Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

Making Patient-Generated Health Data Work for Providers

An ONC-commissioned white paper identifies actions necessary for enabling providers to benefit from this patient-generated health data among other federal policy considerations.

Policy for patient-generated health data

Source: Thinkstock

By Kate Monica

- The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) released for public comment a new draft white paper developed by Accenture Federal Services focused on the opportunities and challenges of realizing the potential of patient-generated health data.

Of particular importance to healthcare organizations and providers is a series of enabling actions the federal policy needs to consider to help clinicians make use of patient-generated health data.

Specifically, the white paper advises that a policy framework encourage patients and caregivers to work together with clinicians and researchers and determine how procuring, using, and sharing patient generated health data (PGHD) can be an asset in managing patient health.

Federal policymakers are also encouraged to support active patient participation in assessing the functionality and practicality of devices, particularly through direct feedback to device manufacturers.

  • Epic EHR outages in force Bay Area docs on to paper records
  • CMS Previews of Upcoming Changes to EHR Incentive Programs
  • Texas Health Information Network Joins Carequality
  • Anthem BCBS, Franciscan Alliance to launch ACO in April
  • Health plan certification compliance to impact providers
  • Will EHR Incentive Payments Help Integrate Behavioral Health?
  • Mount Sinai links genetics, EHRs for personalized medicine
  • Joint EHR costs skyrocketed to $28 billion, DoD says
  • CMS Launches API to Ease Quality Payment Program Reporting
  • HHS Annual Rate Review Report shows patient savings
  • Health IT Certification Criteria Stresses Interoperability
  • AHA Urges Congress to Enact Meaningful Use Flexibility Law
  • Former Allscripts CEO weighs in on meaningful use
  • Study: Single-payer healthcare system could save trillions
  • Concerns, Questions Surround Erlanger Epic EHR Selection
  • Eight percent of physicians receive value-based income
  • Catching up practice management software with EHR
  • Why major health IT implementations depend on communication
  • Professors denounce current EHR value
  • ONC officially turns NwHIN into eHealth Exchange
  • How HealthKit integrates with EHR technology; why it matters
  • Cost, Hospital Efficiency Still Major Barriers to EHR Adoption
  • How Meaningful Use Requirements Hinder EHR Interoperability
  • Geisinger Health, AtlantiCare enter strategic agreement
  • Why Stage 1 Meaningful Use success may mean Stage 2 failure
  • THSA Seeks Data on Cost of Health IT Integration, Interfaces
  • ONC Sets Up ‘Proving Ground’ for Health IT Interoperability
  • Arkansas Legislature Considers Health IT Legislation
  • Outcomes after ICD-10 Transition Deadline Look Promising
  • Do Ambulatory Surgery Centers Need Health IT Certification?
  • Meaningful Use Aligns with Health Information Exchange
  • IOM Panel Recommends Addition to Stage 3 Meaningful Use
  • The ICD-10 Implementation Deadline at Risk Due to House Bill
  • Funding to improve safety net hospitals via health IT
  • EHR adoption hits 96% in MA; half of patients engage online
  • What determines the efficiency of risk-based models, ACOs?
  • HHS announces Stage 2 Meaningful Use final rule
  • AMA wants to improve EHR adoption, minimize distractions
  • Permanent ONC-Authorized Testing and Certification Bodies (ATCBs)
  • Seven ICD-10 Transition Steps Medical Coders Should Follow
  • Group Seeks Interoperability Changes in Meaningful Use Delay
  • Physician series: Richard Armstrong, MD, FACS, Pt. II
  • Survey: 1/3 of healthcare workers to pursue new jobs in 2013
  • Solution for searching EHR unstructured data unveiled?
  • What eRx incentive exemptions mean for meaningful use
  • Are HIPAA Breach Fines Stiffer for ePHI Violations?
  • OIG Considers EHR Adoption, Meaningful Use Audits in 2015
  • GAO report: 43% of VA patients did not receive requested care
  • How competition, collaboration affect EHR integration
  • Texas MD Anderson endures second data breach
  • New Policy Should Accomodate Physician EHR Documentation Demands
  • Moving Beyond Healthcare Interoperability as a Buzzword
  • Does Healthcare Fraud Impact Meaningful Use Audits?
  • Is patient access to EHR being handled properly by clinics?
  • How to Properly Implement Patient Portals for Meaningful Use
  • CAC is a tool for ICD-10 improvement, not a magic bullet: Q&A
  • ONC, RECs seek to improve EHR adoption numbers
  • Physician series: EHR requirements for OB/GYN
  • EHNAC Finalizes 2016 Health Data Exchange Program Criteria
  • Aetna, Cigna Continue Push for Accountable Care
  • Seacoast Mental Health Center receives grant for EHR implementation
  • Joint Commission Program Targets Clinical Quality Measures
  • Looking forward: Readers face Stage 2 Meaningful Use in 2013
  • Easing HIT staffing shortages through education and training
  • EHR systems and patient stories in healthcare
  • CDI produces financial, clinical benefits apart from ICD-10
  • Medical scribe certification may ease EHR data entry burdens
  • Hawai’i growing out HIE program
  • AMA Sees Trouble in Departures of DeSalvo, Reider from ONC
  • What Payers Consider Ideal for Health Information Exchange
  • Surescripts Makes Record Finding Service Free to EHR Vendors
  • New York celebrates successes of digital health accelerator
  • Why EHR adoption doesn’t mean the end of paper in healthcare
  • National HIE, eHealth Exchange boosted by new collaboration
  • Greenway, eHealth Exchange Lead HIE Project in Oregon
  • ONC to Directly Review Certified EHR Technology, Health IT
  • Self-Service Models Missing from Patient Engagement
  • Task Force Says Federal API Requirements Need Standardization
  • EHR adoption predicted to reach 80% of family physicians in 2013
  • Five Key ICD-10 Preparation Takeaways for the Rest of 2015
  • Congress tackles Medicare spending with accountable care bill
  • Re-engineering patient safety through EHR, health IT
  • Wash. Health System Pilots IBM-Epic EHR Platform for DHMSM
  • Extended safe harbor to aid meaningful use, interoperability
  • KLAS taps 3M as top medical records coding product of 2012
  • Ransomware Leads to EHR Downtime at DC-Area Health System
  • ICD-10 implementation timeline for small and medium practices
  • Is your hybrid EHR-paper workflow putting patients at risk?
  • EHR Incentive Program tops $15.5B in meaningful use payments
  • The Week Ahead in Health IT Interoperability: Nov. 16-22
  • VT Health Information Exchange Makes Key External Connection
  • Big Data Prize to identify roadblocks, transform healthcare
  • CHIME Unveils National Patient Identifier Challenge Finalists
  • HL7, HSPC Partner to Initiate Interoperability FHIR Projects
  • Doctors Not Meeting Consumer Patient Engagement Expectations
  • Informatics Take Over at the Office of the National Coordinator
  • Safer EHR design should involve laboratory experts, says CDC
  • The Week Ahead in Health IT Interoperability: Dec. 14-20
  • The technical, cultural implications of the ICD-10 delay
  • ACOs display room for improvement with medication readiness
  • While PGHD can be largely beneficial to optimizing patient care, certain challenges may accompany the use and exchange of PGHD, the authors observe. Potential obstacles include the impact on clinical workflows, the management of patient expectations, the potential for increased liability, and the limited body of evidence for the clinical value of PGHD.

    Most clinical workflows do not presently support PGHD, so clinicians are primarily left to use data collected during a patient visit.

    One of the most significant advantages of PGHD is the ability to record data before and after patient visits to fill out an even fuller portrait of a patient’s medical history.

    However, this large cache of data could overwhelm providers and affect their workflows. Incorporating PGHD into clinical care necessitates upfront investments and sufficient technical infrastructure to avoid leading to inaccurate or duplicate records could appear in a patient’s medical history, among other potential issues. According to the authors, a lack of guidance and best practices on how to accept, review, and integrate this data has led clinicians thus to view PGHD with skepticism.

    To ameliorate these potential problems, the white paper has suggested a handful of enabling actions.

    First, the policy framework should support the use of prioritized PGHD use cases in clinician’s workflows. The framework should ideally help clinicians identify use cases and PGHD data types that are most relevant, useful, and valuable to improving patient care and then encourage providers to develop standard practices for the use of PGHD. Incorporating PGHD into their workflows and using tools to analyze the data will further foster confidence among providers regarding the benefits of well-utilized PGHD.

    According to the authors, the future framework should also encourage collaboration between clinicians and developers to advance technologies promoting efficient PGHD use. By recommending clinicians request technologies that optimize PGHD functionalities and allow efficient PGHD analysis, more developers of core clinical systems will prioritize and innovate these kinds of technologies.

    Likewise, the authors call for a framework that identifies benefits, challenges, and best practices of PGHD use to highlight its clinical value and business case.

    Lastly, the framework should promote the use of PGHD in supporting patient data donation for research purposes. The wealth of data made available by PGHD could be instrumental in a variety of studies, so clinicians should consider raising awareness about the potential benefits of donating data.

    With these considerations in mind, future policy is expected to optimize PGHD and ease present concerns about the practicality of this kind of information.

    “Technology — from consumer apps to medical-grade devices — has enabled patients to capture health data on their own,” said Jim Traficant, AFS Managing Director, Federal Health. “This draft white paper will help lay the groundwork for ONC to develop a policy framework for effectively and safely capturing, using and sharing PGHD to improve healthcare and research.”

    The draft white paper also addresses a wide breadth of additional topics including opportunities, challenges, and enabling actions for policymakers, technology stakeholders, payers, and employers. 

    Continue to site...