professional.

    The guide stated that common coding glitches include codes for motor vehicle accidents, joint replacements, and traumatic fractures.

    Looking forward, AHIMA predicts that more healthcare providers will experience challenges with the upcoming release of new codes as CMS ends the three-year code freeze. Practices may also face difficulties with statistical reporting because unspecified ICD-10 codes from 2016 will be compared to more specific codes in 2017.

    “A proactive approach to mitigate unspecified documentation, coding, and billing is the best remedy for post-grace period concerns,” reported Lee. “Now is the time for practices to consider hiring credentialed coding professionals and/or partnering with coding consultants. HIM professionals will become increasingly valuable as physicians prepare for the new wave of coding challenges ahead.”

    Assessing EHR systems and ICD-10 capabilities may be a worthwhile task for healthcare providers as the new phase approaches. A recent WEDI survey found that the majority of healthcare stakeholders surveyed stated that EHR and practice management systems facilitated a smooth transition to ICD-10 implementation.

    As the healthcare industry continues to change, ICD-10 is no exception to that rule. However, practices could benefit from AHIMA’s guide on the approaching updates, especially as EHR systems are restructured to accommodate more ICD-10 codes.

    Dig Deeper:

    Impact of ICD-10 on Smaller Provider EHR Use, Reimbursement

    Factors Contributing to Hospital EHR Implementation Success

    X

    EHRIntelligence

    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...