Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

Staff Training Crucial in ICD-10 Conversion Preparations

By Vera Gruessner

- Healthcare providers who are behind in their ICD-10 conversion preparations may benefit from following the ICD-10 Quick Start Guide provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

ICD-10 Conversion Preparations

The five steps that providers will need to take when it comes to their ICD-10 conversion preparations are the following: (1) developing a plan, (2) training the healthcare staff, (3) updating system processes, (4) working with vendors and health insurers, and (5) testing workflow processes and systems.

When it comes to training the clinical staff (including nurses, doctors, and medical assistants) and moving forward with ICD-10 conversion preparations, it’s vital to focus on new clinical concepts and documentation obtained through ICD-10 codes. When training coding and administrative staff including coders, billers, and practice management employees, the focus should be on ICD-10 fundamentals.

CMS provides a variety of resources including webinars, national provider calls and presentations, the Road to 10 website, and email updates. Physician groups, healthcare organizations, hospitals, payers, and vendors also offer a variety of resources for medical providers who are still behind with some common ICD-10 conversion preparations.

  • How important is physician engagement to CPOE adoption?
  • Meaningful use incentives get chopped under sequestration
  • Improving Payer Engagement in Health Information Exchange
  • CMS Reviews 2016 Meaningful Use Reporting Requirements
  • HRSA launches new website, webinar for safety net providers
  • Are Meaningful Use Incentives Worth a Provider’s Investment?
  • What Slowed Progress of Health Data Exchange in 2014?
  • LinkedIn users sound off on AMA resistance to ICD-10
  • AMA, MGMA eye extension of meaningful use hardship exception
  • Epic EHR adoption, quality efforts raise revenues in Michigan
  • How Patients Factor in the Health Data Exchange Equation
  • AHA highlights financial prep needed for value-based care
  • ONC Health Data Exchange Framework Draws Differing Opinions
  • 10 steps for providers to survive ARRA, ACA requirements
  • 92% of Nurses Dissatisfied with EHR Technology, Health IT
  • ONC seeks public input on consumer eHealth strategy
  • WEDI offers ICD-10 compliance webinar series
  • AMA Lists EHRs, Meaningful Use, ICD-10 as Top 2015 Challenges
  • Industry Experts Back EHR Meaningful Use Overhaul
  • Kentucky rural healthcare provider uses cloud-based EHR
  • Survey: 84% say mHealth tablets make multi-tasking easy
  • Eligible Hospitals Must Use QNet for Meaningful Use Attestation
  • NC Healthcare Alliance Joins NRHI for Care Quality Improvement
  • Will Patient Health Outcomes Improve With Interoperability?
  • What Does EHR Interoperability Mean for MACRA Implementation?
  • Verizon announces secure cloud messaging service for health data
  • Patients to Step Up Health Data Exchange Involvement in 2016
  • Is current EHR technology ready for accountable care?
  • Reduction of inpatient care is challenging hospital revenues
  • Health Information Exchange Reduces Redundant Testing
  • Six accountable care strategies to reduce 30-day readmissions
  • How Health Data Infrastructure Factors into Fee Schedule Policies
  • Alaska legislature passes telemedicine bill to expand coverage
  • Revised 21st Century Cures Act Targets Effective EHR Use
  • Nurses Asked to Falsify Patient Health Records at Kansas Hospital
  • EHR Use, Care Coordination Key to Integrated Primary Care
  • How Does Health IT Interoperability Affect Patient Safety?
  • Cerner Makes Key Revenue Cycle Management Hire
  • ONC Chief Emphasizes Commitments Toward Connected Health IT
  • athenahealth Not Engaging With Elliott Acquisition Offers
  • Allscripts Recovering From EHR Downtime After Ransomware Attack
  • S4S Pilot to Enable Patient Access to Health Information
  • Epic EHR Replacement Success at Lovelace Health System
  • Five Senators Call for Greater EHR Interoperability Guidance
  • UI Trustees Debate Value of $62M Epic EHR Replacement Deal
  • Sebelius takes responsibility for HIX “debacle” in hearing
  • EHR Data Interoperability Should Meet Five Use Cases
  • HIE and big data: Leveraging data analytics to improve care
  • Why can’t rural health clinics receive EHR Medicare incentives?
  • Mobility of EHR renders paper unfit for purpose
  • HELP Committee Again Seeks Delay of Stage 3 Meaningful Use
  • New HHS rule grants patients direct access to lab results
  • ONC opts against proposed voluntary 2015 EHR certification
  • How Health Orgs Realize EHR Benefits, Quality Improvements
  • mHealth heats up, but will smartphone medicine leave you burned?
  • A Successful EHR Implementation Is About More Than Go-Live
  • CMS Issues Merit-based Incentive Payment Systems Guidance
  • Why is establishing standards of EHR use important?
  • Data Governance Failures Exposed in VHA Eligibility System
  • EHR Vendors Still Seeing Low Physician Satisfaction Scores
  • Does Certified EHR Technology Need Simplified Standards?
  • ONC reminds providers of July 1 hardship exception deadline
  • Senator Gives 5 Reasons to Delay Stage 3 Meaningful Use
  • ONC Report Upswing in Electronic Health Information Exchange
  • Cerner Crying Foul Over University of Illinois Epic EHR Contract
  • Case study: How clinical analytics helps with meaningful use
  • NCQA says potential to engage patients with HIT “untapped”
  • Advanced EHR Use Shows Potential to Lower Patient Costs
  • How can EHR adoption move providers beyond meaningful use?
  • Suspension of RAC audits could cost Medicare $2 billion
  • DeSalvo delivers first remarks to Health IT Policy Committee
  • Bill to allow new Meaningful Use exemptions introduced
  • Are there changes ahead in EHR vendor selection?
  • Physician burnout: The not-so-hidden casualty of EHRs
  • HHS plan for minimizing HIT risks to patient safety still missing
  • CIO series: Atlantic General’s Barbara Riddell
  • athenahealth Layoffs Impact 500 Employees in Attempt to Cut Costs
  • athenahealth Acquisition Bid Progresses to Second Round
  • Patient Engagement Rises with Consumer EHR Satisfaction
  • Self-Reported Health Data Improves Outcomes in Cancer Study
  • Federal Agencies Accredited for Health Information Exchange
  • Nursing approach to meaningful use, EHR adoption: CIO series
  • A call for transparent data
  • Has the Meaningful Use Final Rule Levelled the Playing Field?
  • Oct. 2: ONC to Discuss New 2014 Edition EHR Certification
  • ONC announces new grant opportunities for HIE technology
  • CHIME comments on EHR hospital inpatient quality reporting
  • Carrying Forward Provider Health Information Exchange
  • AMA wants to improve EHR adoption, minimize distractions
  • ONC Asks Public to Contribute to Health IT Certification
  • Will the SGR Bill Lead to an ICD-10 Implementation Delay?
  • Physician series: OB/GYN EHR hurdles
  • Nebraska Docs Feel Pressure of Meaningful Use Requirements
  • 3 Hospitals Sign onto Mercy SaaS for Epic EHR Implementation
  • Adding HIE Info to EHR Data Raises Medication Accuracy to 91%
  • CORHIO to connect South Metro Primary Care to HIE
  • EHR software recalled after medication notes disappear
  • With FTC approval, Cerner nears completion of Siemens deal
  • Unsustainable Workloads Could Lead to Physician Burnout
  • Illinois health information exchange expands
  • The very first step to take is to identify the top 25 most common ICD-9 codes used in one’s medical facility. Common diagnosis codes are also available on the Road to 10 website and other resources.

    Teach your healthcare and coding staff how to code the most common cases using the ICD-10 coding set. Using reports via one’s practice management software and billing documents, providers can better identify the most commonly used ICD-9 codes.

    Once the top 25 codes are gathered and there is still time before the ICD-10 implementation deadline, providers are encouraged to expand ICD-10 coding of typical cases past an additional 50 or more codes. This would ensure the majority of a provider’s cases are managed effectively under ICD-10.

    Even though the ICD-10 coding set has expanded to more than 68,000 codes, providers will only need to use a small section of the set. Along with training staff, updating system processes is vital for one’s ICD-10 conversion preparations. All hardcopy and electronic forms need to be updated while information gaps should be resolved before the October 1 deadline.

    Clinical documentation will need to include laterality, the number of encounters (initial or subsequent), kinds of fractures, and other information about related complications. It is useful to put together a documentation checklist detailing new concepts that should be captured with ICD-10 codes. Once systems are in place, ICD-10 end-to-end testing is crucial to ensure a healthcare facility is prepared for the October 1 deadline.

    “With four months remaining to correct issues discovered during testing, the high rate of successful submission of ICD-10 codes is especially encouraging for physician offices since half the claims submitted for end-to-testing were professional claims,” the Coalition for ICD-10 commented on CMS’ latest ICD-10 end-to-end testing results. “These results indicate that significant progress has been made since the January end-to-end testing with the overall rejection rate dropping from 19 to 12 percent and ICD-10 rejections dropping from 3 to 2 percent.”



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 1000,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...