Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

Return of Annual Updates to ICD-10 Code Set Begin Oct. 1

With the lifting of the ICD-10 code set freeze, regularly scheduled annual updates are coming.

By Kyle Murphy, PhD

- At a recent meeting of the ICD-10 Coordination & Maintenance Committee, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services unveiled plans for implementing the first updates to the ICD-10 code set.

CMS, CDC discuss first updates to ICD-10 code set

Last week's meeting was the first since the ICD-10 implementation deadline on October 1, which ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee Co-Chair labeled a success.

"We're so pleased to report that no sky fell and there were no major issues. We had no big billing problems. And life is good," she said to kick off the two-day public forum in Baltimore to discuss proposed code changes to ICD-10 codes.

On the subject of ICD-10 updates, the first additions to ICD-10 codes will come on Oct. 1, 2016 as no requests for updates were made at a previous meeting of the committee back in October 2015.

  • ONC Sets Up ‘Proving Ground’ for Health IT Interoperability
  • 35% of EHR users will increase investment in patient portals
  • Accountable Care, EHR Interoperability Vital for DOD Healthcare
  • Selecting an EHR replacement: Necessary or necessary evil?
  • Allscripts Will Sell Stake in Netsmart, Ending 2-Year Partnership
  • HIMSS: Less than 6% of ambulatory practices use patient portals, PHRs
  • How to Map Epic EHR Lab Orders to Reference Laboratories
  • Furloughed VA closes benefits offices, stops health IT work
  • UCHealth Hospital Switching MEDITECH EHR for Epic EHR Replacement
  • Workarounds Needed to Close EHR Integration Gaps
  • Healthcare IT in an age of reform
  • DoD Makes Important Health Information Exchange Move in WA
  • Why integration led to an Epic implementation at Baptist
  • Nachimson Advisors Refutes ICD-10 Implementation Costs Claims
  • Registration open for ONC Summit 2012
  • Meaningful use audits: What you need to know
  • US, UK to collaborate on health IT to improve patient care
  • Why are payers concerned with patient engagement strategies?
  • EHR Patient Data Utilized in Mercy, Johnson & Johnson Collaboration
  • What new health IT will hospitals buy after implementing EHRs?
  • WEDI Appoints Former AHIP Exec as Interim CEO
  • Handwritten orders bypass EHR alerts at VA, cause three deaths
  • VA Shares Vision for EHR Interoperability, Modernization
  • What healthcare technology helped contain MERS in Indiana?
  • Cloud-based EHR considerations for small providers
  • CORHIO adds Children’s Hospital Colorado to HIE
  • PwC enters competition for DoD EHR modernization contract
  • Turning minimum data sets, CCDs into meaningful HIE
  • The Congressional Case for Rebooting Meaningful Use Program
  • ONC issues RFC for Stage 3 Meaningful Use
  • Physical therapy straw owner sentenced in Medicare fraud case
  • Accountable Care Improves Patient Safety by 17% Since 2010
  • Achieving meaningful use using outside resources: CIO series
  • Are HIE, Patient Access Meaningful Use Requirements Unfair?
  • Epic Leads EHR Implementations, Cerner EHR Selections in 2016
  • Surescripts NRLS Use Live at 4 More Major Health Systems
  • AMIA Calls for Lab Data Interoperability Standards Improvements
  • Epic EHR Best Supports Success in Meaningful Use Performance
  • Internal readiness, training are vital for ICD-10 success: Q&A
  • Making EHR personal for providers and patients
  • What characteristics make up effective patient engagement?
  • Hospital Roundup: Recent Health Technology Investments
  • Army Upgrades EHR System; VA Hopes to Add More Telehealth
  • Drug Safety Surveillance Targeted through EHR Data Analytics
  • Patients to Step Up Health Data Exchange Involvement in 2016
  • Practice Fusion makes first acquisition, acquires 100Plus
  • Survey: Patients should have access to PHI – but not all of it
  • ONC Considers Meaningful Use Requirements, Patient Engagement
  • Waverly Health Center Switches to eClinicalWorks EHR from Paragon
  • CHIME CIOs still concerned about staff shortages
  • Eligible Hospitals Progress in Meaningful Use Public Health
  • Why project management is essential to health IT adoption
  • Turning Health IT Standards into Useable Technology, Data
  • CMS Offers Training, Testing Tips for ICD-10 Implementation
  • Mostashari at HIMSS13: Healthcare is broken, but we can fix it
  • Dealing with health IT and EHR challenges
  • Michigan Health Connect adds large provider network to HIE
  • ICD-10, ACA survey shows concerns for impact on daily tasks
  • What makes a health IT go-live command center effective?
  • Health IT Standards, Information Governance Needed in Medicine
  • VA: Telehealth Reached More Than 690,000 Vets during FY 2014
  • Readers, providers express disapproval of ICD-10 delay
  • What is different about health IT when talking usability?
  • Can small providers knock out ICD-10 “in a few weekends?”
  • How is Interoperability Supporting Patient-Centered Care?
  • Former GE Exec Jeff Immelt Appointed New athenahealth Chairman
  • How can rural healthcare providers afford EHR?
  • AHA Highlights Need for Improved Data Provision to MSSP ACOs
  • Meaningful Use Fails to Advance Pediatric EHR Adoption
  • Cerner Seeks EHR Contracts with More Government Agencies
  • Epic EHR adoption, quality efforts raise revenues in Michigan
  • EHR replacement: Top motivations for switching EHR systems
  • ICD-10 Success for Large Practices, Problematic for Small
  • DE Health Information Exchange Improves EHR Patient Access
  • Study Reveals Prevalence of Copy-Paste in EHR Clinical Data
  • Florida doctors weigh higher costs for medical record copies
  • Four ways IT can facilitate ACO success
  • Task-Switching Hazard Revealed in EHR Integration Study
  • More Responses to Meaningful Use Penalties, Participation
  • EHR Replacement Q&A: Lack of support, training made us switch
  • Understanding Large-Scale Health System EHR Implementations
  • Georgia Tech Furthers VA Vision for EHR Interoperability
  • Tracking MACRA’s Progress toward Industrywide Implementation
  • ePHI will benefit from more policy not just more technology
  • New ways of measuring quality are needed now
  • Legal Impetus for Strengthening Heath Information Governance
  • Indiana, Michigan increase scope of interstate HIE
  • WEDI: Healthcare delivery, payment reforms top list of concerns
  • CMQs gain prominence in Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • Cancer Practice to Pay $26M for False Meaningful Use Attestations
  • E-Prescribing to Benefit from Electronic Transactions Changes
  • CORHIO to connect South Metro Primary Care to HIE
  • VA integrates mHealth into daily care, gives iPads to vets
  • Former Allscripts CEO moves into mHealth with new startup
  • AHA to President-elect Trump: Cancel Stage 3 Meaningful Use
  • More Patients Accessing Electronic Medical Records, Says ONC
  • CHIME, AMA Support Bill to Revise EHR Incentive Programs
  • More on the South Shore Hospital health data breach
  • How Sutter Health Pushes Health Data Exchange Forward
  • Meaningful Use Workgroup tackles EHR clinical documentation
  • "If we had planned to have an April 1 code update, then we would have had to have a request at the September Coordination & Maintenance Committee meeting for an expedited code update," she explained. "If we had, we would have made that decision by now. There were no requests for an April 1 code update at the September meeting; therefore, there won't be any updates until October 1, 2016."

    As Brooks went on to explain, the "longer than expected" code freeze that went into effect as a result of repeated ICD-10 delays has thawed. Regular, annual updates to ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were paused after Oct. 1, 2011, and only limited code updates occurred in subsequent years on the same date.

    Despite the code freeze, ICD-10 Coordination & Maintenance Committee continued to meet twice annually to gauge the public's interest in requesting new diagnosis or procedure codes. Evaluations of those requests were similarly delayed until the partial freeze ended.

    The proposed rule specifying the first updates to ICD-10 codes is slated to be published next month. The final rule will be published in August and code updates implemented on October 1. The public has until April to submit comments on the proposed code updates covered in this week's meeting. Additionally, a complete code update and addendum will appear in June.

    On the ICD-10-PCS side, a total of 3651 new and 487 revised codes are currently under review, pushing the total number of ICD-10-PCS codes to 75,625 in fiscal year 2017.

    Of the new codes, 97 percent pertain to cardiovascular system codes — 3549 new codes. The lion's share of the proposal for new codes came as a result of a new for unique device values for multiple intraluminal devices and related means for documenting arterial conditions.

    While the diagnosis codes are few in number, they also include numerous deletions, according to Donna Pickett, MPH, RHIA, of the Centers for Disease Control.

    "For the diagnosis side, we're looking at about 1900 new codes, and that would also include 313 deletions and 351 revised codes," she said during the second day of the public forum.

    Pickett noted that the much longer code set freeze saw 162 proposals made. "Yes, quite a bit," she added.

    "Interestingly, if you're wondering why things are progressing as they are," she continued, "there were a number of proposals that were presented early on in the cycle, for instance 2012, and in subsequent years during the freeze additional proposals came in and either revised what was already presented, others were withdrawn, others were amended, and then there were some that were very complex that required multiple re-presentations. Most of you who follow the process know which ones those are."

    Unsurprisingly, the four-year freeze means a lot of work to work through the backlog while at the same time considering new proposals.



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 1000,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...