Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

Staff Training Crucial in ICD-10 Conversion Preparations

By Vera Gruessner

- Healthcare providers who are behind in their ICD-10 conversion preparations may benefit from following the ICD-10 Quick Start Guide provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

ICD-10 Conversion Preparations

The five steps that providers will need to take when it comes to their ICD-10 conversion preparations are the following: (1) developing a plan, (2) training the healthcare staff, (3) updating system processes, (4) working with vendors and health insurers, and (5) testing workflow processes and systems.

When it comes to training the clinical staff (including nurses, doctors, and medical assistants) and moving forward with ICD-10 conversion preparations, it’s vital to focus on new clinical concepts and documentation obtained through ICD-10 codes. When training coding and administrative staff including coders, billers, and practice management employees, the focus should be on ICD-10 fundamentals.

CMS provides a variety of resources including webinars, national provider calls and presentations, the Road to 10 website, and email updates. Physician groups, healthcare organizations, hospitals, payers, and vendors also offer a variety of resources for medical providers who are still behind with some common ICD-10 conversion preparations.

  • New York Approves $45M for Statewide Health Data Exchange
  • AMIA Urges Reset on Electronic Clinical Quality Measures
  • EHR Use a Top Patient Preference in the Doctor’s Office
  • NCQA Recommends 11 Changes to Quality Payment Program Rule
  • HIMSS Analytics: Lack of health IT workers may delay EHR adoption
  • Innovating in health IT at New York eHealth Collaborative
  • AMIA Calls for Lab Data Interoperability Standards Improvements
  • RI Hospital develops use case for Google Glass in telemedicine
  • Is Meaningful Use Responsible for Limited EHR Usability?
  • Meaningful use payments to providers near $17 billion
  • Delays in EHR Integration Ousted Epic Installation
  • Survey: 84% say mHealth tablets make multi-tasking easy
  • How Inbound Data Changes Health IT Interoperability Strategy
  • Study: EHR performance incentives improve small practices
  • Did EHR Workflow Flaw Lead to Ebola Mistake in Dallas?
  • NextGen Healthcare, Cerner achieve bi-lateral certification
  • EHR best practices: Planning Meaningful Use workflow
  • Allscripts to close 12 offices, 1 warehouse in North America
  • Epic Systems Tabbed to Expand Hold of Ambulatory EHR Market
  • Will pathologists be exempt from meaningful use penalties?
  • NIH Director: mHealth needs to show results
  • ECRI Institute helps hospitals reach 2014 Alarm Safety Goal
  • Telemedicine provides accurate vision screenings for premies
  • Final Federal HIT Strategy Plan for Learning Health System
  • HIMSS Seeks Delay in Use of 2015 Edition Certified Technology
  • HIMSS, EHRA respond to FDA health IT regulation framework
  • HIMSS Calls for Minor Changes to ONC Interoperability Advisory
  • ONC launches Health eDecisions Initiative at 4PM
  • 3M to Hold and Build Health Information Systems Business
  • Google takes another stab at healthcare with Calico
  • Epic Systems Preparing to Offer EHR Cloud-Based Solutions
  • ICD-10 Compliance a Struggle for Some Physician Practices
  • Survey: EHR, HIT adoption growing among North Dakota’s rural providers
  • Stage 3 Meaningful Use Proposed Rule: Is More Time Needed?
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center wins Enterprise HIMSS Davies Award of Excellence
  • Cerner Appoints Brent Shafer CEO, Chairman of the Board
  • 85% of Canadians love EHRs; 85% of Americans fear them
  • First statewide clinical data warehouse launched in SC
  • AHIMA 2012: Providers Benefit from EHR, Patient Portals
  • KLAS taps 3M as top medical records coding product of 2012
  • Scribes Improve Physician Satisfaction, EHR Clinical Documentation
  • EHNAC to begin accreditation for accountable care organizations
  • How does a failed meaningful use audit affect providers?
  • iPad, mobile EHR apps skyrocket according to Black Book survey
  • Exercise lowers 30-day readmissions by 34% for COPD patients
  • Independent docs not optimistic about accountable care, EHRs
  • Health data breaches and responses
  • How does social media integrate with EHR, PHI?
  • How Will MACRA Legislation Affect Small Physician Practices?
  • CMS Finds ICD-10 Testing Successful
  • Should your practice invest in bundled EHR, billing software?
  • Cerner Selects Team of Businesses to Aid VA EHR Implementation
  • Cerner, Epic EHR Hospitals to Share Patient EHRs in NC
  • Virginia bills target patient-centered care via ACOs, PCMHs
  • Meaningful use to make providers more efficient, effective?
  • HIMSS Analytics introduces Continuity of Care Maturity Model
  • Unlocking EHR Systems, Advancing Health IT Interoperability
  • CHIME CIOs still concerned about staff shortages
  • AMA and EHRA weigh in on Stage 2
  • EHR Interoperability Helps, Hinders Immunization Data Quality
  • How the Healthcare Industry Tackled Data Blocking in 2015
  • How EHR Use Drives Clinical Quality Reporting, Accountability
  • Federal agencies draft HIT risk-based regulatory framework
  • Standardizing Adverse Drug Reaction Data in EHR Documentation
  • Raising patient satisfaction via Epic EHR, HIT: CIO Series
  • The ‘Heart’ of Stage 3 Meaningful Use Requirements
  • Regenstrief Begins Two-Year Study of Emergency Department HIE Use
  • Financials Risks of Implementing Certified EHR Technology
  • January 17: ONC, MIT, Tufts begin Blue Button Codeathon
  • For Stage 2 Meaningful Use Attestation, Pick a Larger EHR Vendor
  • Massachusetts bill looks to HIT to help reduce spending
  • How Meaningful Use Requirements Hinder EHR Interoperability
  • CMS Clarifies Meaningful Use Requirements for Public Health
  • UK Hospital Earns Most Wired for Use of Epic EHR Technology
  • Virtualization is the new healthcare reality
  • Will FHIR, APIs Help or Hinder Health Information Exchanges?
  • Verizon announces secure cloud messaging service for health data
  • New VA clinics open to address veteran health needs
  • GAO Urges DoD, VA to Establish EHR Interoperability Goals
  • Top Physician EHR Issues Disrupting Clinical Workflows
  • Many docs still have questions about meaningful use
  • Will Carequality Lead EHR Vendors to EHR Interoperability?
  • Highlights of HIMSS13: Clinical analytics, HIM, and big data
  • Identifying, resolving 3 common gotchas of EHR go-lives
  • CMS extends ICD-10 partial code freeze to match new timeline
  • Meritus Health Launches $100M Epic EHR Implementation Project
  • Meaningful Use Tracker may fit small providers
  • What is the role of health plans in healthcare reform, IT?
  • Heart groups promote interoperable cardiology terms for EHR use
  • Will Altering EHR Incentive Programs Raise EHR Implementation?
  • Rural hospitals fall behind on EHR adoption, mortality rates
  • EHR vendor selection considerations should look beyond meaningful use
  • How Providers, Developers Can Collaborate for EHR Usability
  • New Discharge Process Requires Health IT Integration
  • Lack of Behavioral Health Data Threatens Physician EHR Use
  • Patient Portals and Tracking Devices Driving Engagement
  • WEDI Seeks ICD-10 Readiness Survey Responses from Stakeholders
  • CMS Issues Merit-based Incentive Payment Systems Guidance
  • Affordable Care and HITECH Acts are not as separate as some think
  • Netsmart to Acquire Change Healthcare Home Health IT Solutions
  • The very first step to take is to identify the top 25 most common ICD-9 codes used in one’s medical facility. Common diagnosis codes are also available on the Road to 10 website and other resources.

    Teach your healthcare and coding staff how to code the most common cases using the ICD-10 coding set. Using reports via one’s practice management software and billing documents, providers can better identify the most commonly used ICD-9 codes.

    Once the top 25 codes are gathered and there is still time before the ICD-10 implementation deadline, providers are encouraged to expand ICD-10 coding of typical cases past an additional 50 or more codes. This would ensure the majority of a provider’s cases are managed effectively under ICD-10.

    Even though the ICD-10 coding set has expanded to more than 68,000 codes, providers will only need to use a small section of the set. Along with training staff, updating system processes is vital for one’s ICD-10 conversion preparations. All hardcopy and electronic forms need to be updated while information gaps should be resolved before the October 1 deadline.

    Clinical documentation will need to include laterality, the number of encounters (initial or subsequent), kinds of fractures, and other information about related complications. It is useful to put together a documentation checklist detailing new concepts that should be captured with ICD-10 codes. Once systems are in place, ICD-10 end-to-end testing is crucial to ensure a healthcare facility is prepared for the October 1 deadline.

    “With four months remaining to correct issues discovered during testing, the high rate of successful submission of ICD-10 codes is especially encouraging for physician offices since half the claims submitted for end-to-testing were professional claims,” the Coalition for ICD-10 commented on CMS’ latest ICD-10 end-to-end testing results. “These results indicate that significant progress has been made since the January end-to-end testing with the overall rejection rate dropping from 19 to 12 percent and ICD-10 rejections dropping from 3 to 2 percent.”

    ICD-10 Conversion Preparations



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...