Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

President Obama Signs 21st Century Cures Act into Law

The 21st Century Cures Act will streamline drug approval processes at the FDA, provide medical research funding, and target better EHR and health IT use.

By Sara Heath

- Earlier this week, President Barack Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act into law.

21st-century-cures-act-ehr

Among its main provisions to relax drug approval procedures at the Food and Drug Administration and provide funding for various projects such as the Precision Medicine Initiative and Cancer Moonshot, the law targets better EHR use and supports health data interoperability.

In a public statement, Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), chairperson of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee and co-sponsor to the bill, reiterated his delight at its passage.

“The real winners today are American families whose lives stand to be improved by the legislation signed into law. For the second consecutive year, President Obama has signed another Christmas miracle,” he said.

  • CHIME: CMS Must Align Meaningful Use, MIPS Measures in 2017
  • Is the Industry Ready for the ICD-10 Implementation Deadline?
  • How EHRs can promote safety of medical devices using UDIs
  • ONC Expands Health IT Interoperability Standards Advisory
  • Physician EHR Access Increased with Surescripts’ Tool
  • Do Patient Engagement Measures Address Privacy Concerns?
  • Beyond Electronic Health Records: HIT Infrastructure of APMs
  • Physician series: Thorough training made EHR adoption easy
  • BCBS of Michigan continues push for patient-centered care
  • Congress asks for details on ICD-10 delay, CMS plan for 2015
  • Top Physician EHR Issues Disrupting Clinical Workflows
  • Meaningful Use Fails to Advance Pediatric EHR Adoption
  • Vanderbilt Readies for $200M System-Wide Epic Implementation
  • Physician EHR Changes Improve Test Ordering, Patient Safety
  • North Carolina Group Achieves EHR Integration for Referrals
  • Physician Employment Landscape Set to Change in 2015
  • What do specialist EHR users need from their EHR templates?
  • ONC opts against proposed voluntary 2015 EHR certification
  • SHIEC Health IT Partner Program Grew Significantly in 2017
  • CMS Reminds Hospital of Deadline for EHR Incentive Payments
  • CHIME weighs in on proposed meaningful use changes in 2014
  • Study shows health IT’s positive, negative effects on safety
  • Mobile Device Integration Presents Stethoscope Alternative
  • Five ICD-10 tasks to complete by the end of 2013
  • Which providers have most benefited from EHR incentives for Medicare?
  • AHA Seeks 4 Changes to MIPS as Part of MACRA Implementation
  • House to Form VA Cerner EHR Implementation Oversight Panel
  • Virtualization, speech recognition to grow aggressively
  • Google Glass is making a convincing case for healthcare
  • SHIN-NY HIE Successfully Implements Patient Record Lookup
  • Will CQMs hamper providers in Stage 2 Meaningful Use?
  • Does EHR Coverage Data Affect Continued Patient Care?
  • Practice Fusion makes first acquisition, acquires 100Plus
  • EHRs and big data analytics aid personalized patient care
  • ACO Plus Partners with Sandlot for HIE boost
  • Reducing Health IT Interoperability Friction with FHIR
  • GAO Urges DoD, VA to Establish EHR Interoperability Goals
  • Why ICD-10 Is More about Quality Data, Less about Payment
  • Overcoming barriers to decision support, CPOE at ThedaCare
  • COREC preaches standardization for EHR implementation
  • Pennsylvania Medicaid earning its stripes
  • EHR, Management Systems Facilitated Transition to ICD-10
  • Geisinger Health System CEO, President to step down in 2015
  • PA Support for Health Data Exchange, Meaningful Use Continues
  • “The cyborg will see you now”: Will robot doctors assimilate into healthcare?
  • Why Healthcare Providers Should Embrace Innovative EHR Use
  • Potential health data breach at Boston Children’s Hospital
  • EHRs cause physicians to lose 48 minutes per day, survey says
  • New tool identified for assessing quality of clinical notes
  • Mass. HIE growth includes better care coordination
  • Arkansas Legislature Considers Health IT Legislation
  • Is the Triple Aim of Healthcare Achievable Through EHRs?
  • Baton Rouge Clinic, Cigna launch ACO
  • NC HIE latest to add direct messaging
  • EHR Vendors Lag Behind in EHR Interoperability, Usability
  • Tiger Team seeks patient privacy and security input
  • Physician series: EHRs a “challenge” for large cancer practice
  • Medical Groups Urge NY to Reconsider e-Prescribing Mandate
  • Achieving return on investment after EHR replacement
  • How can rural healthcare providers afford EHR?
  • SNOMED and LOINC team up ahead of ICD-10
  • Wake Forest’s Epic woes continue with slashed worker raises
  • Potential VA Secretary Nom May Finish Cerner EHR Contract Talks
  • CMS Outlines 2015 PQRS Reporting Challenges, Trends
  • The business case for big data and healthcare analytics
  • Revised 21st Century Cures Act Targets Effective EHR Use
  • Healthcare IT market to see continued growth through 2018
  • DirectTrust President and CEO David Kibbe, MD, to Step Down
  • ONC Sets Up ‘Proving Ground’ for Health IT Interoperability
  • Cerner settles financial software dispute for $106.2 million
  • Study shows need to establish standard practices for CDS
  • Congress tackles Medicare spending with accountable care bill
  • AHIMA, ONC Release Online Health IT Tools
  • PCORI launches new $15.5-million patient-centered initiative
  • Few Physicians Think EHR Technology Improves Outcomes
  • Cerner EHR Partly Blamed for Hospital Billing Issues, Bankruptcy
  • Informatics Take Over at the Office of the National Coordinator
  • Meditech adoption leads to financial losses at two hospitals
  • Why is Stage 2 Meaningful Use a challenge for providers?
  • Analyzing a doctor’s dissenting opinion on EHR value
  • EHRA Requests ONC Health Data Exchange Framework Be Voluntary
  • Meaningful Use Tracker may fit small providers
  • Ambulatory providers need better ambulatory EHR systems
  • MEDITECH to Deploy CommonWell Interoperability Services in 2018
  • Finding the value in HIE, IT integration will push adoption: Q&A
  • How an Alaska HIE is Improving its Patient EHR Matching Strategy
  • Is Experian now the frontrunner in revenue cycle management?
  • Outdated IT delays ACOs, pay-for-performance models for payors
  • Epic health IT specialists in high demand, low availability
  • Getting to the crux of meaningful use
  • UC San Francisco creates Center for Digital Health Innovation
  • May 29: CMS to host call on Stage 2 Meaningful Use for EPs
  • Telemedicine gets increasingly popular with insurance plans
  • How to overcome obstacles in the way of patient engagement
  • 35% of EHR users will increase investment in patient portals
  • 4 Key Areas to Watch in Healthcare Interoperability
  • ONC weighing accounting of disclosures in Monday’s hearing
  • Why is post-implementation investment in Epic EHRs integral?
  • AMA adopts new telemedicine reimbursement policy
  • AMIA Notes Health IT Safety Considerations to FDA in EHR Use
  • “This bipartisan law will help us take advantage of the breathtaking advances in biomedical research and bring those innovations to doctors’ offices and patients’ medicine cabinets.”

    Specifically, the law calls for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to “establish a goal with respect to the reduction of regulatory or administrative burdens (such as documentation requirements) relating to the use of electronic health records,” and subsequently create a strategy to achieve such a goal.

    Those strategies should include incentive programs to spur increased EHR and health IT adoption. These include meaningful use, requirements under the Quality Payment Program, and the Hospital Value-based Purchasing Program.

    Additionally, the law calls on ONC to establish better requirements for health IT interoperability. Through strong health IT certification rules, the agency is expected to facilitate better data transfer between disparate systems.

    ONC is also required to establish clear language surrounding information blocking.

    Certification rules must ensure a health IT developer “provides assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that such developer or entity, unless for legitimate purposes specified by the Secretary, will not take any action described in clause (i) or any other action that may inhibit the appropriate exchange, access, and use of electronic health information,” the law says.

    The rules should include ramifications for health IT developers who do engage in intentional information blocking.

    The bill also states that no later than six months after it has been passed, the HHS Secretary must submit to ONC meaningful use attestation statistics. The Secretary must also make meaningful use hardship exemptions reasonably available to both eligible professionals and eligible hospitals.

    In addition to support health IT, the 21st Century Cures Act calls for new drug development and clinical trial protocol, reportedly streamlining the process to help get potentially life-saving drugs on the market. According to FDA’s Commissioner, Robert M. Califf, MD, this fast-tracking of cures will extend to health devices, as well.

    “For devices, this past year was the first full year of operation for FDA’s expedited access pathway (EAP) program, which helps speed the development and availability of certain medical devices that demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for life-threatening or irreversibly-debilitating diseases or conditions,” Califf said in a public statement.

    Additionally, the law allocates greater funding for biomedical research. The law provides $4.8 billion to the National Institutes of Health to be split among four different projects: $1.8 billion will go to the Cancer Moonshot, $1.4 billion will fund the Precision Medicine Initiative, and $1.6 billion will fund the BRAIN Initiative which supports Alzheimer’s disease research.

    The 21st Century Cures Act began making its way through Congress in the summer of 2015. At the end of November 2016, a group of senators, including Alexander, reintroduced a revised version of the bill reportedly with the hopes to pass it during its lame duck session.

    At the start of December, the House passed the bill in a 392 to 26 vote, sending it to the Senate for approval. After a vote of cloture, which pushed the bill to a decisive vote, the Senate voted in favor 85-13.

    Dig Deeper:

    X

    EHRIntelligence

    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...