Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

ICD-10 Compliance a Struggle for Some Physician Practices

By Kyle Murphy, PhD

- October 1 has come and gone, and nearly two weeks in to ICD-10 compliance most of the healthcare industry is relatively mum on the transition to the newer clinical diagnostic and procedural code set. More than likely, healthcare organizations and professionals are busy enough adapting to ICD-10 and its more specific set of codes.

ICD-10 a struggle for some physician practices

That’s not to say some are not speaking out or in support of ICD-10 compliance.

Two recent weekend reports in the Florida’s Crestview News Bulletin and Maine’s Bangor Daily News paint two very different pictures of ICD-10 compliance at the two-week mark.

Apparently, some physician practices in the Florida panhandle are going through the motions in adapting to the federal mandate for ICD-10 compliance which began back on October 1. Brian Hughes reports that medical offices are encountering difficulties with the code set.

  • EHR contract guide will help docs keep data after replacement
  • HIMSS: Interoperability Standards Advisory Needs More Detail
  • CMS Details Quality Payment Program Technical Assistance
  • California leads the nation in EHR Incentive Program payments
  • Ahead of ICD-10, where do payers rank on claims processing?
  • Care coordinators, guides help navigate complex “continuum”
  • AAPA EHR Toolkit Offers Best Practices for EHR Design, Usability
  • How consultants add value to your EHR adoption, project team
  • AMA seeks further delays for Open Payments system
  • EHR adoption significantly lower among solo, older physicians
  • ONC requests clinical lab HIE data collection
  • EHR best practices: Bucking the PowerPoint training trend
  • CMS Moves Meaningful Use Attestation System to Secure Portal
  • Halamka: ICD-10 deadline will set providers up for failure
  • EHR Incentive Program Exclusions for Low Broadband Speeds
  • Apple Debuts Patient-Centered EHRs With Health Records App
  • WEDI to examine payment models, HIT innovation in 2013 report
  • National HIE, eHealth Exchange boosted by new collaboration
  • GE Healthcare launches vendor neutral archive for patient imaging, data
  • How a rural state manages to lead the way in EHR adoption
  • VA Shares Vision for EHR Interoperability, Modernization
  • Is Meaningful Use Responsible for Limited EHR Usability?
  • Mercy Hospital St. Louis Achieves HIMSS Stage 7 with Epic EHR
  • CHIME, HIMSS decry lack of delay for Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • Task Force Grapples with HIT Product Comparison Framework
  • eClinicalWorks to Pay $155M for EHR Certification Allegations
  • VA Continues Pursuit of EHR Interoperability with DoD
  • ONC, Kaiser Permanente discuss the role of health IT in patient care
  • Aetna, Cigna Continue Push for Accountable Care
  • Tailored Physician EHR Use Necessary for Evolving Industry
  • Researchers link DNA with EHRs, leverage data for genomic research
  • IOM Panel Recommends Addition to Stage 3 Meaningful Use
  • Mostashari defends progress of meaningful use, interoperability
  • Mississippi telehealth pilot to tackle diabetes with tablets
  • Blue Shield of California, Inland Empire form ACO
  • Providers Look to Healthcare Analytics But Lack Strategy
  • Will other RECs become fee-based meaningful use consultants?
  • ICD-10 Implementation Yields 80% Success Rate, KPMG Reports
  • VA seeks new scheduling unit to work with VistA EHR
  • Dentists chew over competing diagnostic code sets for EHR use
  • Has Provider Support for Meaningful Use Waned Irreversibly?
  • Meaningful Use Changes Needed to Support Interoperability
  • Mobile EHR design hinges on developer-physician coordination
  • Managing a Successful EHR Implementation Extension Program
  • Meaningful use incentives get chopped under sequestration
  • ONC Chief Science Officer Fridsma to depart federal agency
  • Clinical Engagement Needed for Healthcare Interoperability
  • Allscripts taps winners of Open App Challenge at HIMSS13
  • Payments changes proposed for Medicare home health agencies
  • Why Prioritizing Usability Effects Better Ambulatory EHR Use
  • Patient Engagement, mHealth among Top Health Issues in 2015
  • ONC: Hospitals dramatically increase EHR, HIE adoption
  • Are EHR Vendor Contracts Hindering Patient Safety Research?
  • Widespread Health IT Standards Use to End Information Blocking
  • AHIMA: Half of providers plan to go ahead with ICD-10 anyway
  • Cerner HIT Supporting Population Health Management at TMC
  • Should employers use mHealth to track your mood, diet, sleep?
  • Suspension of RAC audits could cost Medicare $2 billion
  • Maine to assist veterans through health information exchange
  • Pennsylvania labs are ready for but not aware of HIE
  • IOD Inc. connects with Social Security through MiHIN Gateway
  • Cerner Revenue Down After Delays in VA EHR Contract Negotiations
  • Canadians tussle over EHR data due to poor vendor contract
  • Recognizing Healthcare Interoperability as a Moving Target
  • Survey Demonstrates Effectiveness of Secure Messaging in ED
  • Population Analytics Growing into Health IT Integration Role
  • Physician EHR Use Impacts Patient Disclosure, Communication
  • Nebraska launches Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
  • HIMSS Seeks Delay in Use of 2015 Edition Certified Technology
  • athenahealth Overtakes Cerner in KLAS Physician Practice Rankings
  • Can popular mHealth tool help post-surgical cardiac patients?
  • Partners Epic Implementation Causing Headaches for Some
  • Lawsuit Questions Electronic Health Record Sharing Costs
  • Improving Payer Engagement in Health Information Exchange
  • DE Health Information Exchange Improves EHR Patient Access
  • Federal Commission Calls for VA Commercial EHR Replacement
  • True engagement is about meeting patients where they are
  • What EHR systems can gain from cloud computing?
  • How EHRs can stop information overload, streamline workflow
  • Why is true interoperability crucial to healthcare’s future?
  • What EHR interoperability means to the patient experience
  • Health Information Exchange is a Tool, Not a Solution
  • OMB Reviewing Proposed Stage 3 Meaningful Use Requirements
  • EHR adoption benefits, challenges with AHIMA’s Lydia Washington
  • EHR Meaningful Use Fraud Draws Attention of Congress
  • CMS Answers FAQ on EHR Incentive Program Hardship Exceptions
  • HITAC Approves 9 Healthcare Interoperability Recommendations
  • ONC Announces Health Data Exchange Challenge Final Winners
  • West Virginia Overpays $296K in EHR Incentive Payments
  • Meaningful Use, Regulatory Burden Costing Providers Billions
  • New Committee to Operationalize Interoperability Framework
  • Negative effects of EHR systems on adoption and informatics
  • CMS Chief Highlights Keys to Successful ICD-10 Transition
  • EHR implementation timeline for small practices
  • How do patient portals improve the coordination of care?
  • Physician EHR Access Increased with Surescripts’ Tool
  • Why communication is essential for health IT consulting
  • AMA, Health2047 to Make Health IT Focused on the Physician
  • Physician series: Richard Armstrong, MD, FACS
  • Expand EHR knowledge for Stage 2 meaningful use success: Q&A
  • “Large practices and medical companies, such as Peoples’ Home Health, usually have coders on staff. Their only job is to enter the numbers into billing records and insurance reimbursement forms,” he writes. “For smaller offices like Dr. Herf’s and Mir’s, the increased coding tasks take away staffers’ time with patients.”

    Betty Jordan, the manager of physician practice of Abdul Mir, MD, views ICD-10 as more of a hindrance than a help.

    “It requires so much extra work. If my doctor treated someone for rheumatoid arthritis, there’s hundreds of codes. It’s got to be specific,” she told the Crestview News Bulletin.

    “It is horrible for a primary care doctor,” she further revealed. “For a specialist, they deal with the same things over and over. For us in family practice, we see all kinds of things. It’s overwhelming.”

    For an administrator at the practice of David Herf, MD, the challenge of ICD-10 compliance is the result of increased specificity being married to an increase amount detail.

    “It’s really, really detailed,” Andrew Linares told the news outlet. “Instead of just saying, ‘cyst of the arm or trunk,’ you have to get really specific.”

    For one of the physician practices, adapting to ICD-10 is akin to learning a whole new language.

    The climate in Maine appears much sunnier regarding ICD-10 compliance. Jen Lynds reports high levels of preparation among Maine healthcare organizations and professionals leading to a smooth transition.

    “Health care providers across the state began working Oct. 1 with a new system of medical codes that has them describing illnesses and injuries in more detail than ever before, and officials from hospitals and medical associations said earlier this week that they are prepared for the challenge,” she writes.

    According to Gordon H. Smith, the Executive Vice President of the Maine Medical Association, complaints are scarce as are ICD-10 implementation delays. Director of Communications for the Maine Hospital Association reports the same situation.

    That being said, leadership at Eastern Maine Medical Center are preparing for transition-related productivity decreases for coders and billers used to the previous code set. However, things are still proceeding as planned.

    “Our transition to ICD-10 has gone very smoothly here at Eastern Maine Medical Center,” Director of Coding and Clinical Documentation Improvement Mandy Reid told the Bangor Daily News. “We are using nine contract coders through outside vendors to support the ICD-10 go-live, and we secured them several months ago to be prepared. We also have added three positions in the outpatient area to help support growing volume, as well as ICD-10 coding.”

    The lesson learned so far is that a clinical practice’s ability to invest in ICD-10 preparation (e.g., training) correlates to its present-day confidence in ICD-10 compliance.

    X

    EHRIntelligence

    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...