Electronic Health Records

Policy & Regulation News

Top EHR Vendors by Eligible Professional, Hospital EHR Use

A recent public use file released by ONC combines data from both the EHR Incentive Programs and RECs on EHR use.

By Kyle Murphy, PhD

- Recent complaints about the EHR Incentive Programs have centered on meaningful use data and how it might inform EHR use moving forward.

Eligible professional and hospital EHR use

While the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) may not be able to appease all inquirers, data do exist that provide insight into EHR use tied to EHR vendor selection.

In order to demonstrate meaningful use, providers must attest using a certified EHR technology. To assist eligible professionals in their pursuit of EHR incentives, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology established a regional extension center (REC) program to assist thee providers.

A recent public use file released by ONC combines data from both the EHR Incentive Programs and RECs on the EHR technology providers reported using.

  • Health IT Interoperability Champion DeSalvo Leaving ONC
  • ACOs Still Battling Health Data Exchange Difficulties
  • Interoperability, finances, participation still plague HIEs
  • LinkedIn users respond to Top 10 Meaningful Use Challenges
  • Why don’t first responders have instant access to EHRs?
  • AHIMA: Hospitals lag on ICD-10 planning, steering committees
  • How Health IT Integration Can Help Reduce Diagnostic Errors
  • Looking forward: Readers face Stage 2 Meaningful Use in 2013
  • Standardized Provider Data a Must for Health Data Exchange
  • Remediation in the EHR-enabled clinic
  • VA, DoD firm up plans to accelerate joint iEHR system
  • VA Will Make Final Cerner EHR Contract Decision by Memorial Day
  • Seema Verma Confirmed to Serve as New CMS Administrator
  • CMS Issues Quality Payment Program Year 2 Final Rule
  • Epic, DaVita Partner to Develop Chronic Kidney Disease EHR System
  • Minnesota’s St. Cloud uses Merge for Meaningful Use
  • Care Coordination Paramount as New ACO Models Roll Out
  • Texas Health Information Network Joins Carequality
  • Geisinger Health System CEO, President to step down in 2015
  • Q&A with American Telemedicine Association: Part II
  • ONC Patient Matching Algorithm Challenge Selects 3 Winners
  • Cerner Partners with HealthSouth for Improved Care Coordination
  • Meaningful use audits: Healthcare CMIO reveals details
  • Texas HIE to Link Social Determinants of Health to Patient EHRs
  • Affordable Care and HITECH Acts are not as separate as some think
  • How is accountability affecting rate of readmissions?
  • Benefits of Patient-Generated Health Data to EHR Use
  • Software Advice lists top 10 EHR vendors for meaningful use
  • True engagement is about meeting patients where they are
  • 40% of EHR buyers are looking to replace their health IT
  • Why Optimism Is Building for National Patient Identifier
  • CHIME Announces Patient Identification Challenge
  • How will HIT in 2014 impact the work of a healthcare CIO?
  • HIMSS survey: 93% of physicians use mobile health technology daily
  • Fee-for-Service Reimbursement Limits Telehealth Adoption
  • ONC officially turns NwHIN into eHealth Exchange
  • Does Use and Implementation of EHR Technology Affect Care?
  • Siemens Partnership Connects Test Results to EHR Systems
  • mHealth, Patient Portal Boom Increases Patient Engagement
  • New Healthcare Interoperability Center Opens in Tennessee
  • HHS departments seek flexible health IT to engage and communicate
  • Radiologists slow to attest to Stage 1 Meaningful Use despite 90% eligibility
  • AMIA Urges Reset on Electronic Clinical Quality Measures
  • Rural California turns to mobile health IT for patient support
  • Hospital Revenue Risk: Patients Not Engaging Via Mobile Apps
  • CMS Offers 3 Listening Sessions on MACRA Proposed Rules
  • EHR Downtime: What to Do When an IT Disaster Strikes
  • eICU Telehealth Data Allows Clinical Analytics for Researchers
  • How Stage 2 will impact electronic health records
  • Real-time EHR data analytics helps reduce readmissions by 5%
  • WEDI Seeks ICD-10 Readiness Survey Responses from Stakeholders
  • Updated Clinical Quality Measures Revealed by CMS
  • Long-term EHR projects and the short-term healthcare mindset
  • CMS Offers Aid for Clinical Quality Measure Reporting in MIPS
  • Using EHR, HIE to share vaccine data improves public health
  • Medical scribes boost EHR productivity, streamline workflow
  • HHS Appoints New Members to Federal Advisory Committees
  • NYCHHC Reaches Key Epic Implementation Milestone on Schedule
  • Halamka: ICD-10 deadline will set providers up for failure
  • ICD-10 success involves looking ahead, strategic planning: Q&A
  • Medicare payments set to take a tumble over the “fiscal cliff”
  • AT&T reveals top 5 healthcare IT, mHealth trends for 2013
  • Pediatric telehealth UCLA shows positive results for obesity
  • Is meaningful use driving eligible providers off course?
  • AHIMA: Half of providers plan to go ahead with ICD-10 anyway
  • ONC Clarifies Health IT Interoperability Under HIPAA
  • AMA CEO Outlines Problems with EHR Use, Clinical Data
  • CMS Issues Provider Contact Sheet for ICD-10 Code Questions
  • 50% of Physicians Want Better Access to Patient Data in EHR Use
  • West Virginia goes live with statewide HIE
  • App Integrates Mutation Data for Pediatric Cancer Research
  • Maximizing EHR Investments through Clinical Surveillance
  • Clinical Decision Support Central to Advancing Cancer Care
  • Clinical decision tools help emergency rooms reduce drug errors
  • Epic EHR Implementation Leads to Cerner EHR Replacement
  • Portal’s Promise: Engaging Patients in Preventive Healthcare
  • Physician series: Beyond meaningful use with Winfield Young, MD
  • Vendor dispute leaves rural practice without EHR data access
  • HITPC workgroups seek to improve quality of quality data
  • NQF Advises CMS Align Quality Measures, Cut Administrative Burden
  • Small Number of States Successful with State-Led HIE Use
  • Savings, ACOs driving adoption of cloud-based health IT
  • Rural Illinois ACO to Implement Cerner Population Health Platform
  • Research Is Scarce on Impact of Health Information Exchanges
  • AMA, Medical Societies Ask Congress to Alter Meaningful Use
  • IL Procurement Board Recommends Voiding UI Epic EHR Contract
  • New ONC CHPL Site Will Enhance Health IT Product Comparison
  • WEDI: Eight ICD-10 tasks for providers to complete now
  • CMS cancels ICD-10 end-to-end test pilot in wake of delay
  • Physicians use mobile health apps for research and patient education
  • Hospital Stage 2 Meaningful Use Attestations Near 77 Percent
  • Will the AMA halt ICD-10 with new letter, Twitter campaign?
  • National Coordinator highlights election’s effect on health IT
  • Multiple deadlines, few candidates boosting health IT hiring
  • Study shows patient consent, concerns crucial to HIEs
  • Will Stage 3 Meaningful Use help reduce health disparities?
  • HITPC reveals preliminary Stage 3 Meaningful Use measures
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center wins Enterprise HIMSS Davies Award of Excellence
  • Rise of team-based healthcare leads to more lower-level jobs
  • Texas Doc, Fake Prescribers among Convicts for Medicare Fraud
  • All told, the PUF contains 15.2 million reported uses of EHR technology by eligible professionals and hospitals over more than four years, beginning in April 2011 and ending in March 2015. Of those use, the vast majority belong to EPs — 14.9 million uses compared to 220,280 hospital EHR uses. To put those numbers in perspective, eligible professionals and hospitals successfully completed 722,675 meaningful use attestations between April 2011 and November 2015.

    While the file tracks reported EHR technology uses between April 2011 and March 2013, it does not specify the purpose behind reporting that fact. Numbers appear to peak at certain times, such as the end of the fiscal year, and indicate the reporting requirements of meaningful use. However, those details are not available.

    Moreover, the total number of reported EHR technologies appears to grow for both EPs and EHs in a consistent pattern. Background on the PUF does not indicate whether the figures are potentially cumulative or double counted for providers working with an REC and also demonstrating meaningful use.

    What is available paints a picture about competition between EHR vendors to expand their footprint in both inpatient and ambulatory settings.

    Before jumping ahead, here’s a breakdown of the total reported EHR technologies used by provider type. Up first, the figures for EPs.

    Total EHR uses reported by eligible professionals 2011-2014

    EPs have the numbers, but it is worth noting that EHs take in the dollars so far as EHR incentives are concerned.

    Total EHR uses reported by eligible hospital 2011-2014

    A year-over-year look at reported EHR technology uses by provider leads to a list of usual suspects. Who is on top depends on provider in question.

    The EHR vendor most often linked with hospital EHR implementations actually maintained a firm hold over the ambulatory market based on the PUF.

    Between December 2011 and December 2014, the number of EPs reported using Epic EHRs went from 24,092 to 109,310. Also close behind was Allscripts, whose total number of EHR uses grew in a similar fashion — 13,110 to 50,232— over the same period.

    Total EHR uses reported by eligible professionals December 2011

    Over that same duration, eClinicalWorks and NextGen Healthcare contend for third and fourth spots. The latter ended 2011 in the lead only to be necked out by the former in subsequent years.

    Total EHR uses reported by eligible professionals December 2012

    Epic’s lead rival Cerner is among the top ten but generally on the bottom half of the table.

    Total EHR uses reported by eligible professionals December 2013

    Cloud-based EHR vendors also featured among the top 10. Practice Fusion, the free EHR technology, consistently came out on top of athenahealth.

    Hospital EHR use tells a different story over the same period. Back in December 2011, MEDITECH led the way with most reported EHR uses, edging out Cerner 394 to 371. Rounding out the top five during that month were Epic Systems (302), CPSI (242), and MEDHOST (156). HCA Information & Technology Services was not too far behind in sixth place (141).

    Total EHR uses reported by eligible hospitals December 2011

    The following year the margins between hospital EHR vendors grew. MEDITECH (717) remained ahead of Cerner (681) and together increased the distance between the third most used EHR vendor Epic Systems (509). CPSI, meanwhile, held on to its position in fourth (386), this time followed by McKesson (306).

    Total EHR uses reported by eligible hospitals December 2012

    One year later would be MEDITECH’s last atop the list of reported hospital EHR uses.

    Reported EHR uses by eligible hospitals in December 2013

    As of December 2014, Cerner took the top spot, after leapfrogging MEDITECH by a sizeable margin over a one-year period — 1018 to 980. Those figures point to limited growth by the latter, whose reported EHR uses increased by 33 whereas the former grew by 143. Epic, meanwhile, narrow the distance between second-place MEDITECH and itself during the same time. Epic rose from 673 uses in December 2013 to 840 uses in December 2014.

    Reported EHR uses by eligible hospitals in December 2014

    The remaining data on reported hospital EHR uses shows the waxing and waning of other EHR vendors not name Epic Systems, Cerner, and MEDITECH. HCA Information & Technology Services started near the top only to disappear in subsequent years. CPSI and MEDHOST secured positions in the middle of the pack and experienced little significant growth over a four-year period.

    X

    EHRIntelligence

    Sign up to continue reading and gain Free Access to all our resources.

    Sign up for our free newsletter and join 60,000 of
    your peers to stay up to date with tips and advice on:

    EHR Optimization
    EHR Interoperability
    EHR Replacement

    White Papers, Webcasts, Featured Articles and Exclusive Interviews

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...