Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

EHR Optimization a Focus of Upcoming ICD-10 Updates

A new guide aims to prepare healthcare practices for the next phase of ICD-10 implementation, which includes new codes and regulations on unspecified codes that will require certain EHR optimization efforts.

By Jacqueline LaPointe

- Many healthcare providers, whether reluctantly or not, have already implemented ICD-10 coding procedures and continued to provide care with the system in place. However, like many aspects of the industry, providers will need to prepare for upcoming updates and changes to ICD-10 on October 1, 2016.

EHR optimization key to next phase of ICD-10 implementation

To assist healthcare stakeholders, the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) has released a guide on how to manage ICD-10 post payment reviews and unspecified codes. Per the guidance, healthcare practices should also evaluate their EHR systems to ensure that coding errors have been reported. Many EHR systems are designed to suggest the correct ICD-10 codes, but some stakeholders have noticed that these systems are not perfect.

“While the correct level of ICD-10 code specificity has always been required for National Coverage Determinations, Local Coverage Determinations, other claims edits, prepayment reviews, and prior authorization requests, physicians were granted amnesty from post payment reviews due to unspecified codes,” wrote Christina Lee, MHS, RHIA, CCS, CPC, in the AHIMA newsletter.

Once the grace period ends on October 1, healthcare stakeholders should realign their ICD-10 resources to focus on unspecified ICD-10 codes, which could cause delays in claims reimbursement, explained Lee. Even though ICD-10 hinges on accuracy, there will be cases where providers will need to use an unspecified code.

  • AHRQ Report: EHR Integration Assists Lean Production Design
  • Telehealth law to create federal definition, provide guidance
  • SNOMED and LOINC team up ahead of ICD-10
  • Will Watson help solve the mystery of the missing DOD EHR?
  • VA Awards $19.6M Contract for Veteran Care Access Mobile App
  • How IHIE does health information exchange, interoperability
  • Stronger Patient Data Access Improves Overall Care Process
  • ‘Action First’ Vital in Health Information Exchange
  • CMS Reviews 2016 Meaningful Use Reporting Requirements
  • CMS Proposes Quality Payment Program Changes, Administrative Relief
  • Recapping Final Stage 2 Meaningful Use Modifications Rule
  • CMS Extends EHR Reporting Deadline for PQRS to March 13
  • Does EHR design limit the critical thinking of physicians?
  • Type 2 diabetics benefit from smartphone disease management
  • NextGen Healthcare, Cerner achieve bi-lateral certification
  • Epic EHR Best Supports Success in Meaningful Use Performance
  • Meaningful use of EHR systems begins with meaningful training
  • AMIA Urges FDA Improve Clinical Decision Support Regulation
  • Cerner Appoints Brent Shafer CEO, Chairman of the Board
  • Mobile health users test providers’ ability to drive patient engagement
  • EHR, population health, and the clinic community
  • Are non-physician-led PCMHs a bad thing for healthcare?
  • Kindred Healthcare signs strategic deal with Las Vegas ACO
  • InterSystems, Texas HIE Partner to Boost Health Data Exchange
  • Handful of EHR Systems Achieve 2015 ONC Health IT Certification
  • Stephen Fletcher is fired for health data breach in Utah
  • Midwestern states expand HIE with Direct secure messaging
  • Elliott Management Leverages Support for athenahealth Acquisition
  • Ambulatory EHR challenges from IDC webinar
  • Understanding How EHR Use, Adoption Impacts Physicians
  • Hospitals Use EHR Interoperability to Boost Care Coordination
  • HIE adoption saves millions for South Carolina hospitals
  • EHR attestation is based on a general patient pool
  • ATA to HHS: Reduce telemedicine restrictions for Medicare
  • Is your organization ready for the EHR replacement process?
  • Medical Data Exchange, Cloud Solutions Impact EHR Design
  • Can Japan Turn “Medical Receipts” into a Nationwide HIE?
  • FL District Court Dismisses Epic Systems False Claims Act Case
  • Study: Telehealth raises satisfaction, reduces hospital stays
  • ONC Seeks Improved Interoperability Standards Measurement
  • AHA offers recommendations for NIST Cybersecurity Framework
  • Can EHR social networks solve interoperability, HIE woes?
  • PA Doctors Win Big in Health Information Exchange Contest
  • Top Physician EHR Issues Disrupting Clinical Workflows
  • What does big data mean for health IT?
  • EHR Loyalty Shows User Satisfaction, Financial Investment
  • HHS Interoperability Pledge Gains Major Support at HIMSS 2016
  • EHR Downtime Drives TN Hospital to Invest in Backup System
  • CMS Reviews Clinical Quality Measure Reporting Options in 2016
  • VA claims processors got bonuses even as backlog grew
  • Caring for the homeless with co-existing EHR and paper records
  • CMS Requests Feedback on New eCQMs for Inpatient Hospitals
  • With or without incentives, long-term and post-acute care needs EHR
  • Top ICD-10 clinical documentation improvement pain points
  • Pediatric Standards May Advance Meaningful Use Requirements
  • Does MACRA Implementation Require New EHR Safe Harbors?
  • Researchers Call for Improving EHR Interoperability Policy
  • Allscripts Will Sell Stake in Netsmart, Ending 2-Year Partnership
  • What’s so important about thinking beyond ICD-10 compliance?
  • North Carolina Health System to Launch Cerner EHR Implementation
  • Providence Health & Services adds Dragon Medical 360
  • CMS Offers Training, Testing Tips for ICD-10 Implementation
  • VA Cerner Implementation Contract Balloons to $16 Billion
  • EHR compatibility and connectivity: two obstacles to patient care
  • OpenNotes Pilots Show Value of Patients Annotating EHRs
  • ONC Chief Science Officer Fridsma to depart federal agency
  • ONC Celebrates FHIR-Powered Interoperability Demonstrations
  • How DirectTrust Can Aid Providers with FHIR, Health Data Exchange
  • AMA, Medical Societies Ask Congress to Alter Meaningful Use
  • ONC Chief DeSalvo Faces Resistance to Current HHS Nomination
  • OIG allows hospital to give physicians access to free EHR interface
  • HITPC considers impact of CommonWell Alliance on HIE
  • Why major health IT implementations depend on communication
  • Study: Chronic patients gain more access to preventative care
  • Pew Calls on VA to Prioritize Health Data Exchange, Safety
  • Healthcare Execs Will Invest More in EHR Systems, Health IT
  • The missing link: Making the case for EHRs in behavioral health
  • Are public health information exchanges on the way out?
  • MHC Eyes EHR Integration, Interoperability, Meaningful Use
  • House Committees Back 2015 ICD-10 Implementation Deadline
  • How Clinician Engagement Can Make or Break an EHR Implementation
  • EHR System Transformation at Center of Penn Medicine Initiative
  • EHR systems and patient stories in healthcare
  • State HIE experiences show challenges, successes at HIMSS13
  • Meaningful Use Reporting Bill Draws Support of Industry
  • Connectathon 2013 to test interoperability
  • Lack of VA, DOD EHR progress leads Congress to yank the chain
  • Key advances in health information exchange emerge across US
  • How Does Competition Impact Healthcare Interoperability?
  • Health IT Developers Collaborate for Health Data Exchange
  • Wearable Devices, mHealth Can Lead to True Patient Engagement
  • HIMSS, AMDIS Suggest Ways CMS Can Reduce Administrative Burden
  • McKesson to Sell Several Ambulatory EHR Products to e-MDs
  • Call for Nominations for HIT Advisory Committees
  • HELP Committee Drafts Bill To Drive Patient-Centered EHR Use
  • GaHIN Awards $500K in Grants to Improve Health Data Exchange
  • eClinicalWorks Gears Up for Acute Care EHR Integration
  • What are the costs of data outages, downtime in healthcare?
  • S&P report: Healthcare spending declining
  • NY Tech CEOs Support Budget Approval for HIE Adoption
  • “When sufficient clinical information is not known or available about a particular health condition to assign a more specific code, it is acceptable to report the appropriate unspecified code (for example, a diagnosis of pneumonia has been determined but the specific type has not been determined),” explained CMS in an ICD-10 Overview document.

    AHIMA advised that healthcare practices start by performing internal audits that identify and track patterns in unspecified clinical documentation and diagnosis code assignments.

    If the analysis shows that more specific ICD-10-CM (diagnosis) codes could have been used based on the clinical documentation, then practices should conduct trainings on proper coding techniques. On the other hand, if analysis shows that incomplete medical documentation resulted in unspecified codes, practices should refresh clinicians on appropriate documentation procedures.

    “While there are a few instances where usage of unspecified ICD-10-CM codes may be appropriate, widespread use of numerous unspecified codes should be the exception, not the rule,” stated Lee. “Practices submitting unspecified ICD-10 codes after October 1, 2016 may potentially experience an increase in post payment audits and quality reporting errors. As audits increase, so will payer requests for medical records and clinical documentation.”

    Additionally, healthcare practices may want to consider hiring a certified coding professional to assist with updating ICD-10 coding procedures and compliance policies, explained Lee. A coding specialist can help providers assess EHR code assignments, pinpoint software glitches, and provide ICD-10 training for staff.

    AHIMA noted that many practices may not be able to afford a full-time coding specialist, but there are cost-conscious ways to employ a professional. Practices could collaborate with other providers to share the cost, hire a certified specialist via a contract or a consulting arrangement, allow a current employee to complete coding certification, or employ an interim coding professional.

    The guide stated that common coding glitches include codes for motor vehicle accidents, joint replacements, and traumatic fractures.

    Looking forward, AHIMA predicts that more healthcare providers will experience challenges with the upcoming release of new codes as CMS ends the three-year code freeze. Practices may also face difficulties with statistical reporting because unspecified ICD-10 codes from 2016 will be compared to more specific codes in 2017.

    “A proactive approach to mitigate unspecified documentation, coding, and billing is the best remedy for post-grace period concerns,” reported Lee. “Now is the time for practices to consider hiring credentialed coding professionals and/or partnering with coding consultants. HIM professionals will become increasingly valuable as physicians prepare for the new wave of coding challenges ahead.”

    Assessing EHR systems and ICD-10 capabilities may be a worthwhile task for healthcare providers as the new phase approaches. A recent WEDI survey found that the majority of healthcare stakeholders surveyed stated that EHR and practice management systems facilitated a smooth transition to ICD-10 implementation.

    As the healthcare industry continues to change, ICD-10 is no exception to that rule. However, practices could benefit from AHIMA’s guide on the approaching updates, especially as EHR systems are restructured to accommodate more ICD-10 codes.

    Dig Deeper:

    Impact of ICD-10 on Smaller Provider EHR Use, Reimbursement

    Factors Contributing to Hospital EHR Implementation Success

    X

    EHRIntelligence

    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 1000,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    MACRA

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...