Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

HHS Nominee Price Criticizes Meaningful Use Requirements

The nominee for HHS Secretary addressed the value of electronic health record implementation and the negative impact of meaningful use requirements in a recent Senate hearing.

Meaningful Use

Source: Thinkstock

By Kate Monica

- On Jan 18, 2017, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, & Pensions (HELP) held a hearing on the nomination of Representative Tom Price, MD, (R-GA) for the lead role at the Department of Health & Human Services.

Among the matters discussed during the nearly four-hour hearing were the benefits of EHR adoption and use to the healthcare industry, namely provider productivity.

Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) voiced his hesitance over further federal support for EHR implementation based on concerns tied to its potential negative impact on the healthcare industry. 

“I am skeptical about electronic health records and their negative impact on productivity,” Cassidy stated. “MD Anderson just laid off 5 percent of staff. They’re blaming it on financial losses related to decreased directly attributable to the implementation of EHR.”

To which, Rep. Price made the following remarks on EHR benefits.

 “Electronic health records are so important because from an innovative standpoint they allow patients to have their health history with them at all times and allow whatever physicians or other provider access to that. We in the government have a role in that but that role should be interoperability to make certain different systems can talk to each other,” he said.

While Price believes EHR technology is important to patient care and ensuring interoperability in the healthcare industry, he maintained that the EHR Incentive Programs and their meaningful use requirements serve to obstruct rather than encourage provider productivity and positive health outcomes.

 “I have had more than one physician tell me the final regulations and rules related to meaningful use requirements were the final straw for them and they quit. When that happens we lose incredible intellectual capital in our society that can care for people,” Price added.

Meaningful use requirements have drawn criticism from many in the healthcare industry as two stringent, restrictive, and burdensome since their inception. As recently as last month, the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME) published a letter recommending policymakers improve the flexibility of meaningful use requirements to better suit the needs of hospitals and physicians.

The recommendations CHIME sees as conducive to improving productivity for providers include a single set of health IT standards to promote seamless health data exchange, aligned quality reporting requirements across provider settings, and 90-day meaningful use reporting periods for 2017 and 2018.

“We are deeply concerned with CMS’ decision to push forward with timelines that call for Stage 3 and Stage 3-like measures beginning in 2018,” the letter stated. “Both vendors and providers need time to prepare for the requirements. For vendors that means development time and for providers that means testing and deployment.”

When asked how he plans to mitigate productivity losses resulting from meaningful use requirements, Rep. Price recommended fewer quality reporting requirements focus on outcomes rather than provider actions:

Cassidy echoed the concern that EHR technology gets in the way of the patient-physician relationship.

“We’ve turned many physicians and providers into data entry clerks,” Price said. “It detracts from their productivity but it detracts also from their ability to provide quality care.”



Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

EHR Optimization
EHR Interoperability

White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

Our privacy policy

no, thanks

Continue to site...