Electronic Health Records

Use & Optimization News

EHR Vendors Still Seeing Low Physician Satisfaction Scores

The Peer60 report shows that most providers would not recommend their EHR vendors to a colleague, highlighting low physician satisfaction scores.

By Sara Heath

- Poor usability and lack of desired functionality are causing most physicians to be dissatisfied with their EHR technology, finds a new survey by Peer 60. However, EHR vendors can improve upon this by taking notice of physician satisfaction feedback.

physician-satisfaction-ehr-use

The Physician’s Take on EHRs 2016 report comprises a survey of 1,053 physicians about their EHR satisfaction using the Net Promoter Score, which takes the percent of physicians promoting the technology and the percent detracting the technology and gives it one holistic satisfaction score.

When polling ambulatory physicians, Peer60 asked about Allscripts, athenahealth, Cerner, e-MDs, eClinicalWorks, Epic Systems, Greenway, NextGen, and Practice Fusion, although the agency did not reveal which vendor received which score.

Overall, a majority of users gave their EHR vendors detractor scores. For one vendor, as many as 82 percent of users reported detractor scores. The highest promoter score was 40 percent.

  • Is it time to “damn the mandates” and forget meaningful use?
  • OIG: Most meaningful use hospitals lack EHR fraud safeguards
  • New ONC research on health information exchange now available
  • Making EHR personal for providers and patients
  • OMB Reviewing Proposed Stage 3 Meaningful Use Requirements
  • New VA leader targets interoperability, efficiency as goals
  • Why ICD-10 Is More about Quality Data, Less about Payment
  • WEDI survey: Delay caused ICD-10 testing to slip into 2015
  • #Cures2015 Draft Adds EHR, Health IT Interoperability to Mix
  • Arizona Overpays $14M in Medicaid EHR Incentive Payments
  • EHR Success story: a large California facility’s experience with EHR
  • EHRs, HIE should be patient-centric, not organization-based
  • 92% of Nurses Dissatisfied with EHR Technology, Health IT
  • Are we about to see the end of the complete EHR?
  • ACO End-to-End Solutions Go Beyond EHR, Pop Health Technology
  • CMS Provides Details about ICD-10 End-to-End Testing Weeks
  • Unintended Consequences of MACRA Requirements for Doctors?
  • Patients Harbor Little Concern for EHR Security Events
  • Behavioral Health System Invests Millions in Epic Implementation
  • Duplicate Patient EHRs Cost Hospitals $1,950 Per Inpatient Stay
  • Updates on Health IT Interoperability Progress from CMS, ONC
  • Five Ways to Boost Health Information Exchange in the ED
  • Slavitt: CMS Already Mulling Changes to MACRA Start Date
  • Industry experts voice plans for making good on ICD-10 delay
  • Physical therapy straw owner sentenced in Medicare fraud case
  • Do Meaningful Use Requirements Need the 5% Objective Back?
  • How price transparency helps accountable care manage costs
  • Is your ICD-10 transition headed for a Code Blue?
  • IHE, PCHAlliance to Launch Joint Interoperability Initiatives
  • New report reveals most connected US hospitals
  • Bill Allowing Behavioral Health EHR Incentives Passes Senate
  • CMS provides updates on ICD-10 delay, dual coding, testing
  • EHNAC responds critically to ONC RFI
  • Why EHR Clinical Decision Support Tools Need More Research
  • Will providers be able to benefit from meaningful use change?
  • ICD-10 survey: Vendors, payers barely creep towards readiness
  • Cancer Practice to Pay $26M for False Meaningful Use Attestations
  • Physician leadership marries clinical, management expertise
  • UPDATE: Final Rule for Meaningful Use Modifications Under Review
  • EHR use, provider communication linked to improved outcomes
  • HIPAA, HITECH Still Limiting Health Data Exchange Innovation
  • EHR-Integrated Tools Help Improve Chronic Kidney Disease Care
  • EHR Vendor Cerner Seals Siemens Acquisition Deal
  • Will EHRs improve patient safety?
  • 3M to Hold and Build Health Information Systems Business
  • EHR Data Integrity a Top Health It Hazard In 2015
  • Many HIM Departments Unprepared for ICD-10 Transition Snags
  • Health IT Standards, Interoperability to Gain Traction in 2017
  • Half of Medical Providers Lack EHR Interoperability Roadmap
  • Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center announces data breach
  • KLAS taps 3M as top medical records coding product of 2012
  • Enabling transitions of care through EHR, HIE workflows
  • CMS Proposes Meaningful Use Changes to Promote Interoperability
  • ONC to accelerate meaningful use with State Challenge 2.0
  • CVS Offering Prescription Benefit Information Through Surescripts
  • VA EHR Optimization Efforts a Concern for Congress
  • EHR Interoperability a Top Concern for Medical Students
  • AHRQ looking to new app to reduce emergency readmissions
  • Bi-directional Communication Affects ICD-10 Implementation
  • WEDI Clarifies Clinical Documentation in 2017 ICD-10 Guidance
  • Why CMS chose 2015 as the deadline for ICD-10 compliance
  • ONC to Promote Interoperability in Patient Matching Challenge
  • AHA Explains Industry Challenges for EHR Interoperability
  • As Adoption Slows, the Market Must Embrace EHR Interoperability
  • Health IT Interoperability Champion DeSalvo Leaving ONC
  • What’s keeping hospitals from addressing the revenue cycle?
  • UK Hospital Earns Most Wired for Use of Epic EHR Technology
  • CMS Extends Deadline for April ICD-10 End-to-End Testing
  • 35% of EHR users will increase investment in patient portals
  • Return of Annual Updates to ICD-10 Code Set Begin Oct. 1
  • Boulder Community back online after lengthy EHR outage
  • HIMSS issues ICD-10 implementation recommendations
  • EHR systems require backup plans
  • FDA won’t regulate medical device data systems, image storage
  • EHR Meaningful Use Fraud Draws Attention of Congress
  • AHA opposes proposed home health audit, payment procedures
  • EHR Use Shows Little Impact on Improving Revenue, Operations
  • How Strong Health Data Governance Ensures EHR Data Integrity
  • How to Select the Right EHR Replacement Vendor, System
  • Health IT Interoperability Continues Growth under DirectTrust
  • MGMA Requests Immediate Provider Notifications for MIPS 2017
  • What’s behind the 17% EHR Incentive Program dropout rate?
  • NYC, Albany area HIEs connect with Direct secure messaging
  • Quincy Medical Group joins IHS ACO
  • West Texas HIE Adds Two Key Regional Participants
  • Can EHR data calculate a useful risk score for readmissions?
  • Why Don’t 35% of Patients Know that Patient Portals Exist?
  • State medical boards adopt updated telemedicine guidelines
  • Why is establishing standards of EHR use important?
  • EHR, Management Systems Facilitated Transition to ICD-10
  • EHR backlash takes aim at ineffective, impersonal care
  • Group contracted to study DoD-VA iEHR migration at Pacific JITC
  • CMS to Update eCQM Value Sets for 2017 Reporting Period
  • UDIs to impact Stage 3 Meaningful Use, population health?
  • House Committees Back 2015 ICD-10 Implementation Deadline
  • Simple, connected mHealth is the key to patient engagement
  • How is health IT innovation transforming among providers?
  • Providence Health & Services adds Dragon Medical 360
  • AAFP Requests Simplified Quality Payment Program Requirements
  • Sustaining regional HIE in Upstate New York
  • In all, the NPS for ambulatory EHRs were -45 percent, -51 percent, -68 percent, -48 percent, -24 percent, -73 percent, -42 percent, -59 percent, and five percent. These figures show that a majority of physician EHR users have an extremely negative view of their technologies.

    For acute care EHRs, Peer60 polled users about Allscripts, Cerner, Epic Systems, and VistA. The highest detractor score was 70 percent, while the highest promoter score was 42 percent. In total, these EHR vendors received NPS of -65 percent, -64 percent, -38 percent, and 0 percent.

    According to the researchers, these low satisfaction rates are likely due to growing physician needs. As providers feel the push toward value-based reimbursement and care models, they need better functionality from their EHRs that will support their evolving clinical workflows.

    Thirty percent of providers said they need their EHRs to display patient satisfaction data and 15 percent said they needed a patient portal alongside their EHR. Twenty-two percent said they need the technology to support their alternative payment models, while 25 percent specifically said the EHR should support accountable care.

    Only six percent of respondents said they don’t need any added functionality.

    Although physicians have low opinions of their EHR vendors, and have reported several desired capabilities, they don’t see the light at the end of the tunnel, the researchers said. Very few survey respondents reported plans to switch their EHRs for better functionality.

    Nine percent of acute care practices are looking to replace their EHRs, as are 11 percent of ambulatory practice physicians. However, Peer60 expects these figures to grow.

    “If things stay as they are, physician dissatisfaction will metastasize to encompass the majority of the organization and replacement rates will almost certainly increase in coming years,” the researchers said. “We’ve said it before—physicians and other caregivers are the sleeping giants of healthcare.”

    In order to survive in the EHR industry, vendors will need to ensure they put provider and patient needs and preferences first, the researchers asserted.

    “For years, caregivers’ satisfaction with clinical documentation systems has been regarded as second class perspective,” they wrote in the survey report. “While the level of importance placed on improvements to EHR systems should be #1 patients, #2 caregivers, and #3 IT leadership, it feels as though caregivers and patients take a backseat to meeting the requirements of other stakeholders.”

    Taking this approach would serve EHR vendors well with first-time EHR adopters, too. After all, 34 percent of ambulatory physicians who do not currently have an EHR plan to get on in the near future. Although this is not the majority, Peer60 said, it is a promising amount.

    Overall, the EHR vendor that can tap into physician needs and begin to improve on physician satisfaction will end up having significant market influence, Peer60 concluded.

    “The EHR supplier that cracks the code of frontline user satisfaction (which doesn’t exist anywhere today) will have a competitive advantage unparalleled in this segment of healthcare,” Peer60 said.

    “Imagine a supplier that had an army of caregivers behind it, spreading the sweet, sweet message of real usability? The bubble-up effect would be impossible to ignore.”

    Dig Deeper:

    X

    EHRIntelligence

    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...