Electronic Health Records

Use & Optimization News

EHR Vendors Still Seeing Low Physician Satisfaction Scores

The Peer60 report shows that most providers would not recommend their EHR vendors to a colleague, highlighting low physician satisfaction scores.

By Sara Heath

- Poor usability and lack of desired functionality are causing most physicians to be dissatisfied with their EHR technology, finds a new survey by Peer 60. However, EHR vendors can improve upon this by taking notice of physician satisfaction feedback.

physician-satisfaction-ehr-use

The Physician’s Take on EHRs 2016 report comprises a survey of 1,053 physicians about their EHR satisfaction using the Net Promoter Score, which takes the percent of physicians promoting the technology and the percent detracting the technology and gives it one holistic satisfaction score.

When polling ambulatory physicians, Peer60 asked about Allscripts, athenahealth, Cerner, e-MDs, eClinicalWorks, Epic Systems, Greenway, NextGen, and Practice Fusion, although the agency did not reveal which vendor received which score.

Overall, a majority of users gave their EHR vendors detractor scores. For one vendor, as many as 82 percent of users reported detractor scores. The highest promoter score was 40 percent.

  • Summarizing New Streamlined Clinical Quality Measures at CMS
  • Class-action lawsuit filed against Allscripts in Florida
  • Vanderbilt Readies for $200M System-Wide Epic Implementation
  • School health information exchange off to slow start in PA
  • Cerner Head Talks “Negative Information” on VA Cerner EHR Contract
  • Surescripts Network Expands EHR Interoperability at Point of Care
  • Halamka Sees MACRA as Replacement to Meaningful Use
  • Midland Health Chooses Cerner for System-Wide Implementation
  • Staffing your EHR implementation
  • Georgia Regents, Cerner reimagine EHR vendor relationships
  • ICD-10 Best Practices: Brace for impact
  • Western NY Beacon boosts HIE, EHR use, care coordination
  • AHIMA Fuels Clinical Documentation Improvement with New Toolkits
  • Integrating medical devices into the EMR, data repository
  • How Meaningful Use Requirements Hinder EHR Interoperability
  • ePrescribing Expected and Preferred in 82% of Older Patients
  • AMA Tabs Stage 3 Meaningful Use a Top 2016 Health IT Concern
  • CIO series: Cloud EHR, virtualization with ARcare’s Greg Wolverton
  • CMS Builds Meaningful Use Public Health Reporting Repository
  • Engaging Physicians to Aid Standardized Ambulatory EHR Use
  • Tenn. allowed speedy EHR access during meningitis emergency
  • Telehealth roundup: Chronic disease management takes the stage
  • HHS announces Stage 2 Meaningful Use final rule
  • What’s behind the 17% EHR Incentive Program dropout rate?
  • How Physician EHR Use Can Lead Patients to New Therapies
  • Researchers link DNA with EHRs, leverage data for genomic research
  • Positioning EHR, clinical documentation to support physician-patient interaction
  • Illinois Procurement Board Upholds $62M UI Epic EHR Contract
  • CMS seeks volunteers for end-to-end ICD-10 testing in 2015
  • Carestream Vue RIS Becomes Meaningful Use Certified
  • EHR Vendors Find Their Place Among Office-Based MU Providers
  • What obstacles might undermine the promise of mHealth?
  • CMS Proposes Meaningful Use Changes to Promote Interoperability
  • VA finds wait-list errors, but no conclusive proof for deaths
  • Why communication is essential for health IT consulting
  • How could cost prevent health IT from driving patient engagement?
  • WEDI, EHNAC partner to accelerate HIE adoption through Direct
  • Innovating in health IT at New York eHealth Collaborative
  • Physicians Spend Less When EHRs Default to Generic Drugs
  • Cerner Sees Benefit to API Development in CMS IPPS Proposed Rule
  • Physician Perspectives on EHR Optimization Strategies
  • How to Boost Clinical Efficiency During Health IT Adoption
  • ONC Embraces Industry-led Testing of Health IT Tools
  • ONC, Louisiana celebrate Crescent City Beacon Community
  • Evaluating EHR trouble spots can help boost performance
  • Meaningful Use Workgroup tackles EHR clinical documentation
  • Allscripts CEO Tullman Resigns, Black Named Replacement
  • Physician EHR, HIE use growing globally in Accenture survey
  • Patients Harbor Little Concern for EHR Security Events
  • Direct messaging enhances Kansas HIE
  • ACOs doubled during past year, Medicare outpaced commercial
  • OR Behavioral Health Center Adopts Carequality Using Netsmart EHR
  • Medicare competitive bidding program to undergo OIG review
  • EHR Analysis Reveals HCV Screening Gap at Health Centers
  • ONC EHR Oversight Rule Needs Better Testing Process, Pew Says
  • How Can Providers, HIEs Partner to Achieve Interoperability?
  • EHRs and the worsening diabetes epidemic
  • Epic EHR Implementation Cited in Denver Health CEO’s Departure
  • Why EHR Clinical Decision Support Tools Need More Research
  • Will payment adjustments boost meaningful use participation?
  • Direct lab access may boost patient engagement, involvement
  • South Carolina Docs to Tackle Health IT Interoperability
  • Court dings CA county for mishandled EHR implementation
  • CMS Details Quality Payment Program Technical Assistance
  • What does patient experience mean to accountable care, ACOs?
  • ONC highlights EHR adoption by community health centers
  • ONC to Maintain $60M Budget to Support 21st Century Cures Act
  • ONC Chief Emphasizes Commitments Toward Connected Health IT
  • Has EHR usability suffered for the sake of adoption speed?
  • PHR app wins latest Blue Button Innovation challenge
  • Why Are So Few Healthcare Providers Using EHR Data Analytics?
  • NC Medicaid payment system subject of class action lawsuit
  • ONC Promotes Health IT Interoperability with New Tech Lab
  • Two GA Healthcare Centers to Share Single Epic EHR Platform
  • Using personalization to increase physician EHR adoption
  • AT&T reveals top 5 healthcare IT, mHealth trends for 2013
  • Will the DoD EHR Modernization Project Stay on Schedule?
  • What impact does Version 5010 have on ICD-10?
  • Eligible providers made strides in meaningful use in 2012
  • CPeH Supports Scheduled Roll-out of Stage 3 Meaningful Use
  • Meaningful Use, ICD-10, Epic, Cerner Lead Top 2015 Headlines
  • Should ONC decertify EHRs that block interoperability?
  • Epic, Greenway achieve EHR interoperability, exchange CCDs
  • AHIMA names 2014 Board President/Chair, other members
  • Patients Associate Secure Email Exchange and Better Health
  • EHR attestation is based on a general patient pool
  • Why is true interoperability crucial to healthcare’s future?
  • Alpha II Registry Approved as 2017 MIPS Qualified Registry
  • ACO Health IT, EHR Use May Point to Needed Policy Changes
  • 4 Initiatives Advancing Healthcare Interoperability in 2017
  • Care Coordination Paramount as New ACO Models Roll Out
  • Have EHRs, CPOE set the stage for ICD-10 acceptance?
  • EHR Use Shows Little Impact on Improving Revenue, Operations
  • Regenstrief Confirms Commitment to Health Data Standardization
  • Epic Systems Wins $940M in TCS Dispute over Trade Secrets
  • Provider Burnout Increasing Due to Meaningful Use Burdens
  • PA’s Health Information Exchange Awards $674K to Hospitals
  • AHA offers recommendations for NIST Cybersecurity Framework
  • Managing EHR Optimization in Absence of Physician Champions
  • MU for mHealth? Why telemedicine should get better faster
  • In all, the NPS for ambulatory EHRs were -45 percent, -51 percent, -68 percent, -48 percent, -24 percent, -73 percent, -42 percent, -59 percent, and five percent. These figures show that a majority of physician EHR users have an extremely negative view of their technologies.

    For acute care EHRs, Peer60 polled users about Allscripts, Cerner, Epic Systems, and VistA. The highest detractor score was 70 percent, while the highest promoter score was 42 percent. In total, these EHR vendors received NPS of -65 percent, -64 percent, -38 percent, and 0 percent.

    According to the researchers, these low satisfaction rates are likely due to growing physician needs. As providers feel the push toward value-based reimbursement and care models, they need better functionality from their EHRs that will support their evolving clinical workflows.

    Thirty percent of providers said they need their EHRs to display patient satisfaction data and 15 percent said they needed a patient portal alongside their EHR. Twenty-two percent said they need the technology to support their alternative payment models, while 25 percent specifically said the EHR should support accountable care.

    Only six percent of respondents said they don’t need any added functionality.

    Although physicians have low opinions of their EHR vendors, and have reported several desired capabilities, they don’t see the light at the end of the tunnel, the researchers said. Very few survey respondents reported plans to switch their EHRs for better functionality.

    Nine percent of acute care practices are looking to replace their EHRs, as are 11 percent of ambulatory practice physicians. However, Peer60 expects these figures to grow.

    “If things stay as they are, physician dissatisfaction will metastasize to encompass the majority of the organization and replacement rates will almost certainly increase in coming years,” the researchers said. “We’ve said it before—physicians and other caregivers are the sleeping giants of healthcare.”

    In order to survive in the EHR industry, vendors will need to ensure they put provider and patient needs and preferences first, the researchers asserted.

    “For years, caregivers’ satisfaction with clinical documentation systems has been regarded as second class perspective,” they wrote in the survey report. “While the level of importance placed on improvements to EHR systems should be #1 patients, #2 caregivers, and #3 IT leadership, it feels as though caregivers and patients take a backseat to meeting the requirements of other stakeholders.”

    Taking this approach would serve EHR vendors well with first-time EHR adopters, too. After all, 34 percent of ambulatory physicians who do not currently have an EHR plan to get on in the near future. Although this is not the majority, Peer60 said, it is a promising amount.

    Overall, the EHR vendor that can tap into physician needs and begin to improve on physician satisfaction will end up having significant market influence, Peer60 concluded.

    “The EHR supplier that cracks the code of frontline user satisfaction (which doesn’t exist anywhere today) will have a competitive advantage unparalleled in this segment of healthcare,” Peer60 said.

    “Imagine a supplier that had an army of caregivers behind it, spreading the sweet, sweet message of real usability? The bubble-up effect would be impossible to ignore.”

    Dig Deeper:

    X

    EHRIntelligence

    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 1000,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    MACRA

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...