Electronic Health Records

Adoption & Implementation News

NC Medicaid payment system subject of class action lawsuit

By Kyle Murphy, PhD

- The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is again coming under fire for its handling of the state’s Medicaid program. This time it is the form of a class action lawsuit against the state agency for its implementation and operation of the Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS), NCTracks.

This is the same state agency that last week apologized for health data breach after it had sent the Medicaid cards of 48,752 beneficiaries to the wrong address. DHHS Secretary Aldona Wos revealed that the state agency was experiencing a number of problems as a result of implementing provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

The lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of Wake County alleges that DHHS and its MMIS partners — Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC, the system developer), Maximus Consulting Services (the organization responsible for system validation and verification), and SLI Global Solutions (the organization responsible for testing prior to launch) — are the cause of millions of dollars in damages to North Carolina Medicaid providers since the launch of NCTracks on July 1, 2013.

“In all, NCTracks had over 3,200 software errors in the first few months of operation, and payments to Medicaid providers were delayed, unpaid, or ‘shorted’ by over half a billion dollars in the first 90 days,” states the 48-page lawsuit via NC Policy Watch.

  • Launching Epic, HIE at Catholic Health Partners: CIO Series
  • Public Health Expert Joins Texas Health Information Exchange
  • Value of structured data to interoperability, meaningful use
  • Will HIEs Play a Role in the Future of Interoperability?
  • Brooklyn HIE supports mental health patients, coordinates care
  • VA to DoD: Adopt VistA for sake of seamless EHR integration
  • Key advances in health information exchange emerge across US
  • Mercy SaaS Service Drives Accelerated Epic EHR Implementation
  • Cerner’s Siemens deal aims at interoperability, pop health
  • What ramifications will HIMSS14 have for health IT?
  • CMS, ONC Fall Short of Addressing Fraudulent EHR Use
  • CliniComp Files Federal Lawsuit for VA Cerner EHR Contract
  • Will payment adjustments boost meaningful use participation?
  • Will EHR Incentives Help Spread Health Information Exchange?
  • ONC proposes 2015 edition EHR certification criteria
  • Massachusetts launches ICD-10 training collaborative
  • Meaningful use workflow tips for eligible providers
  • How Stage 2 will impact electronic health records
  • Are hospitals ready for the demands of value-based care?
  • Top Physician EHR Issues Disrupting Clinical Workflows
  • New Measures Under Stage 3 Meaningful Use Requirements
  • AHA wants reforms for quality measures, clinical integration
  • WEDI: Eight ICD-10 tasks for providers to complete now
  • Consumers Ramp Up Access of Electronic Health Records
  • Data Governance Failures Exposed in VHA Eligibility System
  • Telehealth roundup: Insurers expand telemedicine coverage
  • Three Recent Major Health Information Exchange Developments
  • Health IT Systems Partly Responsible for Medication Errors
  • EHR, population health, and the clinic community
  • Recent Agreements to Extend Cerner EHR, RCM Technology
  • 89% Success in ICD-10 Acknowledgement Testing, CMS Says
  • Lack of EHR Interoperability Holding Back Enterprise Imaging
  • Adventist Health Network and Cigna create ACO in Illinois
  • Seattle Children’s pilot targets pediatric care coordination
  • Personal Connected Health Alliance to bring mHealth worldwide
  • Physician perspectives: Is ICD-10 no big deal?
  • Epic-IBM DoD EHR Modernization Award Bid Making Progress
  • AHIMA: Half of providers plan to go ahead with ICD-10 anyway
  • How Large-Scale EHR Adoption Is Transforming the Pharmacy
  • Why should business intelligence accompany EHR adoption?
  • ICD-10 might be even tougher for non-HIPAA entities
  • Real-time EHR data analytics helps reduce readmissions by 5%
  • What digital access is needed for true patient engagement?
  • CHIME Announces Patient Identification Challenge
  • How to avoid choosing the wrong healthcare analytics tool
  • Voice recognition a “game changer” for EHR use: Q&A
  • AHA: Health IT a Driver in Quality Care Improvement
  • Will patient engagement work without patient incentives?
  • Are non-physician-led PCMHs a bad thing for healthcare?
  • New Stoltenberg program aims at rural providers
  • Draft Bill Proposes New Plan for EHR Interoperability
  • Midnight deadline looms for Medicare meaningful use EPs
  • Lack of Interoperability Dominates VA Health IT Challenges
  • Independent docs not optimistic about accountable care, EHRs
  • Arizona Health Information Exchange Rebrands to Continue Growth
  • How is uneven HIE adoption affecting population health?
  • Is the Industry Ready for the ICD-10 Implementation Deadline?
  • How much closer to true interoperability is CommonWell?
  • Conn. Weighs Health Data Exchange, Interoperability Bill
  • ONC reveals winning apps for Blue Button Plus Challenge
  • New SGR repeal estimates place costs at $121 billion
  • Army Upgrades EHR System; VA Hopes to Add More Telehealth
  • EHR vendor selection checklist for hospitals
  • ICSA Labs receives ANSI accreditation
  • How do patient engagement, retention impact meaningful use?
  • MU for mHealth? Why telemedicine should get better faster
  • Epic EHR still costing Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
  • Is a Culture Change Critical for Health IT Interoperability?
  • Healthcare Claims Data for Sale Under New CMS Regulation
  • Who’s responsible for resolving EHR-HIE interoperability?
  • Are Meaningful Use Requirements Enough for Patient Engagement?
  • EHRA Questions Scope of ONC Interoperability Roadmap
  • Telemedicine will be the norm as care shifts towards patients
  • Healthcare Organizations Call for Value-based Care Policy
  • Montana telehealth parity law goes into effect
  • What does the eHealth Exchange mean to nationwide HIE?
  • EHR systems and patient stories in healthcare
  • VA makes progress on oldest benefits claims in massive queue
  • Carequality, AMA Singly Advance Health IT Interoperability
  • Moving Toward a Universe of Health IT Interoperability
  • Unpredictable Physician Workflows Warrant Revised EHR Design
  • Five ways a cloud-based EHR can make meaningful use easy
  • Effective Patient Engagement Strategies Using Health IT
  • Californian Children’s Hospitals Receive HIMSS Stage 7 Award
  • mHealth, Data Analytics See $4.7 Billion in 2014 VC Funding
  • State medical boards adopt updated telemedicine guidelines
  • Physician burnout: The not-so-hidden casualty of EHRs
  • Minnesota mandates certified EHRs for all dentists by 2015
  • Survey results show healthcare worker confidence on the rise
  • Cerner Partners with HealthSouth for Improved Care Coordination
  • How Stage 2 Meaningful Use drives patient engagement
  • EHR patient access debate still up in the air
  • Growth of Surescripts network boosts interoperability, HIE
  • Solo physicians and accountable care: Is it time to sell out?
  • Study: mHealth app helps Chicago residents lose weight, keep it off
  • ONC releases new Health IT SAFER guides
  • Study shows patient consent, concerns crucial to HIEs
  • EHR Downtime Results from Ransomware Attacks at CA, IN Hospitals
  • US Coast Guard Searching for Commercial EHR to Replace Epic
  • AHIMA 2013 will be about ICD-10 preparation for 2014
  • DHHS has had a shaky history with implementing an MMIS. According to the allegations in the lawsuit, the state agency’s first attempt ended in a failure in 2006, with the state footing $30 million for a new system that never panned out. The following year, a new request for proposal (RFP) was issued in July and then withdrawn, revised, and reissued in December. A $287-million contract was eventually rewarded to CSC which indicated a completion deadline of Aug. 22, 2011. The deadline was missed by nearly two years and the budget almost doubled as well as $207 was added to the budget.

    If the allegations hold up, DHHS should have known better than to have chosen CSC. All it had to do was review the company’s history in New York where the company failed its contract for the New York MMIS. That two-year, $357-million project was hampered by delays which ultimately led to the project finishing up close to 3 years behind and $166.4 million over budget. As recently as 2010, the New York Comptroller set in motion the abandoning the CSC-developed MMIS and the pursuit of a replacement.

    According to the lawsuit, CSC intended to reuse 90 percent of the Common Business-Oriented Language (COBOL) code from the New York MMIS to create NCTracks. Ultimately, the MMIS developer decided to reuse only 32 percent of the code and opted to write new code, leading to delays and opening the system up to new flaws.

    “As with any implementation of an IT system of this size and complexity, the transition has not been without challenges,” DHHS CIO Joseph Cooper, Jr., told the Charlotte Observer. “To date, the new system has processed more than 104 million claims and paid more than $5.5 billion to North Carolina healthcare providers, out-performing the 35-year old system it replaced. DHHS continues to address provider issues as they arise.”

    CSC has deemed the lawsuit without merit, but findings from the state’s own auditing of the system appears to show otherwise when it revealed that 600 of the known 3,200 defects in existence since July 1 had not be remediated by November 5.

    The lawsuit has received backing from the likes of the North Carolina Medical Society.

    Read the full lawsuit here.

    Continue to site...