Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

Hospital Groups Call for Avoiding Another ICD-10 Delay

By Kyle Murphy, PhD

Hospital groups have written a letter to leaders of Congress asking the latter to avoid another ICD-10 delay.

- With less than ten months to go before healthcare organizations and providers need to comply with most recent ICD-10 transition deadline, the standoff between proponents and opponents of the 2015 ICD-10 compliance date is increasing in intensity.

Health Info Exchange

A band of hospital and health system associations have written a letter to leaders of Congress asking the latter to avoid another ICD-10 delay. A total of eight industry groups have undersigned the petition:

  • America’s Essential Hospitals
  • American Hospital Association
  • Association of American Medical Colleges
  • Catholic Health Association of the United States
  • Children’s Hospital Association
  • National Association of Psychiatric Health Systems
  • Premier healthcare alliance
  • VHA Inc.

“As the organizations representing more than 5,000 hospitals and health systems across the country, we strongly support the announced October 1, 2015 ICD-10 compliance date and oppose any steps to delay,” the organizations write. “Recent ICD-10 implementation delays have been disruptive and costly for hospitals and health systems, as well as to health care delivery innovation, payment reform, public health, and health care payment.”

The letter to Representatives John Boehner (R-OH) and Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senators Harry Reid (D-NV) and Mitch McConnell (R-KY) specifically recalls the setbacks resulting from the most recent one-year delay of ICD-10 implementation from 2014 to 2015:

  • Ambulatory EHR Market to Become $5.2B Industry by 2021
  • Queen’s Medical Center shares patient data with Hawaii HIE
  • Epic, Cerner Win Most EHR Contracts Among Community Hospitals
  • US, UK to collaborate on health IT to improve patient care
  • Is EHR vendor cooperation the key to true interoperability?
  • Judy Faulkner: Epic Will Offer New Cost-Effective EHR Options
  • ACOs Still Battling Health Data Exchange Difficulties
  • Electronic Health Data Exchange Eludes Small, Rural Hospitals
  • Hawai’i growing out HIE program
  • Senators form alliance to promote expansion of telehealth
  • VA Hearing Confirms Plan to Adopt Commercial EHR Technology
  • Safety Huddles Prove Useful to Ensuring EHR Patient Safety
  • DoD MHS GENESIS EHR System Deemed Ineffective, Unsuitable
  • How 2014 Proved the Need for Long-Term Care EHR Technology
  • Can popular mHealth tool help post-surgical cardiac patients?
  • Consumer Group Calls on HHS to Improve Health Data Sharing
  • ONC Chief Science Officer Fridsma to depart federal agency
  • Why communication is essential for health IT consulting
  • Farzad Mostashari: Man On A Digital Mission
  • CMS Releases Batch Options for Meaningful Use Reporting
  • CMS Extends eCQM Deadline for EHR Incentive Programs
  • Can Enhancements to Patient EHRs Tailor PDMP Risk Indicators?
  • Using Epic EHR to Survive a Perfect Storm of Regulation
  • What is moving national health information exchange forward?
  • Health IT Interoperability to Enable Clinical Integration
  • ONC Seeks Input on Measuring Interoperability under MACRA
  • NHHIO Receives ONC Grant for HIE, EHR Interoperability
  • Where are the findings from the meaningful use audits?
  • eClinicalWorks EHR Receives 82% Physician Satisfaction Rating
  • Everything’s bigger in Texas, including newly expanded HIE
  • 275 Adventist Health Jobs Transition to Cerner for Partnership
  • ONC Clarifies Health IT Interoperability Under HIPAA
  • VA Secretary Shinseki resigns over electronic wait list scandal
  • Google, AMA Launch Health IT Innovation, Interoperability Contest
  • Lack of Interoperability Dominates VA Health IT Challenges
  • CMS tool helps providers determine meaningful use in 2014
  • New Jersey Overpays $2.3M in Medicaid EHR Incentive Payments
  • Arizona Health Information Exchange Rebrands to Continue Growth
  • How Patients Factor in the Health Data Exchange Equation
  • Florida Medicare fraud scheme organizer pleads guilty
  • The Biggest Cerner Corp EHR, Health IT Stories of 2015
  • Accountable Care, Quality Metrics Must Combine for Improvement
  • HIMSS Weighs in on MACRA Interoperability Measures Debate
  • DirectTrust Experiences Continued Growth in Health Data Exchange
  • Health Data Exchange Advanced in New Pilot Program
  • Delays in EHR Integration Ousted Epic Installation
  • Can small providers knock out ICD-10 “in a few weekends?”
  • Fixing VA culture, EHR, health IT could cost $17.6 billion
  • Why are mobile apps lacking for hospitals, inpatient care?
  • Why are hospitals choosing Epic over other EHR vendors?
  • California Teaching Hospital to Begin Cerner EHR Implementation
  • Cerner EHR Ranked Highest for 3rd Year in Nursing EHR Satisfaction
  • Can Japan Turn “Medical Receipts” into a Nationwide HIE?
  • Rural Hospitals Disagree on Efficiency of MEDITECH EHR
  • Provider Burden the Focus of ONC Health IT Certification Update
  • CIO series: Ardent Health’s Mark Gilliam
  • EHR Adoption Gaps Remain Key Barriers in Annual ONC Report
  • Reducing Alert Fatigue Prevents Pharmacy Medication Errors
  • Peter O’Rourke to Replace Robert Wilkie as Acting VA Secretary
  • GAO highlights low participation in Medicare EHR Incentive Program
  • One Barrier Stands in Way of Secure Electronic Messaging
  • HIE moves forward in VT with radiology exchange pilot
  • Relationship between EHR and patient engagement
  • How Changes in Primary Care Delivery Impact EHR Selection
  • D.C. launches Direct Secure Messaging HIE to replace defunct RHIO
  • Winners of the 2013 John M. Eisenberg awards announced
  • Furloughed VA closes benefits offices, stops health IT work
  • How long can Kansas HIE stay in power?
  • Improper physician payments, kickbacks lead to big penalties
  • One third of patients want mHealth interactions with docs
  • Patient Engagement Rises with Consumer EHR Satisfaction
  • Patients with PHR access more responsible, engaged, satisfied
  • ONC opens registration for health IT committees
  • MACRA Incentives Likely to Increase Physician Health IT Use
  • 359K Providers to Participate Alternative Payment Models in 2017
  • Survey: Hospitals slow to adopt accountable care, form ACOs
  • AHIMA 2012: EHR and the physician experience
  • EHR best practices: Adopting a health IT culture (Pt II)
  • US Immigration Dept. Sees Advantages of New EHR Infrastructure
  • How is accountability affecting rate of readmissions?
  • CDI Moves beyond ICD-10 for Revenue Cycle Management Gains
  • Mobile Devices Increase Need for Healthcare Interoperability
  • Is meaningful use too much of a hassle for radiologists?
  • Are there changes ahead in EHR vendor selection?
  • July 3: Deadline for hospitals to begin EHR reporting period
  • EHR Adoption and Meaningful Use at HIMSS15
  • HRSA webinar to help safety nets with HIE, interoperability
  • Rapid innovation like VA’s Blue Button is key to health IT progress
  • Meaningful use of EHRs brings providers nearly $18 billion
  • Why ONC Seeks New Authorities Over Health Data Blocking
  • CMS Issues Quality Payment Program Year 2 Final Rule
  • Group Seeks Changes to Meaningful Use EHR Certification
  • Patients Associate Secure Email Exchange and Better Health
  • Tailored Physician EHR Use Necessary for Evolving Industry
  • 42% of docs fear mHealth will lessen their power over patients
  • ONC: ACOs, new payment models will boost HIE participation
  • Fueling the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resource
  • 3 Things to Know about MACRA Implementation, MIPS
  • CORHIO adds Children’s Hospital Colorado to HIE
  • Accountable Care, Patient Portals Lag Behind Expectations
  • The delay added billions of dollars in extra costs. Many of our members had to quickly reconfigure systems and processes that were prepared to use ICD-10 back to ICD-9. Newly trained coders who graduated from ICD-10 focused programs were unprepared for use of the older code set and needed to be retrained back to using ICD-9. Further, training of existing coders needed to be repeated given the one-year delay. This results in a doubling of costs that are not productive. A further delay would only add additional costs as existing investments would be further wasted and future costs would grow.

    The advocacy by the hospital and health system associations comes shortly after Medical Society of the State of New York and Texas Medical Association called on their members to persuade Congress to implement two-year ICD-10 delay until 2017. Those provider association have highlighted the negative financial implications for physician practices if an industry-wide ICD-10 implementation failed on Oct. 1, 2015.  The letter’s timing of December 5 also coincides with the message delivered by the Coalition for ICD-10 following remarks by American Medical Association President Robert Wah, MD, that contained arguments against and jokes about new code set.

    Based on the types of organizations working in favor and against an additional ICD-10, a division clearly exists between hospitals and hospitals and physician practices. While advocates for the latter reiterate the readiness of their constituents, their counterparts see nothing bad negative consequences ahead for their members. And this division likely to puts to be any lingering doubts about the forces behind the most recent ICD-10 delay.



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...