Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

Staff Training Crucial in ICD-10 Conversion Preparations

By Vera Gruessner

- Healthcare providers who are behind in their ICD-10 conversion preparations may benefit from following the ICD-10 Quick Start Guide provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

ICD-10 Conversion Preparations

The five steps that providers will need to take when it comes to their ICD-10 conversion preparations are the following: (1) developing a plan, (2) training the healthcare staff, (3) updating system processes, (4) working with vendors and health insurers, and (5) testing workflow processes and systems.

When it comes to training the clinical staff (including nurses, doctors, and medical assistants) and moving forward with ICD-10 conversion preparations, it’s vital to focus on new clinical concepts and documentation obtained through ICD-10 codes. When training coding and administrative staff including coders, billers, and practice management employees, the focus should be on ICD-10 fundamentals.

CMS provides a variety of resources including webinars, national provider calls and presentations, the Road to 10 website, and email updates. Physician groups, healthcare organizations, hospitals, payers, and vendors also offer a variety of resources for medical providers who are still behind with some common ICD-10 conversion preparations.

  • MACRA Raises Need for EHR Optimization, Other Improvements
  • CIO series: Ardent Health’s Mark Gilliam
  • eClinicalWorks EHR Certification Subject of Recent Legal Action
  • Key advances in health information exchange emerge across US
  • Aetna, Cigna, Humana reveal new accountable care strategies
  • Guest post: Finding trained & educated HIT personnel in MU era
  • Telehealth Visits Are 83% Effective, Less Than Half as Costly
  • S4S Pilot to Enable Patient Access to Health Information
  • Analytics, Smart Workflow Combine for Safety and Savings
  • Geneia Survey: Physician Job Satisfaction on the Decline
  • Is Meaningful Use meaningless for care quality?
  • Physician series: EHR vendor went bankrupt right after paying
  • Canadian Physician Suspended for Deceptively Altering Patient EHR
  • Tenn. allowed speedy EHR access during meningitis emergency
  • Three Recent Major Health Information Exchange Developments
  • Is Allscripts experiencing a real change of fortune?
  • Can EHRs lower malpractice rates, diagnosis errors?
  • EHR tool improves care transitions for pediatric patients
  • July 15: WEDI, CMS begin meaningful use webinar series
  • How EHR Use Drives Clinical Quality Reporting, Accountability
  • What must providers do when their cloud-based EHR goes down?
  • Can Health IT Tools Reduce Patient Readmission Rates?
  • EHR best practices: Considering a new EHR vendor, system
  • Updated Clinical Quality Measures Revealed by CMS
  • Step Counts More Reliable Than Other Activity Measures
  • Has HIE become “an unmitigated disaster”?
  • State Strongholds for EHR Vendors Among MU Hospitals
  • Florida HIE Increases Reach of Event Notification Service
  • Vendor dispute leaves rural practice without EHR data access
  • Community Health Center Week: Current EHR trends
  • ICD-10 may have to coexist with ICD-9 for successful switch
  • Are too many providers playing the ACO waiting game?
  • Medsphere EHR Moves to Amazon to Cut EHR Implementation Costs
  • QR codes on vaccines help collect EHR data, reduce errors
  • Why is true interoperability crucial to healthcare’s future?
  • CMS Offers Stage 3 Meaningful Use Flexibilities in Final Rule
  • HIMSS Announces New Value Score for EHR, Health IT Users
  • Meaningful use: Stage 1, Stage 2 comparison
  • Debating Role of Patient Portal in Health Data Integration
  • Study reveals NLP capability to detect patterns in patient data
  • MACRA’s Quality Payment Program to Support Health IT Progress
  • EHR vendor consolidation: What does the future look like?
  • EHR Incentive Program payments total $12.6 billion in February
  • Is EHR Interoperability Being Blocked by Health Systems?
  • DoD Health Systems Connected to OK Health Information Exchange
  • Start ICD-10 success with the data you already have now
  • Health IT Comparison Tool Framework Taking Shape
  • ICD-10 preparation: Where should your practice be right now?
  • ICD-10 updates: Providers must use new 1500 form by April 1
  • ONC: Meaningful use incentives will continue despite shutdown
  • Patient engagement isn’t always easy, but it’s worth it: Q&A
  • How EHRs can stop information overload, streamline workflow
  • CMS Clarifies Meaningful Use Requirements for Public Health
  • Engagement critical to Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • Rural Hospitals Remain Weak Spot in EHR Interoperability
  • Congress wants meaningful use to address health disparities
  • Indiana Health Information Exchange Ties to St. Vincent EHR
  • How patient consent will impact HIE success
  • Congress agrees on framework to replace Medicare SGR
  • AMIA Supports Less Aggressive CMS 2015 CEHRT Timeline
  • Survey: Time, resources, buy-in prevent true meaningful use
  • Authors criticize EHR innovation
  • Physician Feedback Key to EHR Usability Improvements
  • What Are the Top Hospital Ambulatory EHR Systems?
  • Tavenner receives bipartisan praise during Senate hearing
  • AHRQ grants show use cases for clinical decision support
  • Why do Medicaid providers struggle with meaningful use?
  • Why project management is essential to health IT adoption
  • Top Challenges to Leveraging Patient-Generated Health Data
  • UPDATE: Pending Modifications Holding Back EHR Incentive Programs
  • How to Adopt Unique Device Identifiers for Medical Devices
  • Most Physicians Doubt Preparedness for MACRA Requirements
  • NIST Warns of Copy and Paste Threats to EHR Data Integrity
  • ‘Patients First’ Brings Stage 7 Ambulatory Award
  • Accountable Care Organization EHR, HIE Use by the Numbers
  • What physicians make of incentives for care reform
  • OIG releases top 10 management challenges of 2012
  • Lack of oversight in 2010 led to $6.7B in Medicare payments
  • Health Information Exchanges Report Information Blocking
  • HITECH Directly Responsible for Hospital EHR Adoption Spike
  • Texas Health Information Exchange Receives EHNAC Accreditation
  • Where is the accountability for patients in meaningful use?
  • EHR Replacement Trend Expands to Emergency Departments
  • Medicare ACOs raise quality and share $445 million in savings
  • Stage 2 Meaningful Use clinical quality measures for eligible hospitals
  • What do most accountable care organizations have in common?
  • Laws increase telemedicine coverage in Kentucky, Missouri
  • Software Advice lists top 10 EHR vendors for meaningful use
  • Unsuccessful eRx participants face payment changes
  • Senators Request Timeline for VA Cerner EHR Implementation
  • Select EHR providers meet for ONC panel talk
  • What makes meaningful use challenging for small practices?
  • Should Patient-Reported Outcomes Be Incorporated in EHRs?
  • EHR adoption hits 96% in MA; half of patients engage online
  • Healthcare Pros Focus on Patient-Centered Interoperability
  • Partners Epic Implementation Causing Headaches for Some
  • ONC head: Demise of fee-for-service, rise of ACOs inevitable
  • What role can health information exchanges play in big data?
  • Health IT Leader at Center of $800K Fraud Scandal in California
  • EMR use leads to higher loyalty, satisfaction among patients
  • The very first step to take is to identify the top 25 most common ICD-9 codes used in one’s medical facility. Common diagnosis codes are also available on the Road to 10 website and other resources.

    Teach your healthcare and coding staff how to code the most common cases using the ICD-10 coding set. Using reports via one’s practice management software and billing documents, providers can better identify the most commonly used ICD-9 codes.

    Once the top 25 codes are gathered and there is still time before the ICD-10 implementation deadline, providers are encouraged to expand ICD-10 coding of typical cases past an additional 50 or more codes. This would ensure the majority of a provider’s cases are managed effectively under ICD-10.

    Even though the ICD-10 coding set has expanded to more than 68,000 codes, providers will only need to use a small section of the set. Along with training staff, updating system processes is vital for one’s ICD-10 conversion preparations. All hardcopy and electronic forms need to be updated while information gaps should be resolved before the October 1 deadline.

    Clinical documentation will need to include laterality, the number of encounters (initial or subsequent), kinds of fractures, and other information about related complications. It is useful to put together a documentation checklist detailing new concepts that should be captured with ICD-10 codes. Once systems are in place, ICD-10 end-to-end testing is crucial to ensure a healthcare facility is prepared for the October 1 deadline.

    “With four months remaining to correct issues discovered during testing, the high rate of successful submission of ICD-10 codes is especially encouraging for physician offices since half the claims submitted for end-to-testing were professional claims,” the Coalition for ICD-10 commented on CMS’ latest ICD-10 end-to-end testing results. “These results indicate that significant progress has been made since the January end-to-end testing with the overall rejection rate dropping from 19 to 12 percent and ICD-10 rejections dropping from 3 to 2 percent.”



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...