Electronic Health Records

Adoption & Implementation News

NC Medicaid payment system subject of class action lawsuit

By Kyle Murphy, PhD

- The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is again coming under fire for its handling of the state’s Medicaid program. This time it is the form of a class action lawsuit against the state agency for its implementation and operation of the Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS), NCTracks.

This is the same state agency that last week apologized for health data breach after it had sent the Medicaid cards of 48,752 beneficiaries to the wrong address. DHHS Secretary Aldona Wos revealed that the state agency was experiencing a number of problems as a result of implementing provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

The lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of Wake County alleges that DHHS and its MMIS partners — Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC, the system developer), Maximus Consulting Services (the organization responsible for system validation and verification), and SLI Global Solutions (the organization responsible for testing prior to launch) — are the cause of millions of dollars in damages to North Carolina Medicaid providers since the launch of NCTracks on July 1, 2013.

“In all, NCTracks had over 3,200 software errors in the first few months of operation, and payments to Medicaid providers were delayed, unpaid, or ‘shorted’ by over half a billion dollars in the first 90 days,” states the 48-page lawsuit via NC Policy Watch.

  • Maine’s HIE adds analytics, increases use by 150% in 2013
  • VA Continues Pursuit of EHR Interoperability with DoD
  • MGMA: Non-physician providers raise satisfaction, ease burdens
  • Is Adoption of Health IT Systems Possible in Rural Towns?
  • 3 EHR Vendors Release Million Hearts EHR Optimization Guides
  • Unhappy lawmakers take aim at VA, DoD plans to nix joint EHR
  • Study: mHealth app helps Chicago residents lose weight, keep it off
  • Survey: 62% of small providers say EHRs make practices run more smoothly
  • Survey: Patients should have access to PHI – but not all of it
  • HIE Use Cuts Costs, Increases Productivity in STI Treatment
  • ONC unveils dashboard for health IT data
  • Have EHRs, health IT adoption really made progress since 1990?
  • Lack of CEHRT to force changes in 2015 Medicare program
  • Why are meaningful use, EHR adoption waning in popularity?
  • How SMART is your health IT system?
  • Value-Based Care Fueling Provider Demands on Health IT Companies
  • Family Physicians to Benefit from Clinical Quality Data Tool
  • 96% of Paragon EHR Users Confident About Allscripts Acquisition
  • NYU WIRELESS to boost mHealth and mobile EHR
  • Usability Regulation Bypassed by Some ONC-Certified EHRs
  • Using mHealth to Promote a Healthier Public
  • On-call compensation varies widely among physicians
  • New HITPC workgroup to focus on patient safety, innovation
  • CVS Chooses Epic EHR System for Specialty Care Management
  • KPMG survey: Low readiness for Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • NCHS reports physician EHR adoption numbers
  • Why is true interoperability crucial to healthcare’s future?
  • ICD-10 countdown: Will we be ready for takeoff?
  • Stakeholders Seek Common Changes to Quality Payment Program
  • Allscripts CFO responds to criticism of company’s progress
  • HIMSS: Sustainability top of mind for RECs as funding dries up
  • Are hospitals capturing the necessary data for Stage 2 CQMs?
  • IOD Inc. connects with Social Security through MiHIN Gateway
  • Leapfrog: Only 26% of hospitals get an “A” in patient safety
  • Meaningful Use Hardship Exemptions Requests Approach 44,000
  • Number of primary care providers low but holding steady
  • Texas Bill Sets Health Information Exchange, Interoperability Goals
  • Seattle Children’s pilot targets pediatric care coordination
  • CDI produces financial, clinical benefits apart from ICD-10
  • With FTC approval, Cerner nears completion of Siemens deal
  • What determines the efficiency of risk-based models, ACOs?
  • Greenway is first ambulatory HIT vendor to join Healtheway
  • ACOs Facing Clinical Data Integration, Exchange Challenges
  • Did Meaningful Use Requirements Propel Hospital EHR Adoption?
  • EHR Implementation Weakens Productivity, Improves Revenue
  • Data migration can leave your information vulnerable
  • New Framework Examines EHR Usability Design and Testing
  • Health Information Exchange is a Tool, Not a Solution
  • CIOs to Benefit from CHIME’s KLAS, HIT Research Partnerships
  • ACOs doubled during past year, Medicare outpaced commercial
  • 3 Programs Supporting Health IT Standard FHIR Development
  • EHR Use, Health Data Exchange to Thrive Despite ACA Repeal
  • Health IT Certification Criteria Stresses Interoperability
  • What Payers Consider Ideal for Health Information Exchange
  • How is Interoperability Supporting Patient-Centered Care?
  • Industry Groups Respond to Patient-Centered EHR Legislation
  • 10 Provisions Up for Discussion in MIPS Regulation
  • EHR vendor selection checklist for hospitals
  • Tailored Physician EHR Use Necessary for Evolving Industry
  • EHRs, meaningful use improve patient safety, medical errors
  • What should providers be doing during the ICD-10 waiting game?
  • Greenway, eHealth Exchange Lead HIE Project in Oregon
  • 6.5 Billion Transactions Boost Health Information Exchange
  • Patients with PHR access more responsible, engaged, satisfied
  • AMA Continues to Urge Congress to Delay Meaningful Use
  • ICD-10 Best Practices: Coordinating with vendors and payers
  • ICD-10 elimination bill introduced in the Senate
  • Telehealth law to create federal definition, provide guidance
  • Role of Health Data Exchange in Advancing Care Information
  • EHR vendor consolidation: What does the future look like?
  • AMIA: “Unprecedented Opportunity” with MACRA Implementation
  • AMA: If ICD-10 is a must, don’t penalize us for doing it wrong
  • Surescripts joins Carequality health data exchange initiative
  • AMA Sees Trouble in Departures of DeSalvo, Reider from ONC
  • What do users want to change about their EHR systems?
  • athenahealth EHR Users Report Financial Gains 5% Over Baseline
  • Executive Council Healthcare Innovation Summit on 6/21
  • History, Challenges, and Considerations of ICD-10 Transition
  • Corrections issued for proposed Stage 2 rule
  • Guide: Meaningful Use Stage 2 clinical quality measures for EPs
  • Epic Systems, Cerner Among 8 Health IT Companies Recognized by EHRA
  • KeyHIE Innovates for Interoperability, Population Health Management
  • What actionable data means in an ICD-10, accountable world
  • Health IT Systems Improve Patient Safety, Workflow in Radiology
  • What to Make of Epic’s Interoperability Work with Surescripts
  • Is the Timeline for MACRA Implementation Too Aggressive?
  • The Week Ahead in Health IT Interoperability: Nov. 2-8
  • Is $2.35 per Patient a Fair Price for EHR Interoperability?
  • What do most accountable care organizations have in common?
  • CHIME Calls for Adjustments to Meaningful Use Requirements
  • ICSA Labs authorized to certify Stage 2 EHRs
  • AMIA studies show popularity of iPads to access EHR in hospitals
  • EHRA Requests ONC Health Data Exchange Framework Be Voluntary
  • Aetna, Atlantic Accountable Care Organization pen agreement
  • Is your hybrid EHR-paper workflow putting patients at risk?
  • AHRQ looks to measure the quality of EHR and health IT
  • Groups Urge Congress to Cover Telemedicine under Medicare
  • Top EHR Twitter resources
  • Worrisome lack of coding accuracy in ICD-10 National Pilot
  • Physicians voice EHR displeasure in athenahealth survey
  • DHHS has had a shaky history with implementing an MMIS. According to the allegations in the lawsuit, the state agency’s first attempt ended in a failure in 2006, with the state footing $30 million for a new system that never panned out. The following year, a new request for proposal (RFP) was issued in July and then withdrawn, revised, and reissued in December. A $287-million contract was eventually rewarded to CSC which indicated a completion deadline of Aug. 22, 2011. The deadline was missed by nearly two years and the budget almost doubled as well as $207 was added to the budget.

    If the allegations hold up, DHHS should have known better than to have chosen CSC. All it had to do was review the company’s history in New York where the company failed its contract for the New York MMIS. That two-year, $357-million project was hampered by delays which ultimately led to the project finishing up close to 3 years behind and $166.4 million over budget. As recently as 2010, the New York Comptroller set in motion the abandoning the CSC-developed MMIS and the pursuit of a replacement.

    According to the lawsuit, CSC intended to reuse 90 percent of the Common Business-Oriented Language (COBOL) code from the New York MMIS to create NCTracks. Ultimately, the MMIS developer decided to reuse only 32 percent of the code and opted to write new code, leading to delays and opening the system up to new flaws.

    “As with any implementation of an IT system of this size and complexity, the transition has not been without challenges,” DHHS CIO Joseph Cooper, Jr., told the Charlotte Observer. “To date, the new system has processed more than 104 million claims and paid more than $5.5 billion to North Carolina healthcare providers, out-performing the 35-year old system it replaced. DHHS continues to address provider issues as they arise.”

    CSC has deemed the lawsuit without merit, but findings from the state’s own auditing of the system appears to show otherwise when it revealed that 600 of the known 3,200 defects in existence since July 1 had not be remediated by November 5.

    The lawsuit has received backing from the likes of the North Carolina Medical Society.

    Read the full lawsuit here.

    Continue to site...