Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

Staff Training Crucial in ICD-10 Conversion Preparations

By Vera Gruessner

- Healthcare providers who are behind in their ICD-10 conversion preparations may benefit from following the ICD-10 Quick Start Guide provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

ICD-10 Conversion Preparations

The five steps that providers will need to take when it comes to their ICD-10 conversion preparations are the following: (1) developing a plan, (2) training the healthcare staff, (3) updating system processes, (4) working with vendors and health insurers, and (5) testing workflow processes and systems.

When it comes to training the clinical staff (including nurses, doctors, and medical assistants) and moving forward with ICD-10 conversion preparations, it’s vital to focus on new clinical concepts and documentation obtained through ICD-10 codes. When training coding and administrative staff including coders, billers, and practice management employees, the focus should be on ICD-10 fundamentals.

CMS provides a variety of resources including webinars, national provider calls and presentations, the Road to 10 website, and email updates. Physician groups, healthcare organizations, hospitals, payers, and vendors also offer a variety of resources for medical providers who are still behind with some common ICD-10 conversion preparations.

  • Do PCMHs really reduce emergency room use and save money?
  • Medical Groups Urge Repair of EHR Incentive Programs
  • Looking ahead: ICD-10 tasks to complete before October 1, 2014
  • Doctors Not Meeting Consumer Patient Engagement Expectations
  • AMA, Medical Societies Ask Congress to Alter Meaningful Use
  • Lippincott Williams & Wilkins offers nurses EHR tool
  • ICD-10 update: Readiness comments should recall 5010
  • What Factors Encourage Physician HIE Adoption, Use?
  • AHA, HIMSS Support CMS Plans for Meaningful Use, MyHealthEData
  • Meditech adoption leads to financial losses at two hospitals
  • Meaningful Use, ICD-10, Epic, Cerner Lead Top 2015 Headlines
  • EHRs drive proliferation of ACOs, PCMHs in quest for quality
  • Mostashari:  Patience is required for ROI on EHR, meaningful use
  • Real-time EHR data analytics helps reduce readmissions by 5%
  • Rural health as a training ground for HIE, healthcare reform
  • ONC, CMMI Institute Release Patient Data Quality Framework
  • Researchers Unveil Bidirectional ICD-9 to ICD-10 Mapping Tool
  • Clinical Decision Support Decreases Sepsis Mortality in AL
  • Cambridge Health Alliance agrees with BIDMC to join ACO
  • For healthcare analytics, you need to have goals in sight
  • Readers Debate Causes of, Solutions to Limited EHR Usability
  • St. Vincent Medical, IHIE Partner for EHR Interoperability
  • HIM and HIT Fields Team Up on Interoperability Governance
  • EHR Optimization Before, During, and After Implementation
  • Shinseki reaffirms commitment to VistA EHR in budget hearing
  • What is the future of standards for EHR, interoperability?
  • Fla. law would make private health plans cover telehealth
  • Pennsylvania eHealth Collaborative extends DIRECT grant
  • ONC Update Details Hospital EHR Incentive Program Progress
  • Improved Health Data Exchange at Heart of UVM Epic EHR Plan
  • ONC Appoints Cook County CMIO as Next Chief Medical Officer
  • Top Features, Functions to Advance Direct Interoperability
  • Studies show EHR, CPOE provide positive ROI long term
  • ONC: EHR adoption skyrockets at safety net health centers
  • Quincy Medical Group joins IHS ACO
  • CVS Among Newest Additions to Surescripts Medication Service
  • Apps Stumble with Patient-Generated Health Data Burdens
  • Meaningful Use Fails to Advance Pediatric EHR Adoption
  • Health IT Safety Collaborative Can Aid EHR Use, Patient Safety
  • CMS Proposes 90-Day Reporting Period for 2016 Meaningful Use
  • Top ICD-10 resources, tips, and best practices
  • Missouri, Wisconsin move forward with statewide HIE
  • DOD to develop personal health plans through online assessment app
  • OIG Early Implementation Review Enforces Payment Reforms
  • Inadequate EHR training leads to rejected Medicare claims
  • CMS Requests Feedback on New eCQMs for Inpatient Hospitals
  • How can EHR adoption move providers beyond meaningful use?
  • Practice management, revenue cycle vendors form industry group
  • Have EHRs, CPOE set the stage for ICD-10 acceptance?
  • EHR replacement gone wrong: Who owns patient data?
  • Renewed Call for HHS Support to National Patient Identifier
  • HIE, EHR familiarity grows, but provider frustrations remain
  • DoD takes new EHR direction, but it still isn’t the right one
  • EHR usability takes precedence during product design: Q&A
  • Meeting Meaningful Use Requirements for Transitions of Care
  • How Changes in Primary Care Delivery Impact EHR Selection
  • CMS Offers Expanded Telehealth Coverage for Providers
  • Cerner Expands R&D Hub to Improve Population Health Management
  • HIE patient portals may help providers meet Stage 2 MU
  • Senator provides key recommendations to reduce medical errors
  • How does medical device integration alter EHR adoption, use?
  • Minnesota Physician EHR Use to Target HIV Testing
  • Q&A: Maine HIE sees high satisfaction in 2012, new tasks in 2013
  • Epic, ICD-10, government shutdown are hottest topics of 2013
  • ONC: Open source CQM EHR certification tool Cypress now available
  • CMS, ONC to Hold eCQI Resource Center Overview
  • Pediatric CQMs: Clinical quality measures in Stage 2 Meaningful Use
  • Direct messaging enables smoother transitions of care in Tenn.
  • ICD-10, ACA survey shows concerns for impact on daily tasks
  • ICD-10 Delay, Meaningful Use Changes Rocked Healthcare in 2014
  • Fee-for-Service Reimbursement Limits Telehealth Adoption
  • How Does FHIR Fit into Recent Interoperability Initiatives?
  • Are HISPs a help or hurdle for health information exchange?
  • “Let’s face it, guys,” ICD-10 will go ahead on October 1, 2014
  • Why is true interoperability crucial to healthcare’s future?
  • PA Hospital Wins HIMSS Davies Award for Patient Safety, Analytics
  • AHIMA: Hospitals lag on ICD-10 planning, steering committees
  • AMIA Details Value-Based Care Health IT Infrastructure Needs
  • Updated ONC SAFER Guides Encourage EHR Usability, Safety
  • Senate passes one-year SGR patch, ICD-10 delay bill
  • What role do nurses play in successful health IT adoption?
  • PCMH transformation takes governance, determination, EHR savvy
  • Updated Clinical Quality Measures Revealed by CMS
  • ONC Tabs $625K for Health IT, EHR App Development Contests
  • Changing of the Guard at ONC, Interoperability Remains Focus
  • Patient Safety Not Improved by Cutting Resident Working Hours
  • Hoping for ICD-11 is “Waiting for Godot,” ICD-10 Coalition Says
  • NY Health Information Exchange Improves ED Quality, Efficiency
  • Minnesota’s St. Cloud uses Merge for Meaningful Use
  • Affordable Care Act to broaden care access from HHS funds
  • Who’s responsible for resolving EHR-HIE interoperability?
  • $1.2M Sutter Health Grant Uses EHR Data for Precision Medicine
  • Sanders: Bedside support will flag patients before they’re sick
  • Epic, athenahealth, Others Implement Carequality Framework
  • Healtheway names founding members from healthcare, health IT
  • CMS Aiding Small, Rural Practices Can Improve MIPS Participation
  • HHS plan for minimizing HIT risks to patient safety still missing
  • How Cloud-based EHR Platform Improves Remote Monitoring
  • EHR implementation timeline for hospitals
  • Why practice size is no excuse for choosing the wrong EHR
  • The very first step to take is to identify the top 25 most common ICD-9 codes used in one’s medical facility. Common diagnosis codes are also available on the Road to 10 website and other resources.

    Teach your healthcare and coding staff how to code the most common cases using the ICD-10 coding set. Using reports via one’s practice management software and billing documents, providers can better identify the most commonly used ICD-9 codes.

    Once the top 25 codes are gathered and there is still time before the ICD-10 implementation deadline, providers are encouraged to expand ICD-10 coding of typical cases past an additional 50 or more codes. This would ensure the majority of a provider’s cases are managed effectively under ICD-10.

    Even though the ICD-10 coding set has expanded to more than 68,000 codes, providers will only need to use a small section of the set. Along with training staff, updating system processes is vital for one’s ICD-10 conversion preparations. All hardcopy and electronic forms need to be updated while information gaps should be resolved before the October 1 deadline.

    Clinical documentation will need to include laterality, the number of encounters (initial or subsequent), kinds of fractures, and other information about related complications. It is useful to put together a documentation checklist detailing new concepts that should be captured with ICD-10 codes. Once systems are in place, ICD-10 end-to-end testing is crucial to ensure a healthcare facility is prepared for the October 1 deadline.

    “With four months remaining to correct issues discovered during testing, the high rate of successful submission of ICD-10 codes is especially encouraging for physician offices since half the claims submitted for end-to-testing were professional claims,” the Coalition for ICD-10 commented on CMS’ latest ICD-10 end-to-end testing results. “These results indicate that significant progress has been made since the January end-to-end testing with the overall rejection rate dropping from 19 to 12 percent and ICD-10 rejections dropping from 3 to 2 percent.”



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...