Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

EHR Optimization a Focus of Upcoming ICD-10 Updates

A new guide aims to prepare healthcare practices for the next phase of ICD-10 implementation, which includes new codes and regulations on unspecified codes that will require certain EHR optimization efforts.

By Jacqueline Belliveau

- Many healthcare providers, whether reluctantly or not, have already implemented ICD-10 coding procedures and continued to provide care with the system in place. However, like many aspects of the industry, providers will need to prepare for upcoming updates and changes to ICD-10 on October 1, 2016.

EHR optimization key to next phase of ICD-10 implementation

To assist healthcare stakeholders, the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) has released a guide on how to manage ICD-10 post payment reviews and unspecified codes. Per the guidance, healthcare practices should also evaluate their EHR systems to ensure that coding errors have been reported. Many EHR systems are designed to suggest the correct ICD-10 codes, but some stakeholders have noticed that these systems are not perfect.

“While the correct level of ICD-10 code specificity has always been required for National Coverage Determinations, Local Coverage Determinations, other claims edits, prepayment reviews, and prior authorization requests, physicians were granted amnesty from post payment reviews due to unspecified codes,” wrote Christina Lee, MHS, RHIA, CCS, CPC, in the AHIMA newsletter.

Once the grace period ends on October 1, healthcare stakeholders should realign their ICD-10 resources to focus on unspecified ICD-10 codes, which could cause delays in claims reimbursement, explained Lee. Even though ICD-10 hinges on accuracy, there will be cases where providers will need to use an unspecified code.

  • How is uneven HIE adoption affecting population health?
  • What will limit provider success in Stage 2 Meaningful Use?
  • Standardized Provider Data a Must for Health Data Exchange
  • AMIA Seeks Improvements to PCORI Data Access, Exchange Policy
  • Physician Employment Landscape Set to Change in 2015
  • Interoperability, finances, participation still plague HIEs
  • ONC requests clinical lab HIE data collection
  • CMS Extends Physician Quality Reporting System Deadline
  • MGMA: ICD-10 delay would increase time for testing, standards
  • Five ways to avoid potential ICD-10 productivity losses
  • HRSA launches new website, webinar for safety net providers
  • mHealth market to grow by 61%, will hit $26 billion by 2017
  • “Two-midnight” Medicare bill brings ire, approval, confusion
  • Using APIs in Healthcare to Make Patient Data Actionable
  • Is Stage 2 Meaningful Use a step in the right direction?
  • AMA Appoints Dr. David Barbe as its New President-Elect
  • HHS Interoperability Pledge Gains Major Support at HIMSS 2016
  • Do EHR Vendors Influence User’s Health Information Exchange?
  • CPSI Acquires Healthland, Expands EHR Technology
  • An Early Retirement for the EHR Incentive Programs in 2016?
  • Best Practices for Hospital Discharges to Post-Acute Sites
  • EHR Interoperability Imperative for Care Coordination
  • Primary Care Providers View Health IT Use in Positive Light
  • ONC announces next CONNECT User Group Meeting
  • CMS Wants Meaningful Use to Put Providers Back in Charge
  • Support for SGR repeal bill builds among physician societies
  • How a rural state manages to lead the way in EHR adoption
  • New Technology Aims to Boost Health Data Interoperability
  • Cloud-based EHR on the rise
  • AHRQ Studies “Wrong Patient” EHR Errors to Improve Safety
  • Will EHRs improve patient safety?
  • DeSalvo delivers first remarks to Health IT Policy Committee
  • ICD-10 Implementation Deadline Causes Concern among Providers
  • Surgeon General updates family health website for holiday season
  • Senate Passes SGR: ICD-10 Implementation Delays Unlikely
  • What Does EHR Interoperability Mean for MACRA Implementation?
  • HIE’s effect on ACOs and meaningful use
  • PCMHs produce 21% lower healthcare costs for chronically ill
  • Telemedicine gets increasingly popular with insurance plans
  • Exercise lowers 30-day readmissions by 34% for COPD patients
  • CPOE: Biggest challenges and best practices
  • Q&A: EHRs, meaningful use bring efficiency, quality to Kaiser
  • First and second quarter PQRS feedback now available
  • MGMA Questions Sense of Multiple Quality Reporting Systems
  • CMS Comment Period for Quality Payment Program Ends Dec. 19
  • ICD-10 will help physicians treat the “whole patient”
  • How is the physician shortage impacting rural Missourians?
  • Meaningful use benefits and concerns for a solo practice
  • MITECH Act again aims to expand meaningful use eligibility
  • VA details response to OIG’s recommendations at Phoenix VA
  • New Grant Program Advances Health Information Exchange
  • AHIMA provides EHR loans to underserved areas in Miss. Delta region
  • AHA aims to integrate behavioral health into care continuum
  • Research on Health Information Exchange Limited, AHRQ Finds
  • Aligning complementary programs is also important
  • Adding Consent-Based Exchange to a HIPAA-Based HIE
  • Tackling claims processing, payment management bottlenecks
  • Should HIE vendors follow HIPAA rules?
  • HHS FY 2015 budget to reduce Medicare-Medicaid fraud, waste
  • First Two Data Registries Accredited for Handling PHI
  • Are Additional EHR Implementation Resources Worth the Price?
  • Are Medical Residents Spending Too Much Time on EHR Use?
  • HHS departments seek flexible health IT to engage and communicate
  • DeSalvo Will Continue ONC Work while Focusing on Ebola
  • Florida Blue, Baptist Health Quality Network expand ACO
  • Navy eyes advances in interagency iEHR, HIE
  • Updates for Meaningful Use, Interoperability, Health Reform
  • Interoperability in health IT is a game changer
  • #Cures2015 Draft Adds EHR, Health IT Interoperability to Mix
  • Sixteen HIOs to form consortium for better HIE creation
  • Health IT Certification Criteria Stresses Interoperability
  • EHR best practices: EHR training for independent physicians
  • How has meaningful use affected the patient experience?
  • CMS: How to Report Only Once for PQRS, Meaningful Use, ACOs
  • ICD-10, Stage 2 Meaningful Use will challenge new HHS leader
  • MIT sets sights on open-source mHealth during innovation event
  • New fiber line links Montana HIE and rural health
  • KHIN connects HIE to CDC for population health
  • Putting Epic EHR Data to Work for Quality Improvement
  • ONC Expands Health IT Interoperability Standards Advisory
  • Direct messaging enables smoother transitions of care in Tenn.
  • Survey: Many healthcare jobs disappearing, taking pay cuts
  • Eligible providers made strides in meaningful use in 2012
  • Health IT Interoperability Continues Growth under DirectTrust
  • US Coast Guard Searching for Commercial EHR to Replace Epic
  • MedPAC Recommends CMS Simplify MIPS Reporting Requirements
  • What to Accomplish After the ICD-10 Transition Deadline
  • You may have been misinformed about Stage 2
  • EHR Data Helpful in Identifying Positive Drug Combinations
  • How Cloud-based EHR Platform Improves Remote Monitoring
  • Transition to Value-Based Care Requires Health Data Exchange
  • IHIE makes clinical quality measure scores publicly available
  • HHS plan for minimizing HIT risks to patient safety still missing
  • Providers reaching the critical point in ICD-10 education: Q&A
  • Providers look to Canada for lessons in ICD-10 implementation
  • 41% of Organizations Are Not Reimbursed for Telehealth Services
  • What are the basics of redesigning EHR system workflows?
  • Unsuccessful eRx participants face payment changes
  • EHR, accessibility, and meaningful dialogue in the clinic
  • Physician laments effects of EHR on documentation, patient engagement
  • “When sufficient clinical information is not known or available about a particular health condition to assign a more specific code, it is acceptable to report the appropriate unspecified code (for example, a diagnosis of pneumonia has been determined but the specific type has not been determined),” explained CMS in an ICD-10 Overview document.

    AHIMA advised that healthcare practices start by performing internal audits that identify and track patterns in unspecified clinical documentation and diagnosis code assignments.

    If the analysis shows that more specific ICD-10-CM (diagnosis) codes could have been used based on the clinical documentation, then practices should conduct trainings on proper coding techniques. On the other hand, if analysis shows that incomplete medical documentation resulted in unspecified codes, practices should refresh clinicians on appropriate documentation procedures.

    “While there are a few instances where usage of unspecified ICD-10-CM codes may be appropriate, widespread use of numerous unspecified codes should be the exception, not the rule,” stated Lee. “Practices submitting unspecified ICD-10 codes after October 1, 2016 may potentially experience an increase in post payment audits and quality reporting errors. As audits increase, so will payer requests for medical records and clinical documentation.”

    Additionally, healthcare practices may want to consider hiring a certified coding professional to assist with updating ICD-10 coding procedures and compliance policies, explained Lee. A coding specialist can help providers assess EHR code assignments, pinpoint software glitches, and provide ICD-10 training for staff.

    AHIMA noted that many practices may not be able to afford a full-time coding specialist, but there are cost-conscious ways to employ a professional. Practices could collaborate with other providers to share the cost, hire a certified specialist via a contract or a consulting arrangement, allow a current employee to complete coding certification, or employ an interim coding professional.

    The guide stated that common coding glitches include codes for motor vehicle accidents, joint replacements, and traumatic fractures.

    Looking forward, AHIMA predicts that more healthcare providers will experience challenges with the upcoming release of new codes as CMS ends the three-year code freeze. Practices may also face difficulties with statistical reporting because unspecified ICD-10 codes from 2016 will be compared to more specific codes in 2017.

    “A proactive approach to mitigate unspecified documentation, coding, and billing is the best remedy for post-grace period concerns,” reported Lee. “Now is the time for practices to consider hiring credentialed coding professionals and/or partnering with coding consultants. HIM professionals will become increasingly valuable as physicians prepare for the new wave of coding challenges ahead.”

    Assessing EHR systems and ICD-10 capabilities may be a worthwhile task for healthcare providers as the new phase approaches. A recent WEDI survey found that the majority of healthcare stakeholders surveyed stated that EHR and practice management systems facilitated a smooth transition to ICD-10 implementation.

    As the healthcare industry continues to change, ICD-10 is no exception to that rule. However, practices could benefit from AHIMA’s guide on the approaching updates, especially as EHR systems are restructured to accommodate more ICD-10 codes.

    Dig Deeper:

    Impact of ICD-10 on Smaller Provider EHR Use, Reimbursement

    Factors Contributing to Hospital EHR Implementation Success

    Continue to site...