Electronic Health Records

Use & Optimization News

Top 3 EHR Challenges Facing the Healthcare Industry, Providers

Although EHRs present many potential benefits, providers often face a slew of EHR challenges, causing hurdles in their healthcare delivery.

By Sara Heath

- When the HITECH Act first came into play, it was meant to spur widespread EHR adoption to help the healthcare industry achieve the Triple Aim. But with every improvement, there have also been EHR challenges for providers to mitigate.


Many healthcare professionals have reported improved patient safety and more accurate clinical documentation by using EHR systems, but they have also encountered several challenges — ranging from difficulties meeting the demands of quality reporting programs to setbacks linked to poor system usability.

EHR quality reporting

Meaningful use is the federal program credited by government officials with sparking the widespread growth of EHR use. As a result of EHR incentive payments for the use of the certified EHR technology, an increasing number of healthcare professionals adopted EHR systems.

  • EHRA Questions Scope of ONC Interoperability Roadmap
  • Post-Acute Health Information Exchange Services On the Way
  • Impact of Meaningful Use Requirements on Health IT Leadership
  • July ICD-10 Testing Shows CMS Readiness for Implementation
  • Are Policies, Standards Enough to Boost EHR Interoperability?
  • Value-based Care to Test Small, Rural Provider HIT in 2017
  • Healthy Futures funds Washington rural health center
  • Support for SGR repeal bill builds among physician societies
  • Why should providers continue with Stage 2 Meaningful Use?
  • What can studies of EHR learn from eRx?
  • NCQA drafts updated guidelines for PCMHs, requests comment
  • How the Integrated Epic EHR/PM System Handles Reporting
  • GE Healthcare EHR Earns 2015 Edition ONC Health IT Certification
  • Verizon offers telehealth consults with smartphones, tablets
  • Best Hospitals Keep Improving EMR Technology
  • Bill aims to give permanence to Medicare ACOs, providers
  • Physician series: EHR vendor went bankrupt right after paying
  • Blue Button Initiative presents issues for EHR compatibility
  • Post-acute care quality bill moves from House to Senate
  • Task Force Makes Health IT Interoperability Recommendations
  • AAFP: SGR Changes to Meaningful Use May Be an “Improvement”
  • What about healthcare must change for analytics to flourish?
  • AHRQ to study effect of EHR, health IT on ambulatory workflow
  • Why a ‘Safe Harbor’ ICD-10 Transition Period is Harmful
  • True Interoperability Needs Health IT Standards, Use Cases
  • EHR analytics predict link between Type 2 diabetes, dementia
  • EHR Adoption Unsuccessful in Reducing Administrative Costs
  • EHR replacement: Benefits of a single, streamlined system
  • Case study: How clinical analytics helps with meaningful use
  • EHR software recalled after medication notes disappear
  • EHR System, Physician Burnout Contributed to Problems at ME Hospital
  • HHS Must Continue Addressing Health Data Exchange Barriers
  • Final Steps to Take Before the ICD-10 Implementation Deadline
  • Improved Health Data Exchange at Heart of UVM Epic EHR Plan
  • Senate Committee Eyes Changes to Meaningful Use Requirements
  • Boosting EHR Usability, Safety Throughout the EHR Life Cycle
  • Farzad Mostashari: Man On A Digital Mission
  • Study reveals NLP capability to detect patterns in patient data
  • EHR Use Continues to Contribute to Physician Burnout
  • Three Steps to Follow Before ICD-10 Conversion Deadline
  • NJ-HITEC readies for Stage 1 Meaningful Use deadline
  • Adoption of Patient Portals Growing in Older Populations
  • Pew Urges ONC Expand EHR Data Included in Health Data Exchange
  • EHR System Satisfaction Declines to 34% Among Physicians
  • BPC Urges Interoperability Changes to Medical Innovation Strategies
  • SHIEC Patient Centered Data Health Information Exchange Goes Live
  • Pennsylvania Medicaid earning its stripes
  • Study: Only 27% of providers see ROI on EHR adoption
  • What will your EHR implementation cost you?
  • mHealth startups, EHR solutions secure big grants, VC funding
  • EHR contract guide will help docs keep data after replacement
  • More Voices Added to the National Dialogue on Interoperability
  • Patient Engagement Driven by Incentives Builds Better Health
  • Leadership shuffle atop the VA continues following scandal
  • All ND Hospitals Will Use EHRs by 2015 as State HIE Goes Live
  • Meaningful use: Building a community of care, physician relations
  • How CommonWell Adapts to Constant Health IT Innovation
  • Clinical decision tools help emergency rooms reduce drug errors
  • Carequality Gathers Support for Interoperability Framework
  • EHR Optimization to Boost Value-Based Care for Larger Practices
  • White House Seeks Input on Precision Medicine Initiative
  • How Front-End Speech Recognition Adoption Impacts EHR Usability
  • How IHIE does health information exchange, interoperability
  • Providers reluctant to address EHR, health IT patient safety
  • Black Book: Dermatology is huge market for EHR adoption
  • Senators call for greater Medicare claims data transparency
  • MeHI $193K Awards to CEHRT Vendors Target Behavioral Health
  • How do mandates affect docs, health IT staff differently?
  • ONC Asks Public to Contribute to Health IT Certification
  • PA eHealth Partnership Authority awards home health grants
  • ONC, Kaiser Permanente discuss the role of health IT in patient care
  • mHealth apps will be worth $26B by 2017 and reach 1.7B users
  • 31 million patients receive ACO care as delivery model expands
  • NQF Framework Aims to Improve Interoperability Measurement
  • ONC Promotes Health IT Interoperability with New Tech Lab
  • Consumers Ramp Up Access of Electronic Health Records
  • Benefits of VDI Implementation to Physician Productivity
  • How Surescripts Approaches Patient Safety Improvements
  • Is the Triple Aim of Healthcare Achievable Through EHRs?
  • How style guides sustain effective consistency in EHR design
  • University Hospitals, Cigna partner for accountable care
  • EHR Incentive Programs top $19.2 billion in payments
  • Audit Questions Health Information Exchange Oversight in VT
  • Greenway Health Achieves 2015 ONC Health IT Certification
  • Trump Administration Ousts VA Secretary David Shulkin
  • HIE best practices: Keeping data safe
  • Industry Groups Share Views on Proposed MACRA Implementation
  • How Meaningful Use Requirements Support Population Health
  • EHRA Recommends CMMI Align Regulations, CEHRT Requirements
  • Will health information exchange enable data integration?
  • HHS finalizes higher payments to primary care physicians
  • Report Ranks Top Five Best, Worst States for EHR Adoption
  • Common Clinical Quality Measures Providers Need to Report
  • Navy eyes advances in interagency iEHR, HIE
  • How EHR adoption, implementation affects project analysts
  • Do Patient Portals, EHR Implementation Boost Patient Engagement?
  • 85% of Healthcare Organizations Feel Confident for ICD-10
  • Physicians, hospitals using EHRs doubles between 2012, 2013
  • Utah works on ACO tenets in Medicaid overhaul
  • How does provider-developer collaboration improve health IT?
  • However, these programs quickly came to present several problems. In the second phase of the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, Stage 2 Meaningful Use, healthcare professionals realized they would have to depend on others — providers and patients — in order to meet reporting requirements.

    Slated to begin in 2018, Stage 3 Meaningful Use has likewise imposed burdens on healthcare organizations and providers. Although this set of requirements now only applies to eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals, many are still feeling challenged to meet interoperability, patient engagement, and clinical quality measure requirements.

    In lieu of Stage 3 Meaningful Use, eligible professionals — now known as eligible clinicians — will have a new program to contend with — the Quality Payment Program. Starting in 2017, these providers must report participation in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) or Alternative Payment Models (APMs), comprehensive reporting programs integrating many of the same principles of meaningful use and other quality reporting programs.

    Preparing for MACRA implementation has already served as a source of frustration for providers, so much so that CMS recently announced plans to ease first year requirements of the Quality Payment Program, granting providers several different ease-in options to help them transition.

    EHR interoperability

    EHRs have improved elements of clinical documentation, helping to improve patient safety. However, technologies from different vendors don’t always play nice, presenting issues when one patient receives treatment at two different points of care.

    Robust EHR interoperability is crucial for care coordination and patient-centered care. However, reports show that it is seriously lacking in most EHR systems. Although interoperability and health information exchange are both significant aspects of meaningful use and the Quality Payment Program, providers are still being hung up on the issue.

    That being said, the industry is working to solve these problems. Application programming interfaces (APIs) such as the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) show signs of a better future in health IT, as do federal visions for advancing healthcare interoperability such as the ONC Health IT Interoperability Roadmap.

    EHR usability

    Perhaps one of the biggest health IT-related provider gripes is EHR usability. Many report that EHR technology add to rather than subtract from provider workloads — owing to something as basic as poor navigation.

    Recent research shows that 92 percent of nurses are dissatisfied with their EHR technology, and much of those negative feelings are attributable to complicated interfaces. Eighty-five percent of nurses said their EHRs consistently had flaws or technological glitches getting in the way of their workflows.

    EHR usability issues are also getting in the way of patient and provider relationships, with 90 percent of nurses reporting this.

    Another recent survey from the American Medical Association shows that for every hour providers spend face-to-face with patients, they spend another two working on clinical documentation and desk work. This shows that providers have too much work to do on their EHRs, and that it is getting in the way of delivering personal and patient-centered care.

    Dig Deeper:



    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 1000,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...