- Several weeks following the implementation of the ICD-10 code set, the progress of the transition appears to vary according to size of the practice. While many large practices are reporting success with the transition, some smaller ones are reporting difficulty.
According to a blog post by the Coalition for ICD-10, many of the group’s members—which happen to be larger healthcare providers—are reporting great success with the transition. Many, like Centegra Health System, credit this success to the ample time for preparation they received.
“Centegra Health System was prepared for a smooth ICD-10 transition after two years of careful planning. Our information technology systems have been updated and our educational plans were deployed to help with the initial roll-out,” said Centegra’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Information Officer David Tomlinson.
Additionally, some coalition members stated that their success on October 1st is due in large part to their early implementation of the code set.
“Northwest Community Healthcare’s transition to ICD-10 has been smooth. This is due, in part, to our early clinical rollout of ICD-10 with our Epic Go-Live date of May 1, 2015,” said President and Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Community Healthcare Stephen Scogna.
Other members of the coalition, such as insurer Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, reported a few bumps in the road amidst a generally smooth transition.
““BCBSM’s ICD-10 implementation went very smoothly. Call center volumes and overall inquiries are very low. Professional and facility claims are processing as expected. A few issues noted, which we are resolving, but nothing major to report,” the insurer said.
BCBSM also reported that it was the first private insurer to reimburse the hospitals it serves.
“Received kudos from our hospitals stating that BCBSM was the first payer to pay ICD-10 claims and these claims are paying as expected. Hospitals are not reporting any major issues. Other Payers (Priority, Cigna, Aetna) are reporting the same experience in that they are not seeing any major issues.”
However, this success is in contrast to what some other smaller providers are reporting. The impact of ICD-10 on smaller providers is a little bit more weary as these providers have fewer resources to work with.
For example, Linda Girgis, MD, FAAFP, told EHRIntelligence.com that due to how small her practice is—she and her husband are the only physicians in the family practice—its workload has grown much larger. This work includes changing patient problem lists from ICD-9 codes to ICD-10.
"The doctors are doing it right now," she says. "I'm doing it as I come across different patients, but definitely it's adding time on to the workday."
Smaller practices are especially affected by ICD-10 troubles because much of their revenue comes from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and the agency has been reportedly unreachable throughout the transition.
"My biller tries to call every day. Since October 1, they have messaged that they are down due to technical difficulties so it's impossible to get through to any person there,” Girgis said.
Not receiving CMS payment is problematic for small practices like Girgis’ because those payments may amount to almost 30 percent of hospital revenue. While a larger hospital, like those mentioned above, may be able to do without 30 percent of its revenue for a month or two, this kind of issue could be potentially detrimental for a practice like Girgis’.
"Big organizations, hospitals, and groups can go a few months without 30 percent of their reimbursement coming in. But for small practices, that can be devastating," argues Girgis.
CMS set a timeline for rolling out ICD-10 payments, stating that those claims would be reimbursed within the first 30 days of the new code set. As that 30-day timeline draws to a close, small practices will be waiting to see if their claims are reimbursed.